Skip to main content

'Be active, eat right', evaluation of an overweight prevention protocol among 5-year-old children: design of a cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of overweight and obesity in children has at least doubled in the past 25 years with a major impact on health. In 2005 a prevention protocol was developed applicable within Youth Health Care. This study aims to assess the effects of this protocol on prevalence of overweight and health behaviour among children.

Methods and design

A cluster randomised controlled trial is conducted among 5-year-old children included by 44 Youth Health Care teams randomised within 9 Municipal Health Services. The teams are randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. The teams measure the weight and height of all children. When a child in the intervention group is detected with overweight according to the international age and gender specific cut-off points of BMI, the prevention protocol is applied. According to this protocol parents of overweight children are invited for up to three counselling sessions during which they receive personal advice about a healthy lifestyle, and are motivated for and assisted in behavioural change.

The primary outcome measures are Body Mass Index and waist circumference of the children. Parents will complete questionnaires to assess secondary outcome measures: levels of overweight inducing/reducing behaviours (i.e. being physically active, having breakfast, drinking sweet beverages and watching television/playing computer games), parenting styles, parenting practices, and attitudes of parents regarding these behaviours, health-related quality of life of the children, and possible negative side effects of the prevention protocol. Data will be collected at baseline (when the children are aged 5 years), and after 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Additionally, a process and a cost-effectiveness evaluation will be conducted.

Discussion

In this study called 'Be active, eat right' we evaluate an overweight prevention protocol for use in the setting of Youth Health Care. It is hypothesized that the use of this protocol will result in a healthier lifestyle of the children and an improved BMI and waist circumference.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04965410

Peer Review reports

Background

Childhood overweight and obesity

The prevalence of overweight and obesity among children has at least doubled over the past 25 years, especially in socially disadvantaged and specific ethnic subgroups [16]. In the Netherlands, in 2003 the prevalence of overweight (obesity included) among boys and girls aged about 5 years was 12.8% and 17.5%, respectively, compared with 5.2% and 8.6%, respectively, in 1980 [7].

Adverse health effects of obesity in children are: type 2 diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol levels, apnoea during sleep, psychosocial problems and a lower quality of life [812]. Being overweight or obese as a child increases the risk of becoming an overweight or obese adult [13], and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality [1317]. Therefore, prevention of childhood overweight and obesity is important. To prevent and curtail the increase of overweight and obesity in children, evidence-based prevention programs are needed.

Preventing childhood overweight and obesity

Studies have suggested that the methods for prevention of overweight and obesity in childhood are family-based intervention programs that include personal advice about a healthy lifestyle and counselling behavioural changes. Such programs should focus on a combination of inducing healthy nutritional behaviour (i.e. having family breakfast daily and reducing intake of sweet beverages) and reducing sedentary behaviour (i.e. inducing being physically active and reducing watching TV/playing computer games) [1821]. The parents' role is of particular importance for the behaviour of children, especially among young children. Parents directly determine the physical and social environment of children, and indirectly influence behaviour and habits through socialization processes and modelling [22, 23]. It is also recommended that more attention should be given to long-term sustainability and incorporating of interventions in daily practice [20].

The Netherlands has a unique system for the maintenance of the health of children, i.e. the Youth Health Care (YHC) system. All children (0–19 years) are monitored by a nation-wide program at set ages. This program is offered free of charge by the government; participation is voluntary. The attendance rate is 95%. During the YHC check-ups the growth of each child is measured [24]. In 2005 a consensus-based protocol was developed to be applied in the YHC setting for the prevention of overweight and obesity in children aged 0 to 19 years [25]. The Municipal Health Services (MHSs) are preparing the implementation of this prevention protocol; however, before wide-scale implementation an effect evaluation of the protocol is needed.

Objectives

The first YHC check-up during school age is at 5–6 years: an important moment to consider the prevention of overweight. The aim of the study 'Be active, eat right' is to assess the effectiveness of the prevention protocol among children with overweight. The design of the study is described below.

