Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Does directly observed therapy (DOT) reduce drug resistant tuberculosis?

Patrick K Moonan127, Teresa N Quitugua3, Janice M Pogoda14, Gary Woo5, Gerry Drewyer12, Behzad Sahbazian12, Denise Dunbar6, Kenneth C Jost6, Charles Wallace6 and Stephen E Weis126*

Author Affiliations

1 University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Department of Medicine, Fort Worth, TX, USA

2 Tarrant County Health Department, Fort Worth, TX, USA

3 University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, San Antonio, TX, USA

4 Statology, Ventura, CA, USA

5 Dallas County Health And Human Services, Dallas, TX, USA

6 Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA

7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2011, 11:19  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-19

Published: 7 January 2011

Abstract

Background

Directly observed therapy (DOT) is a widely recommended and promoted strategy to manage tuberculosis (TB), however, there is still disagreement about the role of DOT in TB control and the impact it has on reducing the acquisition and transmission of drug resistant TB. This study compares the portion of drug resistant genotype clusters, representing recent transmission, within and between communities implementing programs differing only in their directly observed therapy (DOT) practices.

Methods

Genotype clusters were defined as 2 or more patient members with matching IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and spoligotype patterns from all culture-positive tuberculosis cases diagnosed between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2001. Logistic regression was used to compute maximum-likelihood estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing cluster members with and without drug resistant isolates. In the universal DOT county, all patients received doses under direct observation of health department staff; whereas in selective DOT county, the majority of received patients doses under direct observation of health department staff, while some were able to self-administer doses.

Results

Isolates from 1,706 persons collected during 1,721 episodes of tuberculosis were genotyped. Cluster members from the selective DOT county were more than twice as likely than cluster members from the universal DOT county to have at least one isolate resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, and/or ethambutol (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.7, 3.1). Selective DOT county isolates were nearly 5 times more likely than universal DOT county isolates to belong to clusters with at least 2 resistant isolates having identical resistance patterns (OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 2.9, 7.6).

Conclusions

Universal DOT for tuberculosis is associated with a decrease in the acquisition and transmission of resistant tuberculosis.