Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Psychiatry and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Psychometric properties of the cardiac depression scale in patients with coronary heart disease

Litza A Kiropoulos123*, Ian Meredith45, Andrew Tonkin6, David Clarke7, Paul Antonis8 and Julie Plunkett8

Author affiliations

1 Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia

2 Psychology Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia

3 School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia

4 MonashHeart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia

5 Department of Medicine, Monash University, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia

6 Cardiovascular Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia

7 School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia

8 MonashHeart and Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC Psychiatry 2012, 12:216  doi:10.1186/1471-244X-12-216

Published: 3 December 2012

Abstract

Background

This study examined the psychometric properties of the Cardiac Depression Scale (CDS) in a sample of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients.

Methods

A total of 152 patients were diagnosed with coronary heart disease and were administered the CDS along with the Beck Depression Inventory- 2 (BDI-2) and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) 3.5-months after cardiac hospitalization.

Results

The CDS’s factorial composition in the current sample was similar to that observed in the original scale. Varimax-rotated principal-components analyses extracted six factors, corresponding to mood, anhedonia, cognition, fear, sleep and suicide. Reliability analyses yielded internal consistency α - coefficients for the six subscales ranging from 0.62 to 0.82. The CDS showed strong concurrent validity with the BDI-II (r = 0.64). More patients were classified as severely depressed using the CDS. Both the CDS and the BDI-2 displayed significantly strong correlations with the STAI (r = 0.61 and r = 0.64), respectively.

Conclusions

These findings encourage the use of the CDS for measuring the range of depressive symptoms in those with CHD 3.5 months after cardiac hospitalization.

Keywords:
Cardiac depression scale; Depression; Coronary heart disease; Validity; Reliability; Psychometric properties