The study hypotheses

The hypotheses of the study are that, after two years of follow-up, compared with the control group the overweight children in the intervention group will:

  • have reduced BMI and waist circumference

  • more frequently have family breakfast on a daily basis, and consume less sweet beverages

  • spend more time being physically active and less time watching television/playing computer games

We apply a cluster design with YHC teams (physician, nurse and assistant) as the unit of randomisation. Randomisation at the individual level (i.e. the level of the children) may lead to contamination of the control group [26]. The outcome measures of the study (BMI, waist circumference, and levels of inducing/reducing overweight behaviours) are performed at the individual level. The follow-up measures will be compared between the intervention and control group, taking into account the baseline values.

Methods and design

Study design

This cluster randomised controlled trial is conducted in the Netherlands among children aged about 5 years and their parents, who are invited by the MHSs for a regular preventive health check. The YHC teams that perform the check consist of a physician, a nurse and an assistant; they form the unit of randomisation. The randomisation code was developed using a computer random number generator in SPSS to select random permuted blocks (specified allocation ratio 1:1). The block lengths were 4 or 6, depending on the number of YHC teams that participate per MHS. Within the MHSs an even number of YHC teams were randomly allocated to the two study arms: an intervention and a control group. The teams in the intervention group offer the prevention protocol to parents of overweight children, and in the control group the teams offer usual care to these parents. The effects of the prevention protocol will be evaluated after two years of follow-up by comparing the outcomes of BMI and waist circumference of the overweight children with those of the children in the control group, taking into account the baseline values of these measures [20, 27]. Data collection started in September 2007 and will continue until August 2010. The Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam approved the study protocol (reference number MEC-2007-163).

Study procedure

A few weeks before the regular preventive health check is scheduled, all parents receive information about the study 'Be active, eat right' at home by mail and are invited to provide written informed consent for participation in the study. In addition, all parents are invited to complete a two-page questionnaire to measure data on demographic factors, overweight inducing/reducing behaviours (i.e. being physically active, having breakfast, drinking sweet beverages and watching television/playing computer games), their attitudes regarding these behaviours, and the health-related quality of life of their children. With this information a non-response analysis can be performed.

During the preventive health check, the YHC teams register the measures of weight, height and waist circumference of the children, calculate the BMI, and classify all children as normal weight, overweight or obese according to the international age and gender specific cut-off points of BMI [27]. In the control group whenever a YHC team detects a child with overweight, they apply usual care. In general, this implies giving basic information to the parents during the regular preventive health check about the importance of good nutrition and physical activity.

In the intervention group, the subgroup of parents of overweight children are offered up to three additional structured lifestyle counselling sessions, according to the prevention protocol. During these sessions the focus is on four behaviours, i.e. being physically active, having breakfast, drinking sweet beverages, and watching television/playing computer games [28]. These particular behaviours were chosen based on a literature review reporting on the most promising elements to prevent overweight [25]. During the counselling sessions, parents receive personal advice about a healthy lifestyle and are motivated for and assisted in behavioural change.

At the end of the regular preventive health check, the subgroup of parents with overweight children (in both groups) are invited to complete an additional questionnaire. This questionnaire provides more specific data about the baseline levels of overweight inducing/reducing behaviours, attitudes of parents regarding these behaviours, and the health-related quality of life of the children.

Participants

Municipal Health Services and Youth Health Care teams

The managers of the MHSs, managers of the YHC department, and managers of the department of health education of all 37 MHSs in the Netherlands were informed about the study by mail and were contacted by the researchers by telephone in the first half of 2007. From the 37 MHSs, 9 volunteered to participate in the study. Of the remaining MHSs, 3 did not meet the inclusion criteria (i.e. MHSs should have YHC teams that had not used the prevention protocol before), 25 MHSs had other reasons not to participate (e.g. a recent or upcoming merger of MHSs). Of the 9 participating MHSs, a total of 44 YHC teams were willing to participate in the study. When a professional worked in more than one YHC team, the team that invited the most children for the health check during the school year 2007/2008 was selected for participation, and the other team was excluded from participation. At the start of the study no major changes were expected in the composition of the participating teams. The participating teams cover both urban and rural regions in the Netherlands. Prior to the start of the study, the research group arranged meetings to explain the procedure of the study and to instruct the participating YHC professionals.

Children and their parents

The study population consists of the subgroup of children with overweight according to the international age and gender specific cut-off points for BMI. Parents and children will be excluded from analysis if the children have chronic health problems that may influence the outcome measures. In order to participate the parents should have at least basic Dutch language skills. The study design and participant flow are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the design of the study.

