Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Identification of epigenetically regulated genes that predict patient outcome in neuroblastoma

BMC Cancer volume 11, Article number: 66 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation and histone modifications are important regulators of gene expression and are frequently involved in silencing tumor suppressor genes.

Methods

In order to identify genes that are epigenetically regulated in neuroblastoma tumors, we treated four neuroblastoma cell lines with the demethylating agent 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-dC) either separately or in conjunction with the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA). Expression was analyzed using whole-genome expression arrays to identify genes activated by the treatment. These data were then combined with data from genome-wide DNA methylation arrays to identify candidate genes silenced in neuroblastoma due to DNA methylation.

Results

We present eight genes (KRT19, PRKCDBP, SCNN1A, POU2F2, TGFBI, COL1A2, DHRS3 and DUSP23) that are methylated in neuroblastoma, most of them not previously reported as such, some of which also distinguish between biological subsets of neuroblastoma tumors. Differential methylation was observed for the genes SCNN1A (p < 0.001), PRKCDBP (p < 0.001) and KRT19 (p < 0.01). Among these, the mRNA expression of KRT19 and PRKCDBP was significantly lower in patients that have died from the disease compared with patients with no evidence of disease (fold change -8.3, p = 0.01 for KRT19 and fold change -2.4, p = 0.04 for PRKCDBP).

Conclusions

In our study, a low methylation frequency of SCNN1A, PRKCDBP and KRT19 is significantly associated with favorable outcome in neuroblastoma. It is likely that analysis of specific DNA methylation will be one of several methods in future patient therapy stratification protocols for treatment of childhood neuroblastomas.

Peer Review reports

Background

Neuroblastoma (NB) is a pediatric tumor of the postganglionic sympathetic nervous system that develops from immature or de-differentiated neural crest-derived cells. It is the most common extracranial pediatric solid tumor, responsible for 15% of cancer deaths in childhood [1]. Much effort has been made to identify genes involved in the initiation/progression of NB. Tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) can be inactivated by mutations or deletions. Only infrequent mutations have been identified in neuroblastoma and homozygous deletions are rare events in primary NB tumors. Only a few have been reported in single cases [2–6]. Another mechanism for the inactivation of TSGs is epigenetic, where DNA methylation is the most studied. Several genes have been reported as being methylated in NB at different frequencies; for example the RASSF1A gene on chromosome arm 3p [7]. We have previously analyzed the methylation status of chromosome region 1p36 in NB, a region that is often heterozygously deleted in this tumor [8, 9]. The regulation of gene expression also involves several modifications of histones. Acetylation and deacetylation on histones H3 and H4 are regulated by histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC). One approach to identifying candidate genes that are regulated epigenetically is to treat cancer cell lines with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and/or histone deacetylase inhibitors, followed by an expression microarray analysis to identify genes that are upregulated by treatment. One advantage of this technique over direct methylation analysis is that it identifies epigenetic changes that also lead to a change in gene expression. One problem with this approach, however, is that several genes that are not methylated turn out to be positive for methylation, since these genes can be activated indirectly and not due to the demethylation of the respective gene. In this study, we have therefore combined a cell treatment study with a genome-wide DNA methylation analysis performed using the Illumina Human Methylation27 DNA analysis BeadChip to identify genes that are truly regulated by epigenetic mechanisms in NB cell lines and tumors. We selected a number of the identified genes and investigated them further; the selected genes were indeed methylated and the methylation frequencies of some of them were able to distinguish between different subgroups of NB tumors.

Results

The work flow of the analysis including samples used is described in Figure 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Work flow of the analysis. The figure describes the work flow of the analyses, samples used for respective analysis and gives a summary of all figures and additional files.

Full size image

Validity of methods

Several genes previously known to be epigenetically regulated were identified in the 5-Aza-dC and/or TSA expression microarray treatment experiment. ZMYND10 (BLU), THBS1 and SFN (14-3-3sigma) have previously been reported to be methylated in NB [10–12]. Moreover, imprinted genes (for example, NNAT and PEG3) were detected, as expected. All these genes were also identified as methylated by the Illumina Human Methylation27 DNA analysis BeadChips analysis. Since the methylation status of all these genes is already known, they were not analyzed further. See additional file 1 and 2 for the number of genes affected in the treatments and additional file 3 for lists of the affected genes. The data from the Illumina Human Methylation27 DNA analysis BeadChips have been validated elsewhere (Carén et al, in manuscript).

The NB cell lines showed great heterogeneity in the cell treatment experiments (additional file 4). The largest number of upregulated genes after 5-Aza-dC/TSA treatment was found in SK-N-BE (1617 probes upregulated >2-fold) followed by IMR-32 (1422), SK-N-AS (1182) and SK-N-DZ (875). The same pattern was seen after only 5-Aza-dC treatment (IMR-32, 591 probes upregulated, SK-N-AS 334 and SK-N-DZ 84). The low number of genes upregulated by treatment in SK-N-DZ is consistent with the finding that SK-N-DZ has the lowest number of methylated CpG sites with a beta value above 0.75 (above half the number as the other cell lines).

