Currently is not feasible using conventional spirometry as a screening method in Primary Care especially among smoking population to detect chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in early stages. Therefore, the FUMEPOC study protocol intends to analyze the validity and reliability of Vitalograph COPD-6 spirometer as simpler tool to aid screening and diagnosis of this disease in early stages in primary care surgery.
Methods / Design
Study design: An observational, descriptive study of diagnostic tests, undertaken in Primary Care and Pneumology Outpatient Care Centre at San Juan Hospital and Elda Hospital. All smokers attending the primary care surgery and consent to participate in the study will undergo a test with Vitalograph COPD-6 spirometer. Subsequently, a conventional spirometry will be performed in the hospital and the results will be compared with those of the Vitalograph COPD-6 test.
It is difficult to use the spirometry as screening for early diagnose test in real conditions of primary care clinical practice. The use of a simpler tool, Vitalograph COPD-6 spirometer, can help in the early diagnose and therefore, it could improve the clinical management of the disease.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is defined as a preventable and treatable disease with some significant extrapulmonary effects that may contribute to the severity of symptoms in individual patients. Its pulmonary component is characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. The airflow limitation is usually progressive and associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lung to noxious particles and gases .
The association between tobacco and COPD is well known and the best option to prevent a high risk of suffering from COPD for these patients is to quit this smoking habit .
By means of epidemiological studies it has been quantified that COPD is a common problem and that the fact of being under-diagnosed and undertreated makes its prognosis worse [3-7]. COPD is usually classified in 4 stages according to its severity. The latest evidences in COPD have proven that early detection in stages 1 and specially in stage 2 achieve significant improvements in the natural history of the disease [8,9].
Spirometry is currently the standard assessment tool for diagnosing, staging and monitoring disease progression. It is considered the most objective and reproducible measurement of airflow limitation .
The ratio of the two measurements (FEV1 ⁄ FVC) is calculated to assess a patient's lung function. In patients with COPD, FEV1 and FVC readings, as well as FEV1 ⁄ FVC ratios, will be lower than predicted (reference) values based on age, sex, height and race. Airflow limitation is clinically confirmed when the FEV1 ⁄ FVC postbronchodilator value is < 0.70 .
Various types of spirometers may be used in assessing and monitoring COPD. But conventional spirometry is difficult to use in primary care because lack of time and need of specific training. Recently other types of spirometers have been introduced that are portable, readily available, and easy to use in primary-care settings. With lower needs of instruction and training in spirometry techniques, healthcare providers can easily incorporate spirometry into their practices and increase the likelihood of earlier detection of COPD among their patients 
Therefore, it was decided to develop this study in order to establish the validity and reliability of Vitalograph COPD-6 spirometer (COPD-6), and to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed COPD in smokers.
The COPD-6 identifies likely cases of COPD by measuring patients' obstructive index and FEV1/FEV6 ratio. Those whose measurements are within normal range can be screened out, allowing diagnostic spirometry resources to be focussed on those most at risk. A previous study about COPD shows acceptable validity indexes but another one shows low sensitivity [11,12].
Methods / Design
To establish the validity and reliability of COPD-6 compared with conventional spirometry (CS).
1. To determine the prevalence of undiagnosed COPD in smokers.
2. To establish the saving times in the primary care setting by using COPD-6 before CS instead of CS only.
FUMEPOC is an observational descriptive study of diagnostic tests.
The sample will be recruited from the province of Alicante (Spain) and, specifically, the population receiving healthcare from 5 primary care surgeries at Elda Health Department and San Juan Health Department. So 5 Health centres and 2 Hospitals were involved.
Patients 45 years of age and over who are smokers with a pack-year index greater than 10, without known respiratory disease attending a primary care consultation will be included (Table 1). Patients who refuse to perform spirometry or not giving in the informed consent were excluded.
Table 1. Criteria to include patients in the FUMEPOC study
Patients undergo a test with Vitalograph COPD-6 spirometer. Subsequently, a spirometry (Datospir-120) will be performed as the gold standard test at the reference hospital and the results will be compared. Patients with acute respiratory disease will make the both tests in a different day once the acute disease has disappeared (at least 6 weeks after acute disease).