Figure 2
figure 2

Flow of the clusters and participants through the trial.

Intervention

The prevention protocol (see appendix) is based on theories and models of behavioural change, i.e. the ASE model, a theoretical model of exercise habit formation, the Precaution Adoption Process Model, the Elaboration Likelihood Model, the stages of change model, and motivational interviewing techniques [2934]. During the regular preventive health check, when a child in the intervention group with overweight is detected, the parents are offered up to three additional structured lifestyle counselling sessions to promote overweight-preventing behaviours. Prior to the start of the study, the YHC professionals in the intervention group received training in a non-directing guiding style as part of the prevention protocol [35]. The YHC professionals assess whether the parents are motivated to participate in this counselling, and will make use of a motivational interview approach if needed [35]. The three additional structured lifestyle counselling sessions are offered to parents with intervals of 1, 3 and 6 months after the regular preventive health check. The content of each visit depends on the stage of behavioural change that the parents are in [33]. The purpose of the sessions is to make parents aware of the overweight of their child, to provide information about overweight and its consequences, and to motivate the parents for and assist them in behavioural change. Materials that are used during the sessions are: a form for the YHC professional to assess the behaviours that should be targeted within the family, and diaries on energy intake and expenditure to be completed by the parents. Table 1 shows the guidelines for the four target behaviours for children at the age of about 5 years. The YHC professional and the parents together draw up a family-oriented action plan aiming at the promotion of physical activity and outdoor playing time, having family breakfast daily, consuming less sweet drinks and/or limiting watching television/playing computer games (Table 2) [25]. A pilot study has established the feasibility and acceptability of the prevention protocol [36].

Table 1 Guidelines used during counselling sessions regarding the four target behaviours for children aged 5 years.

Measurements

Primary outcomes

Body measurements

Standardised methods are used to measure weight, height and waist circumference of all children. The YHC professionals received training in measuring the waist circumference of the children and all use the same type of measuring tape (SECA 200) provided by the researchers. BMI is calculated using weight in kilogram divided by squared height in metres. The YHC professionals received a calculator with instructions on how to calculate BMI. At baseline the YHC professionals classify the children into groups of normal weight, overweight or obese, according to the age and gender-specific cut-off points for BMI as published by the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) [27, 37]. After two years of follow-up the anthropometric measures will be repeated.

Secondary outcomes

Four target behaviours

In the questionnaire (2 pages) and the additional questionnaire booklet (including questions from SQUASH [38], CHQ-PF28 [39] and SDQ [40]) parents report (for weekdays and weekend days) the following:

  • the frequency and duration of physical activity and outdoor playing time of their children

  • how often their children have breakfast

  • the intake of sweet beverages of their children

  • the frequency and duration of inactivity of their children due to watching television and/or playing computer games

Data on parenting styles, parenting practices and attitude of the parents concerning the four target behaviours are assessed. Examples are: behaviour of the parents themselves, family rules about watching television/playing computer games, and availability at home of sweet beverages and breakfast products. After 12 and after 24 months of follow-up a questionnaire to assess this data will be repeated.

Other characteristics that will be taken into account include:

  • demographics: gender, ethnicity of the children and parents, educational level of the parents, household and family composition, and neighbourhood characteristics (i.e. can children play safely outside; presence of busy roads, etc.)

  • self-reported weight and height of the parents themselves

  • participation in weight-management programs other than those used in the present study

  • general health of the children (measured with the 28-item Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-PF28; [39])

  • health-related quality of life, and emotional/behavioural problems of the children [40]

  • indicators of negative side effects (i.e. worry, stigmatization and lower self-esteem related to the weight of the children, and development of relative underweight [20])

Sample size

Sample size was calculated taking into account the intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ρ = 0.1), the number of clusters (44), the expected prevalence of overweight children in the study population, the standard deviation (SD), expected effect (a difference in mean), and the power of the study (80%). With a participation of 50%, an expected prevalence of overweight children of 9% and a loss-to-follow-up of 30%, at least 1,1301 children (and their parents) should be invited by the YHC teams to participate in the study to have a final sample of about 356 overweight children (178 in both the intervention and control group). Assuming a SD of BMI to be 1.0 kg/m2 [36], a difference in mean BMI of 0.35 kg/m2 between the children in the intervention group and the children in the control group can be established under the assumptions mentioned above. Assuming an SD of the average number of hours per day of watching TV, video, DVD and playing computer games combined to be 60 minutes per day [36, 41, 42], a difference of 20 minutes per day can be established.