Selection of candidate genes

Genes were chosen as candidates for epigenetic regulation if they had a fold change of >2 between treated and untreated cell lines in at least one cell line. The common set of genes that was affected by both treatments was considered more likely to be true targets of epigenetic regulation and we therefore focused on this common set. Furthermore, genes that had no or only low expression in the untreated cell lines and that were affected by treatment, were considered as candidate genes. These data were combined with the Illumina methylation array data (Carén et al, in manuscript) and genes that also had a methylation beta value of more than 0.6 in primary NBs were selected. For the number of genes identified in the different steps, see additional file 2. The identified genes were examined for CpG islands using the UCSC genome browser and CpG island searcher. Ontology information was provided by the arrays; genes with functions related to cancer were selected. The gene lists were also used to search for NCBI abstracts using PubMatrix (URL: http://pubmatrix.grc.nia.nih.gov) with queries relating to neuroblastoma, methylation and tumorigenesis. After the bioinformatic analysis, nine genes were selected for further analysis, see Table 1 and additional file 5[13–37].

Table 1 Information of the genes studied in relation to tumorigenesis.
Full size table

Verification of the array data with expression analysis using real-time RT-PCR

The selected genes were analyzed in the same set and in another set of NB cell lines treated with 5-Aza-dC and/or TSA with real-time RT-PCR using TaqMan Technology. In most cases, there was a good correlation between the expression microarray data and the TaqMan data; when the gene was identified as upregulated by the array, it was generally also upregulated in the TaqMan analysis, although the magnitude of the values was not the same. Moreover, the new set of NB cell lines also showed upregulation of the genes after treatment (see additional file 6).

Bisulfite sequencing and methylation-specific PCR

On the Illumina methylation arrays, the CpG sites can be located inside or outside of the CpG islands of the corresponding gene. In order to verify that the CpG site analyzed with the array was indeed methylated, or to ensure that, for the genes with the CpG sites outside the CpG islands, the corresponding CpG island was also methylated and to confirm that the surrounding CpG sites were methylated, bisulfite sequencing assays were designed. All genes were found to have methylated promoter CpG islands. The bisulfite sequencing analysis included DNA from NB cell lines, normal adrenal and blood lymphocytes from healthy blood donors for all the genes, as well as primary NB tumors (n = 13-34) for three of the genes (SCNN1A, POU2F2 and COL1A2). All the analyzed genes were unmethylated or showed low methylation in the adrenal sample, as well as in the blood lymphocyte samples. All the genes were methylated in more than half of the cell lines (Figure 2). The methylation beta value from the Illumina methylation arrays was compared with the peak heights of the sequencing electropherograms from bisulfite sequencing of the genes where the CpG site analyzed by the methylation array was inside of the PCR fragment analyzed by BSP (TGFBI, PRKCDBP, DUSP23 and COL1A2). There were good correlations between the methods.

Figure 2
figure 2

Bisulfite sequencing analysis. (A) Summary of bisulfite sequencing analysis of methylation status in cell lines and control tissues of the selected genes. (B) Methylation-specific PCR analysis of DHRS3. M, methylation-specific reaction; U, non-methylation-specific reaction. Samples from left to right: SK-N-AS, SK-N-BE(2), SK-N-DZ, SK-N-FI, Kelly, NB69, IMR-32, SK-N-SH, SH-SY-5Y, adrenal, blood lymphocytes (3 samples), unmethylated control, methylated control and negative PCR control. Most of the NB cell lines are partially methylated, as they show both methylated and unmethylated products. NB69 is although completely methylated, and SK-N-DZ and SK-N-SH unmethylated (although weak methylated bands can be detected by careful inspection, which could reflect a low level of methylation in these samples). (C) Examples of bisulfite sequencing of SCNN1A and KRT19. Cytosines/tymines in the CpG dinucleotide are underlined. C in the sequence indicates methylated CpG sites and T unmethylated. SCNN1A, top sequence IMR-32, bottom adrenal; KRT19, top sequence SH-SY-5Y and bottom, blood lymphocytes.

Full size image

Differential methylation analysis

In order to see whether the methylation also varied among biologically different subgroups of NB, we compared the methylation beta values from the Illumina arrays with different patient variables. We compared patients who are alive with no evidence of disease (NED) five years after diagnosis (5-year overall survival; OS) with those who were dead of disease (DOD), known prognostic chromosomal aberrations such as 1p deletion, MYCN amplification, 11q deletion and 17q gain, age at diagnosis, as well as chromosomal profiles obtained from array copy number data analysis [2]. Differential methylation based on 5-year OS was seen for the genes SCNN1A, PRKCDBP and KRT19 with a higher methylation frequency found in tumors from patients with an unfavorable outcome, see Figure 3A and Table 2. For SCNN1A, PRKCDBP, KRT19, TGFBI and DUSP23, significantly higher methylation frequencies found in MYCN-amplified tumors, see Figure 3B and Table 3.

