Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 May 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sharon Stancliff |
| 21 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dan Ciccarone |
| 1 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Josiah Rich |
| 26 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 16 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dan Ciccarone |
| 25 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 2 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Kerr |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 2 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-327 |
You can find further information about peer review here.