Table 3

Total adolescents, boys, and girls reporting problems in anxiety dimension (EQ-5D), before and 1 year after screening-detected celiac disease diagnosis, compared to referents without celiac disease
Groups at Baseline and Follow-up Screening-detected CD (cases) Non CD (referents) Odds Ratios (95% CI)a
n (%) with problems n (%) with problems Bivariate LRb Multivariate LRc
Total n = 103 n = 483
Baseline 13 (12.6) 52 (10.8) 0.84 (0.44-1.60) 1.37 (0.70-2.69)
Follow-up 15 (14.6) 95 (19.7) 0.70 (0.39-1.26) 0.65 (0.35-1.20)
Boys n = 47 n = 208
Baseline 4 (8.5) 16 (7.7) 1.12 (0.36-3.51) 1.46 (0.43-4.95)
Follow-up 2 (4.3) 18 (8.7) 0.47 (0.11-2.10) 0.41 (0.08-1.98)
Girls n = 56 n = 275
Baseline 9 (16.1) 36 (13.1) 1.27 (0.57-2.81) 1.38 (0.61-3.13)
Follow-up 13 (23.2) 77 (28.0) 0.78 (0.40-1.53) 0.73 (0.37-1.47)

a Odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

b Bivariate logistic regression using case/referent and problems reported.

c Multivariate logistic regression using case/referent and problems reported at baseline and problems reported at follow-up.

Nordyke et al.

Nordyke et al. BMC Public Health 2013 13:142   doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-142

Open Data