Figure 3
figure 3

Differential methylation analysis. (A) Analysis of differences in methylation beta values from patients with no evidence of disease (NED) compared to those with an adverse outcome (DOD) for the most statistically significant genes. One of the CpG sites from the Illumina methylation array is shown. Box plot explanation; upper and lower hinges of the box represent the 75th percentile and 25th percentile respectively; whiskers indicate the highest and lowest values that are not outliers or extreme values; thick horizontal line within box, median. Open circles represent outliers and asterisks represent extremes. The p-value at gene-by-gene level is indicated in the left lower corner in each graph. (B) Analysis of methylation frequencies for tumors with different chromosomal profiles. For definition of chromosomal groups, see Carén et al [44]. CpG sites for SCNN1A and DUSP23 are shown. The highest methylation frequencies in SCNN1A are found in NB tumors with an unfavorable chromosomal profile. Methylation of DUSP23 is almost mutually exclusive in MYCN-amplified NBs.

Full size image
Table 2 Methylation Δbeta values (methylation frequencies) between the outcome groups DOD and NED.
Full size table
Table 3 Methylation Δbeta values (methylation frequencies) between various tumor characteristics.
Full size table

The odds ratio (OR) for 5-year OS was calculated using MYCN amplification, 1p deletion, 11q deletion, 17q gain or gene methylation as prognostic factors. The OR was 5.7 for MYCN amplification (95% CI 1.7-19.1), 4.4 for 1p deletion (95% CI 1.4-13.6), 3.4 for 11q deletion (95% CI 1.1-11.1) and 10.8 for 17q gain (95% CI 3.0-38.7). For gene methylation, the ORs are given for one (1) standard deviation increase in beta units of methylation. The OR for SCNN1A was 3.4 (95% CI 1.5-7.3), for PRKCDBP 2.5 (95% CI 1.3-4.8) and for KRT19 2.5 (95% CI 1.2-5.0). As a prognostic tool, known factors such as MYCN amplification predict the outcome of 70% of cases in our material correctly, 1p deletion 69%, 11q deletion 66% and 17q gain 74%. Using the estimated logistic regression model and a cut-off at 50% risk, the methylation beta value of SCNN1A predicts 77%, PRKCDBP 76% and KRT19 64% of cases correctly.

Expression analysis with real-time RT-PCR

Real-time RT-PCR data of the eight genes was generated from primary tumors, NB cell lines and control tissues using custom-designed TLDA cards (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). All the genes were expressed in all control tissues. SCNN1A expression was absent in 44% of the NB tumors analyzed, the other genes were expressed in all tumors. The mRNA expression of the genes KRT19, PRKCDBP and DUSP23 was significant lower in patients that have died from disease compared with patients with no evidence of disease (fold change -8.3, p = 0.011, -2.4, p = 0.036 and -2.8, p = 0.017, respectively; see additional file 7).

Discussion

In this study, we treated four NB cell lines with 5-Aza-dC and/or TSA and analyzed the RNA with expression microarrays. Data from Illumina genome-wide methylation arrays (Carén et al, in manuscript) of 59 primary NB tumors were also used to identify genes that were activated by treatment as well as being methylated. Eight genes were selected as candidate genes for epigenetic silencing and the data from the 5-Aza-dC and/or TSA expression microarray were validated for these genes with real-time RT-PCR in the same set of cell lines, as well as in five additional NB cell lines. The results from the microarray and the real-time RT-PCR analysis was generally in accordance and most of the additional five cell lines showed the same pattern of gene activation after 5-Aza-dC and/or TSA treatment (see additional file 6). Bisulfite sequencing was performed to validate the methylation status in the respective promoter CpG islands; all the eight genes were indeed methylated in the region surrounding the transcription start sites. Differential methylation beta values from the Illumina methylation arrays were analyzed to explore if the beta values of the eight genes could be used to distinguish different subsets of NB. See table 2 for various tumor characteristics that could be distinguished using methylation beta values of different genes. A high beta value was generally associated with unfavorable characteristics. For example, the beta values of SCNN1A, PRKCDBP and KRT19 could distinguish between patients with a 5-year OS from those that have died of the disease. The beta values of these three genes as well as for TGFBI and DUSP23 were also correlated with MYCN amplification. TGFBI expression has previously been shown to be inversely correlated to MYCN amplification [14]. Our data suggest that DNA methylation could be a factor that is responsible for this. Real-time RT-PCR analysis of the eight genes was also performed. Gene expression could be detected in most of the NB tumors and in all control tissues (SCNN1A was only expressed in 56% of NB tumors). The mRNA expression of KRT19, PRKCDBP and DUSP23 was significantly lower in tumors from patients that have died from the disease compared with patients with no evidence of disease (additional file 7). The beta value of the gene KRT19 (CpG site cg11462865) was correlated (by Spearman correlation; correlation -0.54, p = 0.002) with the mRNA expression in paired samples. Also for DHRS3 a correlation was detected (cg01346152, correlation -0.42, p = 0.02). The other genes did not show this paired sample correlation, indicating that the analyzed CpG sites in these genes are located in regions that are not important for gene regulation. There are also technical explanations for this. For example, since the DNA and RNA have been extracted using different samples of the same tumor the heterogeneity of the tumor could explain that correlations are not seen since it is not the identical sample that is analyzed. The fact that correlations in DNA methylation and mRNA expression are not seen for all the genes may also reflect the difficulties involved in analyzing RNA; RNA is much more unstable and degrades far more easily than DNA. In contrast, the methylation of DNA is a robust, stable procedure and much easier to measure. This could also explain why DNA methylation is far more closely correlated to various tumor characteristics than gene expression (see Table 2 and additional file 7).

