Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ana Angelica Dias |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 13 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ana Angelica Dias |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gunnar Aksel Bjune |
| 26 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tereza Villa |
| 4 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Bissell |
| 8 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Britt Hedman Ahlström |
| 29 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Ana Angelica Dias |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 7 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tereza Villa |
| 28 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Britt Hedman Ahlström |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 31 May 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Jun 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-595 |
You can find further information about peer review here.