Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Sep 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Pursell |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Sep 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Sep 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Thomson |
5 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philippa Howden-Chapman |
20 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stanton Glantz |
1 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Pursell |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
1 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 Jan 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Thomson |
23 Jan 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stanton Glantz |
5 Mar 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Pursell |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Mar 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
16 May 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esteve Fernandez |
22 May 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Pursell |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
22 May 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
19 Jun 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Pursell |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
19 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
22 Jun 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Pursell |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
22 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
29 Jun 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Jun 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-7-131 |
You can find further information about peer review here.