Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Klaus Linde |
| 4 May 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kate Thomas |
| 28 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Hughes |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 28 Sep 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Susanne Moebus |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Klaus Linde |
| 20 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Hughes |
| 2 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers |
| 18 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Susanne Moebus |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Susanne Moebus |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 22 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Susanne Moebus |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 22 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Feb 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Feb 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.