Research article

You might as well smoke; the misleading and harmful public message about smokeless tobacco

Carl V Phillips^1,2,3 , Constance Wang² and Brian Guenzel³

¹  University of Texas Medical School, Center for Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, Houston, USA

²  University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, USA

³  Center for Philosophy, Health, and Policy Sciences, Inc., 10923 Atwell Dr, Houston, TX 77096, USA

author email corresponding author email

BMC Public Health 2005, 5:31doi:10.1186/1471-2458-5-31

Published:	5 April 2005

Abstract

Background

Compared to smoking cigarettes, use of Western smokeless tobacco (ST) products is associated with a very small risk of life-threatening disease (with estimates in the range of a few percent of the risk from smoking, or even less). This means that smokers can realize substantial health benefits by switching to ST, an obvious substitute. But consumers and policy makers have little chance of learning that ST is much less dangerous than smoking because popular information provided by experts and advocates overstates the health risks from ST relative to cigarettes.

Methods

To examine the extent of this overstatement in one medium, we conducted a systematic review of websites containing information about ST and health risks. We examined the content of 316 relevant websites identified by a Google search.

Results

We found that when any substantive information about the risk from ST is given, the risk is almost universally conflated with the risk from cigarettes. Accurate comparative risk information was quite rare, provided by only a handful of websites, all appearing low in our search results (i.e., of low popularity and thus unlikely to be found by someone searching for information). About 1/3 of the websites, including various authoritative entities, explicitly claimed that ST is as bad as or worse than cigarettes. Most of the other sites made statements that imply the risks are comparable.

Conclusion

Through these websites, and presumably other information provided by the same government, advocacy, and educational organizations, ST users are told, in effect, that they might as well switch to smoking if they like it a bit more. Smokers and policy makers are told there is no potential for harm reduction. These messages are clearly false and likely harmful, representing violations of ethical standards.