Statistical analysis

The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the prevention protocol among children with overweight. An intention-to-treat analysis will be applied [43]. Multi-level analyses will be applied because of the three-level structure of the study, i.e. correlation of the repeated observations within a participant and the correlation of the observations of participants within a YHC team [26, 44]. Linear multilevel analysis will be applied for continuous outcome variables and logistic multilevel analysis for dichotomous outcome variables [44]. Biometric and behavioural outcomes of the children at age 7 years will be analysed with independent variables: intervention or control group, gender, age, socio-economic status, ethnicity, weight of the parents, and baseline levels of the outcome variables. Interaction effects of gender, social disadvantage and ethnic background with the effect of the prevention protocol will be explored.

Process evaluation: non-response, adherence and cost-effectiveness

In addition to the effect evaluation a process evaluation will be carried out.

A non-response analysis will be conducted to determine possible selection bias. In the non-response analysis the following characteristics of (non)-participating children and their parents will be considered: ethnicity of the parents and children, educational level of the parents, household composition, an indication of the levels of the four target behaviours reported by the parents, and self-reported BMI of the parents and their children. For adherence to the prevention protocol the following variables are registered: classification of the children by the YHC professionals to the correct weight status according to the international age and gender specific cut-off points of BMI, the number of sessions the parents of overweight children attend, and the intensity of the sessions (i.e. did the parents complete energy intake and/or expenditure diaries, draw up a family-oriented action plan with the YHC professional, etc.). Adherence of both the YHC professionals and parents to the different elements of the prevention protocol will be analysed in relation to changes in BMI, waist circumference, and lifestyle of the children by multiple linear or logistic regression analysis (depending on the type of outcome variable). Analysis of these variables may indicate which elements of the prevention protocol work (or do not work), and for whom. In addition, satisfaction with the protocol of parents and YHC professionals will also be assessed. Finally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using a societal perspective, including program and parents costs.

Discussion

This study presents the design of a cluster randomised controlled trial on the prevention of overweight and obesity in children. The study evaluates a protocol that is proposed for application in the YHC setting for the prevention of overweight and obesity in children.

It is hypothesised that, after two years of follow-up, overweight children in the intervention group will have less BMI and waist circumference, spend more time being physically active, more frequently have family breakfast on a daily basis, consume less sweet beverages, and spend less time watching television/playing computer games compared to overweight children in the control group. Differences between subgroups (ethnicity and socio-economic status) regarding the effects of the prevention protocol, and determinants of overweight and obesity, will be described. Several process variables will be registered to measure whether differences exist in subgroups of adherence to the prevention protocol, concerning the positive effects on BMI, waist circumference and lifestyle. This will also provide insight into the effective elements of the prevention protocol.

Strengths of the study are the size of the study (44 YHC teams), the random controlled design, and the regular preventive health check of the MHSs which more than 95% of all invited parents and their children attend [45]. Children receive a YHC check-up at set ages, which offers optimal opportunity to provide tailored prevention. The follow-up at 12 and 24 months allow to investigate the long-term effects of the prevention protocol. Regarding the generalisability of the study results, a first strength is that it is a controlled study conducted in the practice setting. The intervention is applicable in the daily practice of the YHC professionals, which will facilitate implementation of the prevention protocol if it is found to be effective. A second strength regarding generalisability is that the participating YHC teams cover both urban and rural areas. A limitation of the study is that the behaviour of the children and their parents is based on self-reports by the parents.

In conclusion, this study evaluates a protocol for the prevention of overweight and obesity in children. The results of this study will provide insight into the effectiveness of the prevention protocol used in Youth Health Care, and in the determinants of overweight and obesity of children aged 5 to 7 years.