The three identified genes with differential methylation (SCNN1A, PRKCDBP and KRT19) have all previously been reported as methylated in different forms of tumors. SCNN1A is an ion transport gene that has been reported to be one of six genes that contribute to a hypermethylator phenotype that is seen in a subset of breast cancer cell lines and primary tumors [22]. Hypermethylation of the putative tumor suppressor gene PRKCDBP (also known as hSRBC) has been reported in several different tumors (Table 1). Stable expression of PRKCDBP has been shown to induce cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase as well as apoptosis, and suppress cellular growth in vitro and in xenograft tumors by enhancing the protein stability of p53 and the expression of p53 target genes [20]. KRT19 (CK19) encodes an element of the cytoskeleton and shows frequent DNA methylation in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines and primary RCC, without methylation in normal renal tissue [38]. KRT19 mRNA has also been reported to be downregulated in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck and the over-expression of the gene was shown to decrease SCC invasiveness by diminishing migratory capability [39].

Conclusions

Based on our data, SCNN1A, PRKCDBP and KRT19 are the best candidates for further analysis in NB. The methylation frequencies of all of these genes can separate tumors from patients with no evidence of disease from those that have died from disease. The mRNA expression of KRT19 and PRKCDBP is also significantly different in tumors from these two groups of patients. It would therefore be very interesting to explore the functions of these genes in relation to NB development/progression and their use as potential biomarkers for prognostic use.

The number of tumors analyzed in this study was fairly small (n = 59) and the findings that the methylation pattern of the genes mentioned here is associated with different biological subgroups of NB need to be verified in a larger number of tumors. Nevertheless, as a prognostic tool, the methylation of most of the genes presented here is just as good or better as the known prognostic risk factors, such as 1p deletion, MYCN amplification, 11q deletion and 17q gain, when it comes to predicting accurate outcome in this set of tumors. In addition, this study uses a technique that has not previously been used for this tumor and it highlights genes with interesting functions that have not previously been reported as methylated in NB. Stable biomarkers as DNA methylation are likely to be important in the risk stratification of patients with NB in the future. It is essential to make the best possible prognosis in order to cure as many patients as possible, as well as to avoid unnecessary treatment which can lead to severe side-effects in this group of young patients.

Methods

Cell lines and tumor material

Expression analysis

The four NB cell lines SK-N-AS, SK-N-BE(2), SK-N-DZ and IMR-32 were used for cDNA microarray analysis. For conformation studies with real-time RT-PCR, these four and another five NB cell lines (SK-N-SH, SK-N-FI, SH-SY-5Y, Kelly and NB69) were used, as well as 43 NB tumors and nine healthy control tissues (fetal brain, fetal heart, fetal kidney, fetal spleen, fetal thymus, adrenal, colon, leukocytes and mammary gland; all from Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA). Ethical permission was granted by the local ethics committee (Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, registration number 03-736 and 2009/1369).

Methylation analysis

Fifty-nine NB tumors were analyzed with the Illumina Human Methylation27 DNA analysis bead chips, together with one adrenal sample, methylated and unmethylated controls and four NB cell lines, SK-N-AS, SK-N-BE(2), SK-N-DZ and IMR-32 (additional file 8). Thirty-two of the tumors used for expression analysis were included in the methylation analysis. For bisulfite sequencing, nine NB cell lines were used, together with control DNA from healthy blood donors and one adrenal sample. Thirty of the tumors analyzed with the methylation arrays were also used to verify the methylation status of some of the selected genes. In addition, a methylated control sample and an unmethylated control (EpiTect control DNA, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), as well as a 50/50 mixture of them, were used in the amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA, in order to control for the unwanted selective amplification of methylated or unmethylated templates during PCR amplification.

Drug treatments

Cells were treated with the demethylating agent 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (Sigma-Aldrich CO, St Louis, MO) or the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA; Sigma-Aldrich) or with a combinatorial treatment with both agents as previously described [9]. A concentration of 2 μM of 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-dC) for 72 hours and 0.5 μM of TSA for 16 hours was used.

RNA extraction

Total RNA was extracted from cell lines and primary tumors using the Totally RNA kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) and was treated with DNA-free (Ambion), according to the protocols of the supplier. RNA quality was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA) and by measuring absorbance with the Nanodrop ND-1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE).

Expression microarray analysis

RNA was analyzed with the Human-6 v2 Expression BeadChip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) at AROS Applied Biotechnology AS (Aros AB, Aarhus, Denmark), according to the protocol provided by the supplier. For the generation of biotin-labeled cRNA, the Illumina TotalPrep RNA amplification kit (Ambion) was used. In short, 300 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed and the first-strand cDNA was used to make the second strand. The purified second-strand cDNA, along with biotin UTPs, was then transcribed in vitro into biotinylated cRNA. Purified, labeled cRNA, 1.5 μg, was hybridized to Sentrix Human-6 v2 expression Illumina Beadchips for 16 h at 58°C, before being washed and stained with streptavidin-Cy3. The bead chips were then dried and scanned on the Illumina BeadArray Reader confocal scanner. Expression data generated by BeadStudio were exported and analyzed using IlluminaGUI [40].