For sample size calculating, after bibliography searching, high variability in sensitivity and specificity criteria was found. For that reason we assume the maximum uncertainty. Thus, the sample size is calculated by accepting a sensitivity or specificity = 50%. A 95% confidence level and a 5% precision are assumed. Because of the characteristics of the transversal design of the study, in which patients are screened by the regular family physician, and the absence of complex tests or high-risk tests, we suppose a low percent loss. Therefore we assume a 20% loss. According these assumptions, approximately 480 patients will be needed. Calculations are made with qualitative variables formula for infinite populations in the estimation of a validation parameter (sensitivity / specificity), subsequently the correction formula is applied.
Methods of Data Collection
The number of primary care physicians (PCP) who will participate in the study should be about 40. Each PCP will be trained on the screening tool (COPD-6) and after that will select 10 consecutive patients from daily clinical practice who meet the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Once the patient is included, PCP applied the screening test and asks the patient about some related variables (Table 2). All included patients (screening positive or negative) will be referred to perform the gold standard test, CS, to be done at the reference Hospital of San Juan or Elda. Figure 1 provides a flow diagram of the study.
COPD will be diagnosed according to the most widely accepted criteria, that is, FEV1/FVC < 0.7 and a history of smoking habit. The severity of COPD will be determined according to the GOLD criteria: I (FEV1 > 80%, II (FEV1: 50-80%), III (FEV1: 30-49%); IV (FEV1 < 30%)
Vitalograph COPD-6 spirometer. Interpretation of the results
The following results were considered: NORMAL (FEV1/FEV6 > 0,7), STAGE I: Mild (FEV1/FEV6 < 0,7 y FEV1 > 80%), STAGE II (FEV1/FEV6 < 0,7 y FEV1 < 80%), STAGE III (FEV1/FEV6 < 0,7 y FEV1 < 50%) and STAGE IV: Severe (FEV1/FEV6 < 0,7 y FEV1 < 30%).
Table 2 shows all the study variables and the collection method. Smoking status will be measured according to WHO's Smoking and tobacco Use Policy. A smoker is defined as someone who smokes any tobacco product, either daily or occasionally.
Univariate and bivariate analysis will be performed to describe the variables and to analyze validity indicators. For those related to the spyrometers' screening, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) and likelihood ratio will be calculated; for the values of the diagnostic tests which follow a quantitative scale the ROC curve (receiver operating characteristic) will be used in order to facilitate the cut-off point.
Confidence interval is used at 95% for all variables.
Ethical and Legal Issues
The FUMEPOC study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Committee for Ethics and Clinical Trials of San Juan Hospital (Comite Ético de Investigación Clínica (CEIC) de Hospital de San Juan)
The study is conducted according to the standards of the International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences- CIOMS-Geneva, 1991) and the recommendations of the Spanish Society of Epidemiology about the review of ethical aspects of epidemiological research.
Confidentiality of the data
All information relative to the patient's identity is considered confidential. The data generated during the study will be handled according to the Spanish Law 5/1999 and corresponding norms. All of the researchers will be required to sign a confidentiality agreement in order to access the study data.
All patients must read the "Patient Information Form" and sign a document giving in consent.
COPD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and results in an economic and social burden that is both substantial and increasing. The prevalence and morbidity data greatly underestimate the total burden of COPD because the disease is usually not diagnosed until it is clinically apparent and moderately advanced .
Currently, COPD is a more costly disease than asthma and, depending on country 50-75% of the costs are for health services associated with exacerbations. Tobacco smoke is by far the most important risk factor for COPD worldwide. Other important risk factors are occupational exposures, socio-economic status and genetic predisposition .
COPD is the fourth-leading cause of death in the USA and Europe, and COPD mortality in females has more than doubled over the last 20 yrs .
This study is developed in the Health Departments of San Juan and Elda (Alicante, Spain), with enough research personnel and material resources for its implementation (spirometers-CS-, COPD-6 spirometers, clinical rooms, and others). Family doctors of these Departments will perform the study once a training course was made.
