Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 11 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Eisenberg |
| 17 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Thielke |
| 9 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna Christensson |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Thielke |
| 28 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Eisenberg |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 7 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna Christensson |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 7 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 13 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna Christensson |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 13 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| 14 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna Christensson |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 14 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 15 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 15 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-343 |
You can find further information about peer review here.