BMC Cancer Volume 7
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Research articleReal time contrast enhanced ultrasonography in detection of liver metastases from gastrointestinal cancerFabio Piscaglia1 , Francesco Corradi1 , Mikaela Mancini1 , Francesco Giangregorio2 , Stefano Tamberi3 , Giampaolo Ugolini4 , Bruno Cola5 , Alberto Bazzocchi1 , Roberto Righini1 , Patrizia Pini1 , Fabio Fornari2 and Luigi Bolondi1  1Div. Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy 2Div. Gastroenterology, Ospedale Pietro da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy 3Div. Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Faenza, Italy 4Div. Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy 5Div. General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy author email corresponding author email
BMC Cancer 2007,
7:171doi:10.1186/1471-2407-7-171
|
|
| Published: |
3 September 2007 |
Abstract
Background
Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an imaging technique which appeared on the market around the year 2000 and proposed for the detection of liver metastases in gastrointestinal cancer patients, a setting in which accurate staging plays a significant role in the choice of treatment.
Methods
A total of 109 patients with colorectal (n = 92) or gastric cancer prospectively underwent computed tomography (CT) scan and conventional US evaluation followed by real time CEUS. A diagnosis of metastases was made by CT or, for lesions not visibile at CT, the diagnosis was achieved by histopathology or by a malignant behavior during follow-up.
Results
Of 109 patients, 65 were found to have metastases at presentation. CEUS improved sensitivity in metastatic livers from 76.9% of patients (US) to 95.4% (p <0.01), while CT scan reached 90.8% (p = n.s. vs CEUS, p < 0.01 vs US). CEUS and CT were more sensitive than US also for detection of single lesions (87 with US, 122 with CEUS, 113 with CT). In 15 patients (13.8%), CEUS revealed more metastases than CT, while CT revealed more metastases than CEUS in 9 patients (8.2%) (p = n.s.).
Conclusion
CEUS is more sensitive than conventional US in the detection of liver metastases and could be usefully employed in the staging of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Findings at CEUS and CT appear to be complementary in achieving maximum sensitivity. |