Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

CT scan screening is associated with increased distress among subjects of the APExS

Christophe Paris12*, Marion Maurel3, Amandine Luc2, Audrey Stoufflet2, Jean-Claude Pairon45 and Marc Letourneux6

Author Affiliations

1 Nancy University Hospital, 54000 Nancy, France

2 INSERM 954, 54505 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy Cedex - France

3 EA 2304, 93526 Saint-Denis Cedex, France

4 INSERM, Unité 955, F-94010 Creteil, France

5 CHI Creteil, F-94010 Creteil, France

6 University Hospital. Occupational diseases Dept. 14031 Caen Cedex, France

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2010, 10:647  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-647

Published: 26 October 2010

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the psychological consequences of HRCT scan screening in retired asbestos-exposed workers.

Methods

A HRCT-scan screening program for asbestos-related diseases was carried out in four regions of France. At baseline (T1), subjects filled in self-administered occupational questionnaires. In two of the regions, subjects also received a validated psychological scale, namely the psychological consequences questionnaire (PCQ). The physician was required to provide the subject with the results of the HRCT scan at a final visit. A second assessment of psychological consequences was performed 6 months after the HRCT-scan examination (T2). PCQ scores were compared quantitatively (t-test, general linear model) and qualitatively (chi²-test, logistic regression) to screening results. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for gender, age, smoking, asbestos exposure and counseling.

Results

Among the 832 subjects included in this psychological impact study, HRCT-scan screening was associated with a significant increase of the psychological score 6 months after the examination relative to baseline values (8.31 to 10.08, p < 0.0001, t-test). This increase concerned patients with an abnormal HRCT-scan result, regardless of the abnormalities, but also patients with normal HRCT-scans after adjustment for age, gender, smoking status, asbestos exposure and counseling visit. The greatest increase was observed for pleural plaques (+3.60; 95%CI [+2.15;+5.06]), which are benign lesions. Detection of isolated pulmonary nodules was also associated with a less marked but nevertheless significant increase of distress (+1.88; 95%CI [+0.34;+3.42]). However, analyses based on logistic regressions only showed a close to significant increase of the proportion of subjects with abnormal PCQ scores at T2 for patients with asbestosis (OR = 1.92; 95%CI [0.97-3.81]) or with two or more diseases (OR = 2.04; 95%CI [0.95-4.37]).

Conclusion

This study suggests that HRCT-scan screening may be associated with increased distress in asbestos-exposed subjects. If confirmed, these results may have consequences for HRCT-scan screening recommendations.