An early diagnosis of COPD is important, since depending on the stage in which it is made, different treatments or actions can be applied. This is important because currently there are no treatments that can reverse the natural history of disease in later stages [6,7].
Some limits of this diagnostic tests study are related to those from diagnostic observational studies for the validation of a measure device, such as diagnosed verification bias. It must be taken into account to consider the validity of the results.
In order to solve some kind of bias some measures will be taken. Both tests should be applied to all patients (positive and negative screening results) in order to obtain the diagnoses confirmation or not in all cases.
Patients were selected from Primary care setting by their family doctors so the percentage of non-responders is expected to be low avoiding selection bias.
This study includes only smokers because of the increased risk for COPD but in the future and depending on the results a second phase will be conducted with ex-smokers.
The "gold standard test" should be applied blindly to the evaluator that is not aware of the outcome of the screening test in order to avoid information bias. So that, the COPD6 result will be not included in the petition sheet of spirometry in the hospital and the result of screening will be not given to the patient until both tests have been performed. So a final report on the results of the two tests will be sent to patients.
Prior to the start of the study reproducibility of the test must be assessed. A poorly reproducible test may affect the validity of the results. In our study the screening instrument COPD-6, is a perfectly reproducible test in patients with different clinical and pathological states.
Regarding "gold standard" selection, Conventional Spirometry is the gold standard for diagnosing the disease and monitoring its progression as it is non-invasive, standardised, reproducible, and objective. Functional diagnosis of COPD is important for identifying and quantifying airflow limitation, reversibility, disease severity and exacerbations. Functional diagnosis is also important for long-term therapeutic monitoring and for establishing the need for pulmonary rehabilitation .
Spirometry ought to be used in primary care as a screening tool for the early detection of COPD in all patients > 45 years of age who are currently smoking, as well as those with respiratory symptoms .
But Spirometry is difficult to use widely in PC setting. To implement screening tools in primary care it needs to be trough a simpler, cheaper test because of the primary care clinic conditions .
Spirometry enables the primary care health professional to make an objective measurement of airflow limitation and the degree to which it is reversible, and is an important tool for accurate diagnosis and effective management of chronic respiratory diseases including asthma and COPD . However, spirometry remains underused in primary care [18,19]. Barriers to performing spirometry in community settings include lack of access to calibrated spirometers, inadequate training in performing spirometry, price of conventional spirometers, lack of quality-control systems to ensure accurate results, and inadequate interpretation skills among health professionals performing the test [20,21].
Having a simple screening tool adapted to the primary care setting would detect COPD in early stages and the number of patients referred to CS will be lower. It could help to establish a protocol to facilitate high risk people screening with high rates of compliance. This is an effort in terms of prevention, which can result in fewer later stages cases of the disease and consequently, better quality of life for patients. In addition it could help savings for the healthcare burden.
COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; ROC: Receiver operating characteristics; PCP: Primary care physicians; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; BMI: Body mass index; CS: Conventional spirometry
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
VG, DO and CVCM participated in the design of the study. VG, DO, CVCM, CP, PL, AL, and MPV contributed to the protocol development. CP, PL, AL, and MPV participated in the manuscript writing. JJS, MY, LR, CO, AM and AF contributed to the manuscript review.
All the authors have read the draft critically, to make contributions, and have approved the final text.
Acknowledgements and Funding
This project was supported by an unrestricted grant from Exilio SI S.L.