Analysis of DNA methylation

Illumina Human Methylation27 DNA analysis bead chips were used to determine the methylation levels of 27,578 CpG sites. After bisulfite treatment of the DNA samples, the cytosines in the CpG sites were genotyped as C/T polymorphisms according to the manufacturer's protocol. The fluorescence signals were measured from the BeadArrays using an Illumina BeadStation GX scanner. The fluorescence data were then analyzed using the BeadStudio software (Illumina). The software assigns a score called a "beta value" to each CpG site, which corresponds to the ratio between the fluorescence signal from the methylated allele (C) and the sum of the fluorescent signals of the methylated (C) and unmethylated (T) alleles [41]. The array processing was performed by the SNP Technology Platform in Uppsala (URL: http://www.genotyping.se).

cDNA preparation and real-time RT-PCR

cDNA preparation was performed as previously described [9]. Custom-designed TLDA cards containing 15 individual assays were ordered from Applied Biosystems. 200 ng of RNA converted into cDNA in a total volume of 100 μl were loaded to each card according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Each cDNA sample was analyzed in triplicate. TLDA cards were run and analyzed by the ABI PRISM® 7900HT Sequence Detection System (SDS 2.2, Applied Biosystems) according to manufacturer's protocol (Applied Biosystems). Calculations were performed using the ΔCt relative quantification method. The thresholds and baselines were set manually in SDS and Ct values were extracted. All Ct values were normalized to the housekeeping gene GUSB for each sample [9]. Samples with no expression were set to a Ct value of 40. To evaluate the agreement between the mRNA expression levels and the DNA methylation levels, a Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated for each gene. The delta Ct values between groups were compared using Student's two-sided t-test. Fold change between groups was calculated from the 2^-delta Ct values.

DNA methylation analysis with bisulfite sequencing

CpG islands at the 5' promoter region that included the transcriptional start sites were identified using CpG island searcher (URL: http://cpgislands.usc.edu) [42]. These regions, or parts of them, were amplified with regular PCR or semi-nested/nested primers if needed. Primers were designed with BiSearch [43]. Primer sequences are available on request.

Methylation analysis was performed with tag-modified bisulfite genomic sequencing [44]. Genomic DNA, 1 μg, was modified with the EpiTect kit (Qiagen), according to the protocol of the supplier. The modified DNA was amplified using touchdown PCR with 1x Reaction Buffer, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 2.0-3.0 mM MgCl2, 0.4 μM of forward and reverse primers respectively and 1 unit of HotStar Taq (Qiagen), in a total volume of 20 μl, with or without the addition of Q-solution (Qiagen). Reactions were denatured at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 20 cycles of 95°C for 45 sec, 10°C above annealing temperature with a decrease of half a degree per cycle for 45 sec, 68°C for 60 sec and 15-20 cycles of 95°C for 45 sec, annealing temperature for 45 sec, 68°C for 60 sec and ending with a seven-minute extension at 68°C. The specificity of products was inspected by agarose gel electrophoresis before they were purified using Agencourt AMPure magnetic beads (Agencourt Bioscience Corporation, Beverly, MA) using the Biomek NX pipetting robot (Beckman Coulter) and eluted in distilled H2O. Sequence PCR was performed using forward or reverse primer with the ABI Prism BigDye™ cycle sequencing Ready Reaction Kit v1.1 (Applied Biosystems). Sequence PCR was run in 10 μl reactions under the following conditions: 96°C for one minute, followed by 25 cycles of 96°C for 10 sec and 50°C for four minutes. Sequencing products were purified using CleanSeq magnetic beads (Agencourt) using the Biomek NX and re-suspended in 10 μl of High Dye formamide (Applied Biosystems). The sequencing products were separated using gel electrophoresis on a 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and the output data were viewed and analyzed using Sequence Analysis v5.2 (Applied Biosystems) and BiQ Analyzer [45]. One methylated control sample, one unmethylated control and one 50/50 mixture of methylated and unmethylated controls were included in each PCR to ensure that methylated and unmethylated templates were both equally amplified.

Methylation-specific PCR (MSP)

MSP was used to analyze the promoter region of DHRS3. Primer sequences were taken from Furuta et al [17]. The EpiTect MSP kit (Qiagen) was used to amplify methylated and unmethylated templates in separate reactions. The PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel with GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, CA) and visualized with UV light. Methylated and unmethylated controls were used to check the specificity of the assay.

