Peer Review reports
From: Pro- and antisaccades in children elicited by visual and acoustic targets - does modality matter?
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Zoi Kapoula |
22 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esther G Gonzalez |
9 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanna Goepel |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
9 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esther G Gonzalez |
9 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Zoi Kapoula |
9 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanna Goepel |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
9 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanna Goepel |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
19 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esther G Gonzalez |
13 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanna Goepel |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
16 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2431-11-116 |
You can find further information about peer review here.