Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Pulmonary Medicine and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Bench experiments comparing simulated inspiratory effort when breathing helium-oxygen mixtures to that during positive pressure support with air

Andrew R Martin14*, Ira M Katz12, Katharina Jenöfi1, Georges Caillibotte1, Laurent Brochard3 and Joëlle Texereau1

Author affiliations

1 Medical Gases Group, Air Liquide Santé International, Centre de Recherche Claude-Delorme, Jouy-en-Josas, France

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lafayette College, Easton, PA, USA

3 Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

4 Current affiliation: Medical Gases, Delaware Research and Technology Center, American Air Liquide, Newark, DE, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2012, 12:62  doi:10.1186/1471-2466-12-62

Published: 3 October 2012

Abstract

Background

Inhalation of helium-oxygen (He/O2) mixtures has been explored as a means to lower the work of breathing of patients with obstructive lung disease. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with positive pressure support is also used for this purpose. The bench experiments presented herein were conducted in order to compare simulated patient inspiratory effort breathing He/O2 with that breathing medical air, with or without pressure support, across a range of adult, obstructive disease patterns.

Methods

Patient breathing was simulated using a dual-chamber mechanical test lung, with the breathing compartment connected to an ICU ventilator operated in NIV mode with medical air or He/O2 (78/22 or 65/35%). Parabolic or linear resistances were inserted at the inlet to the breathing chamber. Breathing chamber compliance was also varied. The inspiratory effort was assessed for the different gas mixtures, for three breathing patterns, with zero pressure support (simulating unassisted spontaneous breathing), and with varying levels of pressure support.

Results

Inspiratory effort increased with increasing resistance and decreasing compliance. At a fixed resistance and compliance, inspiratory effort increased with increasing minute ventilation, and decreased with increasing pressure support. For parabolic resistors, inspiratory effort was lower for He/O2 mixtures than for air, whereas little difference was measured for nominally linear resistance. Relatively small differences in inspiratory effort were measured between the two He/O2 mixtures. Used in combination, reductions in inspiratory effort provided by He/O2 and pressure support were additive.

Conclusions

The reduction in inspiratory effort afforded by breathing He/O2 is strongly dependent on the severity and type of airway obstruction. Varying helium concentration between 78% and 65% has small impact on inspiratory effort, while combining He/O2 with pressure support provides an additive reduction in inspiratory effort. In addition, breathing He/O2 alone may provide an alternative to pressure support in circumstances where NIV is not available or poorly tolerated.

Keywords:
Helium; Oxygen; Heliox; Inspiratory effort; Work of breathing; Airway resistance; Lung compliance; Non-invasive ventilation; Pressure support