Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Cancer and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Study protocol

Improving the quality and efficiency of follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer – rationale and study design of the MaCare trial

Merel L Kimman12*, Adri C Voogd3, Carmen D Dirksen4, Paul Falger5, Pierre Hupperets6, Kristien Keymeulen7, Marlene Hebly7, Cary Dehing1, Philippe Lambin128 and Liesbeth J Boersma128

Author Affiliations

1 Maastro Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands

2 Department GROW – MAASTRO, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

3 Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

4 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands

5 Department of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands

6 Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands

7 Department of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands

8 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Cancer 2007, 7:1  doi:10.1186/1471-2407-7-1

Published: 2 January 2007

Abstract

Background

After curative treatment for breast cancer women frequently attend scheduled follow-up examinations. Usually the follow-up is most frequent in the first 2–3 years (2–4 times a year); thereafter the frequency is reduced to once a year in most countries. Its main aim is to detect local disease recurrence, or a second primary breast cancer, but also to provide information and psychosocial support. However, the cost-effectiveness of these frequent visits is under much debate, leading to a search for less intensive and more cost-effective follow-up strategies.

In this paper the design of the MaCare trial is described. This trial compares the cost-effectiveness of four follow-up strategies for curatively treated breast cancer patients. We investigate the costs and effects of nurse-led telephone follow-up and a short educational group programme.

Methods/design

The MaCare trial is a multi centre randomised clinical trial in which 320 breast cancer patients are randomised into four follow-up strategies, focussed on the first 18 months after treatment: 1) standard follow-up; 2) nurse-led telephone follow-up; 3) arm 1 with the educational group programme; 4) arm 2 with the educational group programme. Data is collected at baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after treatment. The primary endpoint of the trial is cancer-specific quality of life as measured by the global health/QoL scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Secondary outcomes are perceived feelings of control, anxiety, patients' satisfaction with follow-up and costs. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a societal perspective.

Discussion

Reduced follow-up strategies for breast cancer have not yet been widely applied in clinical practice. Improvement of psychosocial support and information to patients could lead to a better acceptance of reduced follow-up. The MaCare trial combines a reduced follow-up strategy with additional psychosocial support. Less frequent follow-up can reduce the burden on medical specialists and costs. The educational group programme can improve QoL of patients, but also less frequent follow-up can improve QoL by reducing the anxiety experienced for each follow-up visit. Results of the trial will provide knowledge on both costs and psychosocial aspects regarding follow-up and are expected in 2009.