Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: a systematic review

Andrew P Black1*, Julie Brimblecombe2, Helen Eyles3, Peter Morris2, Hassan Vally4 and Kerin O′Dea1

Author affiliations

1 Sansom Institute for Health Research, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

2 Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia

3 National Institute for Health Innovation, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

4 School of Public Health and Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC Public Health 2012, 12:1099  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1099

Published: 21 December 2012

Abstract

Background

Less healthy diets are common in high income countries, although proportionally higher in those of low socio-economic status. Food subsidy programs are one strategy to promote healthy nutrition and to reduce socio-economic inequalities in health. This review summarises the evidence for the health and nutritional impacts of food subsidy programs among disadvantaged families from high income countries.

Methods

Relevant studies reporting dietary intake or health outcomes were identified through systematic searching of electronic databases. Cochrane Public Health Group guidelines informed study selection and interpretation. A narrative synthesis was undertaken due to the limited number of studies and heterogeneity of study design and outcomes.

Results

Fourteen studies were included, with most reporting on the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children in the USA. Food subsidy program participants, mostly pregnant or postnatal women, were shown to have 10–20% increased intake of targeted foods or nutrients. Evidence for the effectiveness of these programs for men or children was lacking. The main health outcome observed was a small but clinically relevant increase in mean birthweight (23–29g) in the two higher quality WIC studies.

Conclusions

Limited high quality evidence of the impacts of food subsidy programs on the health and nutrition of adults and children in high income countries was identified. The improved intake of targeted nutrients and foods, such as fruit and vegetables, could potentially reduce the rate of non-communicable diseases in adults, if the changes in diet are sustained. Associated improvements in perinatal outcomes were limited and most evident in women who smoked during pregnancy. Thus, food subsidy programs for pregnant women and children should aim to focus on improving nutritional status in the longer term. Further prospective studies and economic analyses are needed to confirm the health benefits and justify the investment in food subsidy programs.

Keywords:
Food subsidy; Disadvantaged families; Health outcomes; Dietary intake; Nutritional status