Table 1 |
||
|
Detection rate of ductoscopy, galactography and cytology in comparison to histological results (n = 32, galactography was refused in one case) |
||
|
Intraductal, epithelial proliferations N = 23 |
No intraductal proliferations N = 9 |
|
|
|
||
|
Ductoscopy |
||
|
positive |
18 (78%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
||
|
negative |
2 (9%) |
4 (44%) |
|
|
||
|
False passage |
3 (13%) |
0 |
|
|
||
|
Galactography |
||
|
positive |
17 (74%) |
3(33%) |
|
|
||
|
negative |
2 (9%) |
5 (56%) |
|
|
||
|
not analysable |
4 (17%) |
1 (11%) |
|
|
||
|
Cytology |
||
|
positive |
1 (4%) |
1 (11%) |
|
|
||
|
negative |
20 (87%) |
8 (89%) |
|
|
||
|
not analysable |
2 (9%) |
0 |
|
|
||
|
Hahn et al. BMC Cancer 2009 9:151 doi:10.1186/1471-2407-9-151 |
||
