Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 19 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eric Solary |
| 21 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrea Tannapfel |
| 6 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Louis MERLIN |
| 18 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - rajani ravi |
| 20 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Daniel |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eric Solary |
| 9 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Louis MERLIN |
| 10 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Daniel |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Daniel |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 May 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 May 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-6-124 |
You can find further information about peer review here.