Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control

Sergio Recuenco12, Bryan Cherry1 and Millicent Eidson12*

Author Affiliations

1 Zoonoses Program, Bureau of Communicable Diseases Control, New York State Department of Health, 621 Corning Tower, Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12237, USA

2 School of Public Health, University at Albany-SUNY, One University Place, Rensselaer, New York 12144, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2007, 7:47  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-47

Published: 2 April 2007

Abstract

Background

The cost-benefit of raccoon rabies control strategies such as oral rabies vaccination (ORV) are under evaluation. As an initial quantification of the potential cost savings for a control program, the collection of selected rabies cost data was pilot tested for five counties in New York State (NYS) in a three-year period.

Methods

Rabies costs reported to NYS from the study counties were computerized and linked to a human rabies exposure database. Consolidated costs by county and year were averaged and compared.

Results

Reported rabies-associated costs for all rabies variants totalled $2.1 million, for human rabies postexposure prophylaxes (PEP) (90.9%), animal specimen preparation/shipment to laboratory (4.7%), and pet vaccination clinics (4.4%). The proportion that may be attributed to raccoon rabies control was 37% ($784,529). Average costs associated with the raccoon variant varied across counties from $440 to $1,885 per PEP, $14 to $44 per specimen, and $0.33 to $15 per pet vaccinated.

Conclusion

Rabies costs vary widely by county in New York State, and were associated with human population size and methods used by counties to estimate costs. Rabies cost variability must be considered in developing estimates of possible ORV-related cost savings. Costs of PEPs and specimen preparation/shipments, as well as the costs of pet vaccination provided by this study may be valuable for development of more realistic scenarios in economic modelling of ORV costs versus benefits.