Research article

Health Research Profile to assess the capacity of low and middle income countries for equity-oriented research

P Tugwell¹ , C Sitthi-Amorn² , J Hatcher-Roberts³ , V Neufeld⁴ , P Makara⁵ , F Munoz⁶ , P Czerny^7,11 , V Robinson⁸ , Y Nuyens^9,12 and D Okello¹⁰

¹  Centre for Global Health, Institute for Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Ottawa, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada

²  Institute of Health Research, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

³  World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Ottawa, Canada

⁴  McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

⁵  World Health Organization

⁶  Latin American Centre for Health Systems Research (CLAISS)

⁷  Coordinator, Health Research Profile Project (at time of Project)

⁸  Centre for Global Health, Institute for Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

⁹  Coordinator, Council on Health Research for Development (at time of project)

¹⁰  World Health Organization, Mbabane, Swaziland

¹¹  Industry Canada, Broadband Program Office, Canada

¹²  Free-lance consultant

author email corresponding author email

BMC Public Health 2006, 6:151doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-151

Published:	12 June 2006

Abstract

Background

The Commission on Health Research for Development concluded that "for the most vulnerable people, the benefits of research offer a potential for change that has gone largely untapped." This project was designed to assess low and middle income country capacity and commitment for equity-oriented research.

Methods

A multi-disciplinary team with coordinators from each of four regions (Asia, Latin America, Africa and Central and Eastern Europe) developed a questionnaire through consensus meetings using a mini-Delphi technique. Indicators were selected based on their quality, validity, comprehensiveness, feasibility and relevance to equity. Indicators represented five categories that form the Health Research Profile (HRP): 1) Research priorities; 2) Resources (amount spent on research); 3) Production of knowledge (capacity); 4) Packaging of knowledge and 5) Evidence of research impact on policy and equity. We surveyed three countries from each region.

Results

Most countries reported explicit national health research priorities. Of these, half included specific research priorities to address inequities in health. Data on financing were lacking for most countries due to inadequate centralized collection of this information. The five main components of HRP showed a gradient where countries scoring lower on the Human Development Index (HDI) had a lower capacity to conduct research to meet local health research needs. Packaging such as peer-reviewed journals and policy forums were reported by two thirds of the countries. Seven out of 12 countries demonstrated impact of health research on policies and reported engagement of stakeholders in this process.

Conclusion

Only one out of 12 countries indicated there was research on all fronts of the equity debate. Knowledge sharing and management is needed to strengthen within-country capacity for research and implementation to reduce inequities in health. We recommend that all countries (and external agencies) should invest more in building a certain minimum level of national capacity for equity-oriented research.