Data analysis

The methylation frequencies of the genes grouped into patients with a 5-year overall survival (OS) versus patients dead of disease, INRG stage, as well as other prognostic factors were compared with Student's two-sided t-test. Considered as prognostic factors; five-year OS, MYCN amplification, 1p deletion, 11q deletion, 17q gain, INRG stage, age at diagnosis (cut-off at 18 months) and gene methylation, were analyzed by logistic regression, both as single predictors and in multipredictor models with one gene and one other predictor (Table 4). Kaplan-Meier diagrams were used to illustrate the survival of patients below and above median methylation (Figure 4).

Table 4 Odds ratio for gene methylation, with and without adjustment for other prognostic factors.
Full size table
Figure 4
figure 4

Survival analysis. Methylation frequencies of the genes SCNN1A, KRT19 and PRKCDBP analyzed with Kaplan-Meier diagram. Patients are separated by having a methylation frequency above (green line) and below the median (blue line) methylation beta value.

Full size image

References

  1. Maris JM, Matthay KK: Molecular biology of neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17: 2264-2279.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carén H, Erichsen J, Olsson L, Enerbäck C, Sjöberg RM, Abrahamsson J, Kogner P, Martinsson T: High-resolution array copy number analyses for detection of deletion, gain, amplification and copy-neutral LOH in primary neuroblastoma tumors: Four cases of homozygous deletions of the CDKN2A gene. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 353-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Martinsson T, Sjöberg RM, Hedborg F, Kogner P: Homozygous deletion of the neurofibromatosis-1 gene in the tumor of a patient with neuroblastoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997, 95: 183-189. 10.1016/S0165-4608(96)00259-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Munoz J, Lazcoz P, Inda MM, Nistal M, Pestana A, Encio IJ, Castresana JS: Homozygous deletion and expression of PTEN and DMBT1 in human primary neuroblastoma and cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2004, 109: 673-679. 10.1002/ijc.20055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Origone P, Defferrari R, Mazzocco K, Lo Cunsolo C, De Bernardi B, Tonini GP: Homozygous inactivation of NF1 gene in a patient with familial NF1 and disseminated neuroblastoma. Am J Med Genet A. 2003, 118: 309-313. 10.1002/ajmg.a.10167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson PM, Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Seeger RC, Reynolds CP, Brodeur GM, White PS: Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A (p16INK4a/p14ARF) but not within 1p36 or at other tumor suppressor loci in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 679-686.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Astuti D, Agathanggelou A, Honorio S, Dallol A, Martinsson T, Kogner P, Cummins C, Neumann HP, Voutilainen R, Dahia P, et al: RASSF1A promoter region CpG island hypermethylation in phaeochromocytomas and neuroblastoma tumours. Oncogene. 2001, 20: 7573-7577. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carén H, Ejeskär K, Fransson S, Hesson L, Latif F, Sjöberg RM, Krona C, Martinsson T: A cluster of genes located in 1p36 are down-regulated in neuroblastomas with poor prognosis, but not due to CpG island methylation. Mol Cancer. 2005, 4: 10-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Carén H, Fransson S, Ejeskär K, Kogner P, Martinsson T: Genetic and epigenetic changes in the common 1p36 deletion in neuroblastoma tumours. Br J Cancer. 2007, 97: 1416-1424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Agathanggelou A, Dallol A, Zochbauer-Muller S, Morrissey C, Honorio S, Hesson L, Martinsson T, Fong KM, Kuo MJ, Yuen PW, et al: Epigenetic inactivation of the candidate 3p21.3 suppressor gene BLU in human cancers. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 1580-1588. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Banelli B, Gelvi I, Di Vinci A, Scaruffi P, Casciano I, Allemanni G, Bonassi S, Tonini GP, Romani M: Distinct CpG methylation profiles characterize different clinical groups of neuroblastic tumors. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 5619-5628. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208722.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez-Gomez P, Bello MJ, Lomas J, Arjona D, Alonso ME, Aminoso C, Lopez-Marin I, Anselmo NP, Sarasa JL, Gutierrez M, et al: Aberrant methylation of multiple genes in neuroblastic tumours. relationship with MYCN amplification and allelic status at 1p. Eur J Cancer. 2003, 39: 1478-1485. 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00312-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderton JA, Lindsey JC, Lusher ME, Gilbertson RJ, Bailey S, Ellison DW, Clifford SC: Global analysis of the medulloblastoma epigenome identifies disease-subgroup-specific inactivation of COL1A2. Neuro Oncol. 2008, 10: 981-994. 10.1215/15228517-2008-048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Becker J, Erdlenbruch B, Noskova I, Schramm A, Aumailley M, Schorderet DF, Schweigerer L: Keratoepithelin suppresses the progression of experimental human neuroblastomas. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 5314-5321. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Becker J, Volland S, Noskova I, Schramm A, Schweigerer LL, Wilting J: Keratoepithelin reverts the suppression of tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 by MYCN in human neuroblastoma: a mechanism to inhibit invasion. Int J Oncol. 2008, 32: 235-240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cerignoli F, Guo X, Cardinali B, Rinaldi C, Casaletto J, Frati L, Screpanti I, Gudas LJ, Gulino A, Thiele CJ, Giannini G: retSDR1, a short-chain retinol dehydrogenase/reductase, is retinoic acid-inducible and frequently deleted in human neuroblastoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 1196-1204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Furuta J, Nobeyama Y, Umebayashi Y, Otsuka F, Kikuchi K, Ushijima T: Silencing of Peroxiredoxin 2 and aberrant methylation of 33 CpG islands in putative promoter regions in human malignant melanomas. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 6080-6086. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haeseleer F, Huang J, Lebioda L, Saari JC, Palczewski K: Molecular characterization of a novel short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase that reduces all-trans-retinal. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 21790-21799. 10.1074/jbc.273.34.21790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kamei N, Hiyama K, Yamaoka H, Kamimatsuse A, Onitake Y, Sueda T, Hiyama E: Evaluation of genes identified by microarray analysis in favorable neuroblastoma. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009, 25: 931-937. 10.1007/s00383-009-2448-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JH, Byun DS, Lee MG, Ryu BK, Kang MJ, Chae KS, Lee KY, Kim HJ, Park H, Chi SG: Frequent epigenetic inactivation of hSRBC in gastric cancer and its implication in attenuated p53 response to stresses. Int J Cancer. 2008, 122: 1573-1584. 10.1002/ijc.23166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mori K, Enokida H, Kagara I, Kawakami K, Chiyomaru T, Tatarano S, Kawahara K, Nishiyama K, Seki N, Nakagawa M: CpG hypermethylation of collagen type I alpha 2 contributes to proliferation and migration activity of human bladder cancer. Int J Oncol. 2009, 34: 1593-1602. 10.3892/ijo_00000233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roll JD, Rivenbark AG, Jones WD, Coleman WB: DNMT3b overexpression contributes to a hypermethylator phenotype in human breast cancer cell lines. Mol Cancer. 