Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
31 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
29 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Graham |
11 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Berkley |
15 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden |
13 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peace Imani |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
13 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peace Imani |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
20 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peace Imani |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
20 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
24 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Graham |
16 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden |
28 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peace Imani |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
28 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
13 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Peace Imani |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
13 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
14 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.