Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Bellis |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keshia Pollack |
13 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathaniel Bell |
17 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Ting |
17 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Bellis |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
29 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Bellis |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
29 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
30 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-746 |
You can find further information about peer review here.