2008, 7: 15-10.1186/1476-4598-7-15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sengupta PK, Smith EM, Kim K, Murnane MJ, Smith BD: DNA hypermethylation near the transcription start site of collagen alpha2(I) gene occurs in both cancer cell lines and primary colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 1789-1797.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shao G, Berenguer J, Borczuk AC, Powell CA, Hei TK, Zhao Y: Epigenetic inactivation of Betaig-h3 gene in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 4566-4573. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tonks NK, Neel BG: Combinatorial control of the specificity of protein tyrosine phosphatases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001, 13: 182-195. 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00196-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu Q, Li Y, Gu S, Li N, Zheng D, Li D, Zheng Z, Ji C, Xie Y, Mao Y: Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel dual-specificity phosphatase 23 gene from human fetal brain. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004, 36: 1542-1553. 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.12.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dahlman T, Lammerts E, Bergstrom D, Franzen A, Westermark K, Heldin NE, Rubin K: Collagen type I expression in experimental anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: regulation and relevance for tumorigenicity. Int J Cancer. 2002, 98: 186-192. 10.1002/ijc.10181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hendrix MJ, Seftor EA, Chu YW, Trevor KT, Seftor RE: Role of intermediate filaments in migration, invasion and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1996, 15: 507-525. 10.1007/BF00054016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koga Y, Pelizzola M, Cheng E, Krauthammer M, Sznol M, Ariyan S, Narayan D, Molinaro AM, Halaban R, Weissman SM: Genome-wide screen of promoter methylation identifies novel markers in melanoma. Genome Res. 2009, 19: 1462-1470. 10.1101/gr.091447.109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Margetts CD, Morris M, Astuti D, Gentle DC, Cascon A, McRonald FE, Catchpoole D, Robledo M, Neumann HP, Latif F, Maher ER: Evaluation of a functional epigenetic approach to identify promoter region methylation in phaeochromocytoma and neuroblastoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008, 15: 777-786. 10.1677/ERC-08-0072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Martinez R, Martin-Subero JI, Rohde V, Kirsch M, Alaminos M, Fernandez AF, Ropero S, Schackert G, Esteller M: A microarray-based DNA methylation study of glioblastoma multiforme. Epigenetics. 2009, 4: 255-264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schramm A, Schulte JH, Klein-Hitpass L, Havers W, Sieverts H, Berwanger B, Christiansen H, Warnat P, Brors B, Eils J, et al: Prediction of clinical outcome and biological characterization of neuroblastoma by expression profiling. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 7902-7912. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208936.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stathopoulos EN, Sanidas E, Kafousi M, Mavroudis D, Askoxylakis J, Bozionelou V, Perraki M, Tsiftsis D, Georgoulias V: Detection of CK-19 mRNA-positive cells in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients with histologically and immunohistochemically negative axillary lymph nodes. Ann Oncol. 2005, 16: 240-246. 10.1093/annonc/mdi043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Theodorou E, Dalembert G, Heffelfinger C, White E, Weissman S, Corcoran L, Snyder M: A high throughput embryonic stem cell screen identifies Oct-2 as a bifunctional regulator of neuronal differentiation. Genes Dev. 2009, 23: 575-588. 10.1101/gad.1772509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tong SY, Ki KD, Lee JM, Kang MJ, Ha TK, Chung SI, Chi SG, Lee SK: Frequent inactivation of hSRBC in ovarian cancers by promoter CpG island hypermethylation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010, 89: 629-635. 10.3109/00016341003678443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu XL, Wu LC, Du F, Davis A, Peyton M, Tomizawa Y, Maitra A, Tomlinson G, Gazdar AF, Weissman BE, et al: Inactivation of human SRBC, located within the 11p15.5-p15.4 tumor suppressor region, in breast and lung cancers. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 7943-7949.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zochbauer-Muller S, Fong KM, Geradts J, Xu X, Seidl S, End-Pfutzenreuter A, Lang G, Heller G, Zielinski CC, Gazdar AF, Minna JD: Expression of the candidate tumor suppressor gene hSRBC is frequently lost in primary lung cancers with and without DNA methylation. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 6249-6255. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Morris MR, Gentle D, Abdulrahman M, Clarke N, Brown M, Kishida T, Yao M, Teh BT, Latif F, Maher ER: Functional epigenomics approach to identify methylated candidate tumour suppressor genes in renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 496-501. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Crowe DL, Milo GE, Shuler CF: Keratin 19 downregulation by oral squamous cell carcinoma lines increases invasive potential. J Dent Res. 1999, 78: 1256-1263. 10.1177/00220345990780061001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schultze JL, Eggle D: IlluminaGUI: graphical user interface for analyzing gene expression data generated on the Illumina platform. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: 1431-1433. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bibikova M, Lin Z, Zhou L, Chudin E, Garcia EW, Wu B, Doucet D, Thomas NJ, Wang Y, Vollmer E, et al: High-throughput DNA methylation profiling using universal bead arrays. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 383-393. 10.1101/gr.4410706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Takai D, Jones PA: Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 3740-3745. 10.1073/pnas.052410099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tusnady GE, Simon I, Varadi A, Aranyi T: BiSearch: primer-design and search tool for PCR on bisulfite-treated genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: e9-10.1093/nar/gni012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Han W, Cauchi S, Herman JG, Spivack SD: DNA methylation mapping by tag-modified bisulfite genomic sequencing. Anal Biochem. 2006, 355: 50-61. 10.1016/j.ab.2006.05.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bock C, Reither S, Mikeska T, Paulsen M, Walter J, Lengauer T: BiQ Analyzer: visualization and quality control for DNA methylation data from bisulfite sequencing. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 4067-4068. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society, the Children's Cancer Foundation, the Nilsson-Ehle Foundation, the Assar Gabrielsson Foundation, the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Research Foundation and the Sahlgrenska University Hospital Foundation. HC was the recipient of a fellowship from the Swedish Knowledge Foundation through the Industrial PhD programme in Medical Bioinformatics at the Strategy and Development Office (SDO) at Karolinska Institutet. We are grateful for help and access to instrumentation provided by the Sahlgrenska Academy Genomics Core Facility. The SNP Technology Platform in Uppsala, Sweden, is supported financially by Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Genetics, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Helena Carén, Anna Djos, Rose-Marie Sjöberg & Tommy Martinsson

