Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Jul 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - R Wallace |
10 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toru Watanabe |
25 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keechilat Pavithran |
5 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luigi Ferrucci |
28 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
25 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Meletis |
24 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
28 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
3 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Takeo Nakayama |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
3 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
3 Apr 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Apr 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-85 |
You can find further information about peer review here.