Table 3

Logistic regression results of men, Zhejiang metabolic syndrome prevalence survey, China, 2010 a
Independents d General overweight & obesity b Abdominal overweight & obesity c
SES: Education level[Contrast: primary or lower] Model 1(Step1) Model 1(Step 2) Model 2(Step1) Model 2(Step 2)
  Secondary 1.30(1.16,1.45)** 1.24(1.11,1.38) ** 1.28(1.15,1.42) ** 1.21(1.09,1.35) **
  Advanced 1.46(1.14,1.87) ** 1.27(0.99,1.63) 1.26(0.99,1.62) 1.12(0.87,1.44)
 Married [Contrast: unmarried, divorced and widowed] 1.41(1.17,1.70) ** 1.40(1.16,1.70) ** 1.45(1.21,1.75) ** 1.43(1.19,1.72) **
 Present smoker[Contrast: ex-smoker& non-smoker] 0.66(0.60,0.73) ** 0.77(0.70,0.85) **
 Present drinker[Contrast: ex-drinker& non-drinker] 1.05(0.95,1.16) 1.02(0.93,1.13)
 Physically active[Contrast: physically inactive] 0.72(0.65,0.81) ** 0.70(0.63,0.79) **
 High fat intake[Contrast: low ] 1.02(0.92,1.12) 1.00(0.91,1.10)
 High meat intake[Contrast: low ] 1.15(1.05,1.27) ** 1.12(1.02,1.24) *
 High fruits & vegetables intake[Contrast: low ] 1.19(1.08,1.31) ** 1.21(1.10,1.33) **
SES: Income level[contrast: low] Model 3(Step1) Model 3(Step 2) Model 4(Step1) Model 4(Step 2)
  Medium 1.24(1.10,1.40) ** 1.20(1.06,1.35) ** 1.17(1.04,1.32) * 1.15(1.01,1.29) *
  High 1.42(1.27,1.60) ** 1.35(1.20,1.51) ** 1.49(1.33,1.67) ** 1.42(1.26,1.59) **
 Married [Contrast: unmarried, divorced and widowed] 1.40(1.16,1.69) ** 1.40(1.16,1.69) ** 1.44(1.20,1.73) ** 1.43(1.19,1.72) **
 Present smoker[Contrast: ex-smoker& non-smoker] 0.66(0.60,0.73) ** 0.77(0.70,0.86) *
 Present drinker[Contrast: ex-drinker& non-drinker] 1.06(0.95,1.17) 1.03(0.93,1.13)
 Physically active[Contrast: physically inactive] 0.74(0.66,0.82) ** 0.72(0.65,0.81) **
 High fat intake[Contrast: low ] 1.03(0.93,1.13) 1.02(0.92,1.12)
 High meat intake[Contrast: low ] 1.13(1.02,1.25) * 1.09(0.99,1.20)
 High fruits & vegetables intake[Contrast: low ] 1.22(1.11,1.34) ** 1.24(1.13,1.36) **

a All presented values are ORs with 95% confidence intervals b Defined as BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2c Defined as WC ≥ 85 cm.

d Age and age2 were included in every model *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01.

Xiao et al.

Xiao et al. BMC Public Health 2013 13:355   doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-355

Open Data