  2. Genomics Core Facility, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Maria Nethander

  3. Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden

    Per Kogner

  4. Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden

    Camilla Enström

  5. Department of Mathematical Statistics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Staffan Nilsson

Authors
  1. Helena Carén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Djos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Nethander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rose-Marie Sjöberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Per Kogner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Camilla Enström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Staffan Nilsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tommy Martinsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Carén.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HC initiated the project, performed experimental analyses, data analyses, statistical analyses, drafted the manuscript and coordinated the study. AD performed bisulfite sequencing and TLDA. MN and SN performed statistical analysis. RMS aided in cell treatment experiments. CE processed the Illumina methylation arrays at the core facility. PK provided clinical information. TM co-coordinated the study and co-drafted the manuscript. All the authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

12885_2010_2560_MOESM1_ESM.PPT

Additional file 1: Venn diagrams of genes identified in the cell treatment study. (A) Distribution of the top 100 probes (largest fold change between untreated and treated cell lines), detected as up-regulated in the study. Note that there are not always 100 probes in each group, as there are cases in which more than one probe per gene is identified in the top list. (B) Total number of genes up-regulated by treatment and (C) down-regulated. (PPT 733 KB)

Additional file 2: Number of genes affected by treatments in at least one cell line. (XLS 38 KB)

Additional file 3: List of genes upregulated by treatment in the respective cell lines. (XLS 18 KB)

12885_2010_2560_MOESM4_ESM.XLS

Additional file 4: Number of genes affected by treatment in the cell lines and number of genes with a beta value of more than 0.75 in the respective cell lines. (XLS 212 KB)

Additional file 5: The selected genes analyzed in this study. (XLS 30 KB)

12885_2010_2560_MOESM6_ESM.XLS

Additional file 6: Fold change in gene expression after treatment with 5-Aza-dC and/or TSA in the real-time RT-PCR and microarray experiment. (XLS 34 KB)

Additional file 7: Fold change in gene expression between various tumor characteristics. (XLS 26 KB)

Additional file 8: Patient data. (XLS 32 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carén, H., Djos, A., Nethander, M. et al. Identification of epigenetically regulated genes that predict patient outcome in neuroblastoma. BMC Cancer 11, 66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-66

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-66

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us