Table 6 |
||||||
|
Predictors of the influence of policy interventions on HCWs' potential decisions about working |
||||||
|
Interventions: "Would you be more likely to work if... ?" * § |
Gender |
Job Type |
Carer |
Work Type (FT/PT) |
Age Group |
Living Arrangement |
|
|
||||||
|
You were allowed to work at the nearest site to your home |
0.059 |
0.187 |
0.521 |
0.710 |
0.880 |
0.086 |
|
You were provided with accommodation so that you do not take infection home |
0.304 |
0.515 |
0.104 |
0.136 |
0.313 |
0.377 |
|
Your employer provided transport to get you to work and home again |
0.007 |
0.022 |
0.158 |
0.310 |
0.156 |
0.010 |
|
Childcare was provided for you |
0.188 |
0.127 |
0.755 |
0.975 |
0.013 |
0.699 |
|
You were offered vaccination (if available) and/or treatment if you fell ill |
0.732 |
0.250 |
0.616 |
0.252 |
0.042 |
0.017 |
|
Your family were offered vaccination (if available) and/or treatment if they fell ill |
0.993 |
0.709 |
0.302 |
0.400 |
0.060 |
<0.001 |
|
Your employer shared their emergency plans with you and told you in advance what would be expected of you during a pandemic |
0.002 |
0.916 |
0.916 |
0.605 |
0.301 |
0.097 |
|
You were offered PPE when working with affected patients |
0.053 |
0.465 |
0.585 |
0.379 |
0.425 |
0.029 |
|
Your employers accepted liability for any mistake made whilst doing a job you are not trained for |
0.446 |
0.002 |
0.216 |
0.497 |
0.005 |
0.050 |
|
You were allowed to work more flexible hours |
0.002 |
0.009 |
0.044 |
0.711 |
0.007 |
0.025 |
|
You were paid a top-up salary that reflected the level of duties you were asked to take on during a pandemic |
0.105 |
0.093 |
0.145 |
0.987 |
<0.001 |
0.167 |
|
You were provided with life/disability insurance |
0.450 |
0.090 |
0.359 |
0.333 |
0.014 |
0.152 |
|
|
||||||
|
* P values: Bonferroni correction factor applied to account for multiple testing: cut-off for significance adjusted to 0.003 § Regression model adjusted for Gender, Job Type, Caring Role(s), Work Type, Age Group and Living Arrangements |
||||||
|
Damery et al. BMC Public Health 2009 9:142 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-142 |
||||||