Table 4

Changes in intermediate condom use outcomes and HIV and STI prevalence among FSWs in Andhra Pradesh

IBBA R1

N=3271

IBBA R2

N=3225

Crude OR (95% CI)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P value (Wald test)

No reported unprotected sex with commercial clients in past month

59.4

81.8

3.070**

(2.49 - 3.78)

3.28

(2.57 - 4.18)

<0.001

Condom use last sex act occasional clients

91.3

97.8

4.18**

(2.99 – 5.84)

4.10

(2.79 – 6.02)

<0.001

"Every time" condom use with occasional clients

70.8

83.7

2.19**

(1.77 – 2.72)

2.20

(1.75 – 2.81)

<0.001

Condom use last sex act regular client

85.0

95.9

4.08**

(2.90 – 5.76)

3.61

(2.40 – 5.44)

<0.001

"Every time" condom use with regular clients

63.6

83.4

2.88**

(2.32 – 3.58)

2.98

(2.29 - 3.88)

<0.001

Last time condom use with regular partner

19.2

16.9

0.86

(0.55 – 1.32)

0.99

(0.68 – 1.43)

0.99

"Every time" condom use with regular partners

8.9

8.5

0.95

(0.59 – 1.53)

1.10

(0.66 – 1.85)

0.70

HIV prevalence

17.7

13.2

0.71*

(0.52-0.96)

0.68

(0.51-0.90)

<0.01

Syphilis infection

10.8

6.1

0.54**

(0.35 – 0.83)

0.39

(0.25-0.60)

<0.001

High-titre syphilis

3.2

3.1

0.98

(0.45-2.12)

0.45

(0.22-0.90)

0.03

Chlamydia infection

3.5

3.5

1.00

(0.69 – 1.45)

0.96

(0.61 – 1.49)

0.85

Gonorrhoea infection

2.2

2.8

1.28

(0.77 – 2.15)

1.22

(0.68 – 2.19)

0.49

**<0.01 *<0.05. Multivariate models were adjusted for the following variables: District, Literacy, Marital Status, additional sources of income, Locality status, Duration in sex work, Usual place of solicitation, Usual place of entertaining clients, No. of Clients per week and Proportion of FSWs with regular partners

Rachakulla et al. BMC Public Health 2011 11(Suppl 6):S1   doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-S6-S1