We gratefully thank FUMEPOC Study Research Team (Adoración Revert Algarra, Adriana López Pineda, Alejandro Muñoz Fernández, Alfredo Ruiz Paterna, Andrés Vicente Genovés Espulgues, Antonio Fernández, Antonio Llerena Herance, Antonio Medina Toro, Antonio Palacios del Cerro, Antonio Torrente Blasco, Asunción Antolín Llenares, Carlos Botella Estrada, Carlos Plaza Sirvent, Carmen Gallego Gonzalez, Carmen Gómez Martín, Concepción Albert Martínez, Concepción Carratalá Munuera, Damián Crespí Capó, Domingo Orozco Beltrán, Enrique Hermida Campa, Ernesto Viñes Martinez, Eugenio Mira Ramos, Fernando Díaz González, Francisco Ponce Lorenzo, Isabel Pastor Martínez, Joaquín Oriente Pérez, Jose Antonio Paradinas Rubio, Jose Luis Martínez Lázaro, Jose Mª Herrero de la Vega, Jose Vicente Vaquer Pérez, Juan Carlos Deltell Llorens, Juan José Soler, Juan Luis Hernández Juan, Luis Maestre Amat, Luis Rosado Bretón, Manuel Yarza Cañellas, Mª Carmen Martínez Suay, Mª Isabel Boix Vera, Mª Isabel Fernández Estébanez, Mª Pilar Vela Troncoso, Mª Rosa Saez Fernández, Manuel Cano Arjona, Manuel Carlos Salas Tomás, Marisa Asensio García, Miguel Angel García Lillo, Miguel Cuenca Navarro, Olga Mabel Siva Aguiar, Patricia López Anaya, Patricia Lorca Amorrich, Raquel Albert Muñoz, Roberto Jorge Jover Rico, Rosa Pastor López, Salvador Aguilar Pérez, Soledad García Beviá, Tertuliano Amat Sotos, Vicente Gil Guillén, Virginia García Gil) for undertaking the study.
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD): Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. [http://www.goldcopd.com/Guidelineitem.asp?l1=2&l2=1&intId=989] webcite
Accessed May 2011
Eur Respir J 2004, 23(6):932-46.
Erratum in: Eur Respir J. 2006 Jan;27(1):242. PubMed PMID: 15219010PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Arch Bronconeumol 2004, 40(4):155-9.
Spanish. PubMed PMID: 15,030,729PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Lin K, Watkins B, Johnson T, Rodriguez JA, Barton MB, US Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for chronic pulmonary obstructive disease using spirometry: summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Ann Intern Med 2008, 148(7):535-43.
Epub 2008 Mar3. Review. PubMed PMID: 18,316,746PubMed Abstract
Ann Intern Med 2008, 148(7):529-34.
Epub 2008 Mar3. PubMed PMID: 18,316,747PubMed Abstract
Curr Med Res Opin 2009, 25(5):1235-45.
PubMed PMID: 19,335,322PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Averame G, Bonavia M, Ferri P, Moretti AM, Fogliani V, Cricelli C, Canonica GW, Grassi C, Paggiaro PL, Rossi A, "Alliance Project" Study Group: Office spirometry can improve the diagnosis of obstructive airway disease in primary care setting.
Respir Med 2009, 103(6):866-72.
Epub 2009 Feb 6. PubMed PMID: 19,200,705PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Respir Care 2003, 48(12):1194-201.
discussion 1201-3. Review. PubMed PMID: 14,651,760PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
PubMed PMID: 16,945,262PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Respir Med 2007, 101(3):525-30.
Epub 2006 Aug 14PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Arch Bronconeumol 2010, 46(8):426-32.
Epub 2010 Jun 8PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Ann Ist Super Sanita 2003, 39(4):529-47.
Review. Italian. PubMed PMID: 15098574PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Chest 2000, 117(4):1146-61.
Review. PubMed PMID: 10767253PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Chest 2005, 127(5):1560-4.
PubMed PMID: 15,888,828PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Eur Respir J 2008, 31(5):943-8.
Epub 2008 Jan 23. PubMed PMID: 18,216,059PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Int J Clin Pract 2008, 62(8):1219-36.
Epub 2008 Jun 28. Review. PubMed PMID: 18,547,365PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
COPD 2005, 2(4):419-25.
PubMed PMID: 17,147,007PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Prim Care Respir J 2009, 18(3):216-23.
PubMed PMID: 19688142PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
The Cochrane Library Oxford: Update Software Ltd; 2008., (4)
(Translated from The Cochrane Library 2008 Issue 3. [Accessed January 2011.]
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: