Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Cashin |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Melissa Teo |
26 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kurt Van der Speeten |
26 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ratna Vadlamudi |
22 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Cashin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Melissa Teo |
18 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Cashin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Cashin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
6 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Cashin |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
6 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
6 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Cashin |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
6 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
9 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Cashin |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
9 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
13 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Sep 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-13-435 |
You can find further information about peer review here.