Table 2 |
|||||
|
Comparison of influenza surveillance improvement strategies: Baseline and follow-up output values for hypothetical example |
|||||
|
Baseline |
Follow-up |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
Probability (%) |
Time (days) |
Probability (%) |
Time (days) |
||
|
|
|||||
|
Detection from clinical sites |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Path 1 |
Doctor orders laboratory test |
0.15 |
23 |
16.0 |
15 |
|
Path 2 |
Hospital orders laboratory test |
0.03 |
23 |
5.1 |
15 |
|
Path 3 |
Reporting by sentinel doctor |
0.0 |
30 |
2.6 |
23 |
|
Path 4 |
Reporting by sentinel hospital |
0.0 |
30 |
4.2 |
23 |
|
Path 5 |
Active surveillance of doctors |
0.0 |
30 |
8.6 |
23 |
|
Path 6 |
Active surveillance of hospitals |
0.0 |
30 |
4.6 |
23 |
|
|
|||||
|
Detection from community sites |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Path 7 |
Tracking of employee sick days |
0.0 |
35 |
8.6 |
28 |
|
Path 8 |
Tracking of electronic media |
0.03 |
41 |
43.2 |
34 |
|
Path 9 |
Detection by community-based monitoring system |
0.01 |
43 |
10.8 |
36 |
|
|
|||||
|
Moore et al. BMC Public Health 2008 8:186 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-186 |
|||||