Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 May 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Puliyel |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
12 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Puliyel |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Puliyel |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
19 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Smith |
28 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Puliyel |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
4 Dec 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Smith |
3 Jan 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Puliyel |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
3 Jan 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
5 Jan 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Puliyel |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
5 Jan 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
18 Jan 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Puliyel |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
18 Jan 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
19 Jan 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Jan 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-7-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.