Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Promoting healthy weight in primary school children through physical activity and nutrition education: a pragmatic evaluation of the CHANGE! randomised intervention study

Stuart J Fairclough1*, Allan F Hackett2, Ian G Davies2, Rebecca Gobbi23, Kelly A Mackintosh24, Genevieve L Warburton2, Gareth Stratton145, Esther MF van Sluijs6 and Lynne M Boddy1

Author Affiliations

1 Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, 62, Great Crosshall Street, Liverpool, UK

2 Faculty of Education, Community, and Leisure, Liverpool John Moores University, IM Marsh Campus, Barkhill Road, Liverpool, UK

3 Department of Health Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Taggert Avenue, Liverpool, UK

4 Research Centre for Sports and Exercise Sciences, College of Engineering, University of Swansea, Swansea, UK

5 School of Sports Science, Exercise and Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

6 MRC Epidemiology Unit & UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2013, 13:626  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-626

Published: 2 July 2013

Abstract

Background

This pragmatic evaluation investigated the effectiveness of the Children’s Health, Activity and Nutrition: Get Educated! (CHANGE!) Project, a cluster randomised intervention to promote healthy weight using an educational focus on physical activity and healthy eating.

Methods

Participants (n = 318, aged 10–11 years) from 6 Intervention and 6 Comparison schools took part in the 20 weeks intervention between November 2010 and March/April 2011. This consisted of a teacher-led curriculum, learning resources, and homework tasks. Primary outcome measures were waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), and BMI z-scores. Secondary outcomes were objectively-assessed physical activity and sedentary time, and food intake. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, at post-intervention (20 weeks), and at follow-up (30 weeks). Data were analysed using 2-level multi-level modelling (levels: school, student) and adjusted for baseline values of the outcomes and potential confounders. Differences in intervention effect by subgroup (sex, weight status, socio-economic status) were explored using statistical interaction.

Results

Significant between-group effects were observed for waist circumference at post-intervention (β for intervention effect =−1.63 (95% CI = −2.20, -1.07) cm, p<0.001) and for BMI z-score at follow-up (β=−0.24 (95% CI = −0.48, -0.003), p=0.04). At follow-up there was also a significant intervention effect for light intensity physical activity (β=25.97 (95% CI = 8.04, 43.89) min, p=0.01). Interaction analyses revealed that the intervention was most effective for overweight/obese participants (waist circumference: β=−2.82 (95% CI = −4.06, -1.58) cm, p<0.001), girls (BMI: β=−0.39 (95% CI = −0.81, 0.03) kg/m2, p=0.07), and participants with higher family socioeconomic status (breakfast consumption: β=8.82 (95% CI = 6.47, 11.16), p=0.07).

Conclusions

The CHANGE! intervention positively influenced body size outcomes and light physical activity, and most effectively influenced body size outcomes among overweight and obese children and girls. The findings add support for the effectiveness of combined school-based physical activity and nutrition interventions. Additional work is required to test intervention fidelity and the sustained effectiveness of this intervention in the medium and long term.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03863885.

Keywords:
Body size; Light physical activity; Accelerometry; Multilevel modelling