Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Valeria Saraceni |
6 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andre Perisse |
9 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Pacheco |
21 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ceuci Nunes |
20 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Líbia Moura |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
26 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Valeria Saraceni |
5 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andre Perisse |
13 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Pacheco |
22 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Líbia Moura |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Líbia Moura |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
28 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Líbia Moura |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
28 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
5 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-687 |
You can find further information about peer review here.