Appendix

Description of the intervention: the different elements of the prevention protocol

  • The YHC professional classifies children as normal weight, overweight or obese during the regular preventive health check

  • The YHC professional offers parents of overweight children up to three additional lifestyle counselling sessions

  • The YHC professional assesses whether the parents are motivated to participate

  • The YHC professional will use the motivational interview approach if necessary

  • The YHC professional assesses the behaviour(s) that should be targeted

  • The YHC professional gives health-promoting and personal advice to the parents

  • The YHC professional motivates parents for behavioural change

  • The YHC professional and parents together draw up an action plan

  • Parents complete diaries on energy intake and expenditure

  • Intervals of the counselling sessions: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months

References

  1. Whitlock EP, Williams SB, Gold R, Smith PR, Shipman SA: Screening and interventions for childhood overweight: a summary of evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics. 2005, 116 (1): e125-144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R: Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev. 2004, 5 (Suppl 1): 4-104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fredriks AM, van Buuren S, Burgmeijer RJ, Meulmeester JF, Beuker RJ, Brugman E, Roede MJ, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Wit JM: Continuing positive secular growth change in The Netherlands 1955–1997. Pediatric research. 2000, 47 (3): 316-323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fredriks AM, van Buuren S, Wit JM, Verloove-Vanhorick SP: Body index measurements in 1996–7 compared with 1980. Archives of disease in childhood. 2000, 82 (2): 107-112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fredriks AM, Van Buuren S, Sing RA, Wit JM, Verloove-Vanhorick SP: Alarming prevalences of overweight and obesity for children of Turkish, Moroccan and Dutch origin in The Netherlands according to international standards. Acta Paediatr. 2005, 94 (4): 496-498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirasing RA, Fredriks AM, van Buuren S, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Wit JM: [Increased prevalence of overweight and obesity in Dutch children, and the detection of overweight and obesity using international criteria and new reference diagrams]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 2001, 145 (27): 1303-1308.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van den Hurk K, van Dommelen P, van Buuren S, Verkerk PH, Hirasing RA: Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the Netherlands in 2003 compared to 1980 and 1997. Archives of disease in childhood. 2007, 92 (11): 992-995.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulk-Bunschoten AMW, Renders CM, Van Leerdam FJM, HiraSing RA: [Youth Health Care Overweight-detection-protocol]. 2005, Woerden: Platform Jeugdgezondheidszorg

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz WH: Health consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics. 1998, 101 (3 Pt 2): 518-525.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Must A, Strauss RS: Risks and consequences of childhood and adolescent obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999, 23 (Suppl 2): S2-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wabitsch M: Overweight and obesity in European children: definition and diagnostic procedures, risk factors and consequences for later health outcome. European journal of pediatrics. 2000, 159 (Suppl 1): S8-13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor ED, Theim KR, Mirch MC, Ghorbani S, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Adler-Wailes DC, Brady S, Reynolds JC, Calis KA, Yanovski JA: Orthopedic complications of overweight in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006, 117 (6): 2167-2174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh AS, Mulder C, Twisk JW, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ: Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2008, 9 (5): 474-488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reilly JJ, Methven E, McDowell ZC, Hacking B, Alexander D, Stewart L, Kelnar CJ: Health consequences of obesity. Archives of disease in childhood. 2003, 88 (9): 748-752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Must A: Does overweight in childhood have an impact on adult health?. Nutrition reviews. 2003, 61 (4): 139-142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maffeis C, Tato L: Long-term effects of childhood obesity on morbidity and mortality. Hormone research. 2001, 55 (Suppl 1): 42-45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Power C, Lake JK, Cole TJ: Measurement and long-term health risks of child and adolescent fatness. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997, 21 (7): 507-526.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell K, Waters E, O'Meara S, Kelly S, Summerbell C: Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online). 2002, CD001871-2

  19. Position of the American Dietetic Association: individual-, family-, school-, and community-based interventions for pediatric overweight. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2006, 106 (6): 925-945.

