Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Pediatrics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

How to minimize children’s environmental tobacco smoke exposure: an intervention in a clinical setting in high risk areas

Noomi Carlsson12*, AnnaKarin Johansson3, Agneta Abrahamsson4 and Boel Andersson Gäre156

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden

2 Department of Public Health and Medical Care, Jönköping County Council, Box 1024, SE-551 11 Jönköping, Sweden

3 Department of Medicine and Health, Division of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden

4 Department of Health and Society, University College of Kristianstad, SE-291 88, Kristianstad, Sweden

5 Futurum – the Academy for Healthcare, Jönköping County Council, SE-551 85, Jönköping, Sweden

6 The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Box 1026, SE-551 11 Jönköping,Sweden

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Pediatrics 2013, 13:76  doi:10.1186/1471-2431-13-76

Published: 15 May 2013

Abstract

Background

Despite the low prevalence of daily smokers in Sweden, children are still being exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), primarily by their smoking parents. A prospective intervention study using methods from Quality Improvement was performed in Child Health Care (CHC). The aim was to provide nurses with new methods for motivating and supporting parents in their efforts to protect children from ETS exposure.

Method

Collaborative learning was used to implement and test an intervention bundle. Twenty-two CHC nurses recruited 86 families with small children which had at least one smoking parent. Using a bundle of interventions, nurses met and had dialogues with the parents over a one-year period. A detailed questionnaire on cigarette consumption and smoking policies in the home was answered by the parents at the beginning and at the end of the intervention, when children also took urine tests to determine cotinine levels.

Results

Seventy-two families completed the study. Ten parents (11%) quit smoking. Thirty-two families (44%) decreased their cigarette consumption. Forty-five families (63%) were outdoor smokers at follow up. The proportion of children with urinary cotinine values of >6 ng/ml had decreased.

Conclusion

The intensified tobacco prevention in CHC improved smoking parents’ ability to protect their children from ETS exposure.

Keywords:
Children; Child Health Care; Tobacco smoke prevention; Passive smoking