Open Access Research article

Genetic dissection of apoptosis and cell cycle control in response of colorectal cancer treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy

Isrid Sturm1, Beate Rau2, Peter M Schlag2, Peter Wust3, Bert Hildebrandt1, Hanno Riess1, Steffen Hauptmann4, Bernd Dörken1 and Peter T Daniel1*

Author Affiliations

1 University Medical Center Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Department of Hematology and Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany

2 University Medical Center Charité, Campus Buch, Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, 13125 Berlin, Germany

3 University Medical Center Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Department of Radiology, 13353 Berlin, Germany

4 University of Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Pathology, 06097 Halle, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Cancer 2006, 6:124  doi:10.1186/1471-2407-6-124

Published: 10 May 2006

Abstract

Background

In previous analyses we identified therapy-induced upregulation of the CDK inhibitor p21CIP/WAF-1 and consequently decreased tumor cell proliferation or loss of Bax as adverse factors for survival in rectal cancer treated with radiochemotherapy. Here, we address the individual role of p53 and its transcriptional targets, p21CIP/WAF-1 and Bax, on apoptosis induced by individual components of multimodal anticancer therapy, i.e. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), ionising γ-radiation (IR) and heat shock/hyperthermia.

Methods

We analysed tumor samples 66 patients with rectal carcinoma treated by a neoadjuvant approach with radiochemotherapy ± heat shock/hyperthermia for the expression and mutation of p53 and the expression of p21CIP/WAF-1 and Bax. These data were correlated with the tumor response. The functional relevance of p53, p21CIP/WAF-1 and Bax was investigated in isogeneic HCT116 cell mutants treated with 5-FU, IR and heat shock.

Results

Rectal carcinoma patients who received an optimal heat shock treatment showed a response that correlated well with Bax expression (p = 0.018). Local tumor response in the whole cohort was linked to expression of p21CIP/WAF-1 (p < 0.05), but not p53 expression or mutation. This dichotomy of p53 pathway components regulating response to therapy was confirmed in vitro. In isogeneic HCT116 cell mutants, loss of Bax but not p53 or p21CIP/WAF-1 resulted in resistance against heat shock. In contrast, loss of p21CIP/WAF-1 or, to a lesser extent, p53 sensitized predominantly for 5-FU and IR.

Conclusion

These data establish a different impact of p53 pathway components on treatment responses. While chemotherapy and IR depend primarily on cell cycle control and p21, heat shock depends primarily on Bax. In contrast, p53 status poorly correlates with response. These analyses therefore provide a rational approach for dissecting the mode of action of single treatment modalities that may be employed to circumvent clinically relevant resistance mechanisms in rectal cancer.