  20. Doak CM, Visscher TL, Renders CM, Seidell JC: The prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: a review of interventions and programmes. Obes Rev. 2006, 7 (1): 111-136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalavainen MP, Korppi MO, Nuutinen OM: Clinical efficacy of group-based treatment for childhood obesity compared with routinely given individual counseling. International journal of obesity (2005). 2007, 31 (10): 1500-1508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van der Horst K, Oenema A, Ferreira I, Wendel-Vos W, Giskes K, van Lenthe F, Brug J: A systematic review of environmental correlates of obesity-related dietary behaviors in youth. Health education research. 2007, 22 (2): 203-226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ritchie LD, Welk G, Styne D, Gerstein DE, Crawford PB: Family environment and pediatric overweight: what is a parent to do?. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2005, 105 (5 Suppl 1): S70-79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burgmeijer RJF, van Geenhuizen YM, Filedt Kok-Weimar T, de Jager AM: [On the road to adulthood. Evaluation School Health Care 1996]. 1997, Leiden: TNO Preventie en Gezondheid/KPMG

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hirasing RA, Bulk-Bunschoten AMW, Renders CM: [Youth Health Care Overweight-prevention-protocol]. 2005, Amsterdam: Free University Medical Center

    Google Scholar 

  26. Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG: CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2004, 328 (7441): 702-708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2000, 320 (7244): 1240-1243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Whitaker RC: Obesity prevention in pediatric primary care: four behaviors to target. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2003, 157 (8): 725-727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. De Vries H, Mudde AN: Predicting stage transitions for smoking cessation applying the attitude-social influence-efficacy model. Psychology & Health. 1998, 13 (2): 369-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aarts H, Paulussen T, Schaalma H: Physical exercise habit: on the conceptualization and formation of habitual health behaviours. Health education research. 1997, 12 (3): 363-374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM: A model of the precaution adoption process: evidence from home radon testing. Health Psychol. 1992, 11 (3): 170-180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Petty R, Cacioppo JT: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology. 1986, 19: 123-205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. Progress in behavior modification. 1992, 28: 183-218.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller WR, Rollnick S: Motivational interviewing, preparing people to change. 2002, The Guilford Press, New York London

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rollnick S, Butler CC, McCambridge J, Kinnersley P, Elwyn G, Resnicow K: Consultations about changing behaviour. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2005, 331 (7522): 961-963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. van de Laar CWE, Renders CM, HiraSing RA: [Preventie van overgewicht: een minimale interventie strategie bij 5/6 jarige kinderen binnen de JGZ, Presentatie bij NWO-werkgemeenschap Jeugd&Gezondheid: 20–21 januari 2006]. 2006, Soesterberg,

    Google Scholar 

  37. Must A, Anderson SE: Body mass index in children and adolescents: considerations for population-based applications. International journal of obesity (2005). 2006, 30 (4): 590-594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wendel-Vos GC, Schuit AJ, Saris WH, Kromhout D: Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003, 56 (12): 1163-1169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Raat H, Botterweck AM, Landgraf JM, Hoogeveen WC, Essink-Bot ML: Reliability and validity of the short form of the child health questionnaire for parents (CHQ-PF28) in large random school based and general population samples. Journal of epidemiology and community health. 2005, 59 (1): 75-82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Goodman R: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997, 38 (5): 581-586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Robinson TN: Reducing children's television viewing to prevent obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 1999, 282 (16): 1561-1567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gortmaker SL, Peterson K, Wiecha J, Sobol AM, Dixit S, Fox MK, Laird N: Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth: Planet Health. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 1999, 153 (4): 409-418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hollis S, Campbell F: What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1999, 319 (7211): 670-674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Twisk JWR: Applied Multilevel Analysis: A Practical Guide. 2006, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. CBO: Guideline Diagnosis and Treatment of Obesity in Adults and Children. Utrecht. 2007, [http://www.cbo.nl]

    Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by a grant from the major funding body ZonMw, the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (project no. 50-50110-98-355).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lydian Veldhuis.

Additional information

Competing interests

All authors (L Veldhuis, MK Struijk, W Kroeze, A Oenema, CM Renders, AMW Bulk-Bunschoten, RA HiraSing and H Raat) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HR and RH had the original idea for the study and its design, and were responsible for acquiring the study grant. LV further developed the study protocol and is responsible for the data collection, data analysis and reporting the study results. WK helps to coordinate the study, and helped in developing intervention instruments and questionnaires. CR and AB help to coordinate the study. MS helps to coordinate the study and participates in data collection. CR, AB and AO provide expert input during the study. HR and RH supervise the study. All authors regularly participated in discussing the design and protocols used in the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veldhuis, L., Struijk, M.K., Kroeze, W. et al. 'Be active, eat right', evaluation of an overweight prevention protocol among 5-year-old children: design of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 9, 177 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-177

Keywords