Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

A Kallikrein 15 (KLK15) single nucleotide polymorphism located close to a novel exon shows evidence of association with poor ovarian cancer survival

BMC Cancer volume 11, Article number: 119 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

KLK15 over-expression is reported to be a significant predictor of reduced progression-free survival and overall survival in ovarian cancer. Our aim was to analyse the KLK15 gene for putative functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and assess the association of these and KLK15 HapMap tag SNPs with ovarian cancer survival.

Results

In silico analysis was performed to identify KLK15 regulatory elements and to classify potentially functional SNPs in these regions. After SNP validation and identification by DNA sequencing of ovarian cancer cell lines and aggressive ovarian cancer patients, 9 SNPs were shortlisted and genotyped using the Sequenom iPLEX Mass Array platform in a cohort of Australian ovarian cancer patients (N = 319). In the Australian dataset we observed significantly worse survival for the KLK15 rs266851 SNP in a dominant model (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.96). This association was observed in the same direction in two independent datasets, with a combined HR for the three studies of 1.16 (1.00-1.34). This SNP lies 15bp downstream of a novel exon and is predicted to be involved in mRNA splicing. The mutant allele is also predicted to abrogate an HSF-2 binding site.

Conclusions

We provide evidence of association for the SNP rs266851 with ovarian cancer survival. Our results provide the impetus for downstream functional assays and additional independent validation studies to assess the role of KLK15 regulatory SNPs and KLK15 isoforms with alternative intracellular functional roles in ovarian cancer survival.

Peer Review reports

Background

Ovarian cancer is an aggressive disease with high metastatic potential and is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage [1, 2]. In vitro studies show that malignant cells synthesize and secrete proteolytic enzymes which disrupt basement and extracellular membranes to allow malignant cells to invade neighboring tissues and metastasize [3]. Members of the Kallikrein-related (KLK) peptidase family are part of a proteolytic enzymatic cascade activated in aggressive forms of hormone-related cancers including ovarian cancer [4–6]. The KLKs are encoded by a 15-member gene family clustered together in a region of approximately 320 kb on chromosome 19q13.4 [5–7]. KLK15 (encoding for KLK15, previously reported as hK15, or prostinogen) is the most recently cloned member of the human kallikrein gene family [8], sharing a high degree of structural similarity with KLK3 (PSA), and is positioned adjacent to the KLK3 gene [5, 8]. KLK15 mRNA expression levels are up-regulated in prostate cancer [9–11] and ovarian cancer [12]. In addition, KLK15 mRNA expression is reported to be a favorable diagnostic marker for breast cancer [13], and a significant predictor of reduced progression-free survival and overall survival after ovarian cancer diagnosis [12]. Several studies have been undertaken investigating the role of KLK genetic variants in different cancers, aiming to better understand cancer biology and also to identify potential new targets for genetic testing with regard to cancer risk and prognosis [14–17]. Of note, we have recently identified a PSA promoter SNP to be associated with ovarian cancer survival (O'Mara, manuscript submitted), however, no studies have been undertaken to assess the role of KLK15 genetic variation in ovarian cancer prognosis.

We used in silico approaches for data mining of the KLK15 gene for potential functional motifs and differential splicing to determine regions of the gene that could be functionally compromised by genetic variations. This was supplemented by identification of potentially functional common SNPs using database searches and re-sequencing of ovarian cancer cell lines and patients, to prioritize variants for ovarian cancer prognosis studies. We then assessed the association between ovarian cancer survival and 9 SNPs tagging 22 prioritized KLK15 SNPs in an Australian dataset, and undertook replication studies in two other ovarian cancer studies to validate our findings.

Methods

Study Participants and Genotyping

The initial phase of this study included 319 Australian women diagnosed with primary invasive epithelial ovarian cancer between 1985 and 1997. Over half of the women (N = 207, 65%) had participated in a large population-based case-control study of the etiology of ovarian cancer. Briefly, these women were ascertained through major gynecology-oncology treatment centres in the three most populous Australian states: Queensland, New SouthWales and Victoria. A central gynecologic histopathologist reviewed all pathology reports and sections of each tumor to confirm the diagnosis and histological subtype. The remaining women (N = 112, 35%) were ascertained as consecutive incident cases from the Royal Brisbane Hospital (RBH), Queensland, Australia. The patients in the study were included on the basis on availability of DNA and survival/follow up data. Information on diagnosis, disease stage (using the International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians [FIGO] criteria), tumor histology and grade was abstracted retrospectively from the women's medical records and pathology reports or, for a subset of cases, from the RBH Gynecology Oncology database. Full details of the methods and the characteristics of the cases have been reported previously [15, 18]. The women were followed for mortality using personal identifiers which were linked to the Australian National Death Index (NDI), State Cancer Registry records and the RBH Gynecology Oncology database. DNA was extracted as described in previous studies [15, 18] and genotyping of the KLK15 SNPs was performed using the Sequenom iPLEX MassArray platform (San Diego, CA, USA) according to manufacturer instructions. The first replication sample set included 1815 patients from the stage 1 of an ovarian cancer genome-wide association study (GWAS), all with confirmed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from four different ovarian cancer case series in the United Kingdom (UK): United Kingdom Ovarian Population study (UKOPS), Study of Epidemiology and Risk Factors in Cancer Heredity (SEARCH), Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) and United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry (UKFOCR), as described previously [19]. Genotyping of the replication sample set was performed as part of the first published genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ovarian cancer [19].

The second replication dataset consisted of 413 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Pilot Project established by the National Cancer Institute and the National Human Genome Research Institute. Information about TCGA and the investigators and institutions that constitute the TCGA research network can be found at their website [20]. Genotyping and clinical data for ovarian cancer patients were downloaded via the TCGA data portal.

Progression-free survival, residual disease status and platinum sensitivity data were not available for the Australian or European sample sets. Informed consent was obtained from all the participating subjects. Human Ethics Committee approval was given for the recruitment and genotyping of all the individuals included in this study.

Web based search for putative splice-variants

Access information for the KLK15 gene and its protein product was downloaded from different databases as given in Additional file 1. Potential KLK15 alternative splice variants were identified through sequence alignment analysis of the splice variants and Expression Sequence Tags (ESTs) reported in publicly available databases including NCBI and Ensembl. Sequence alignments were performed using the clustal W platform. SignalP 3.0 Server and PSORT II Prediction default matrices were used to determine if each KLK15 isoform contained a signal peptide. mRNA folding of all the KLK15 variants was analysed by in silico modeling using mfold version 2.3. Additional file 2 details the websites used for the in silico analysis.

In silicoPromoter and SNP analysis

The 11 kb region upstream of exon 1 on chromosome 19 (56020307 to 56037591 bp, NCBI build 36.3) along with the KLK15 coding sequence (Ensemble ID; ENSGG000000174562) was selected for putative promoter and SNP analysis using websites in Additional file 2. In brief, WWW Promoter Scan, PromoterInspector, CpG Islands, and Cister were used to predict and analyse putative promoter regions. Since hormonal steroids are known to be key regulators of KLK expression in hormone dependent cancers [21, 22], we assessed the promoter regions for putative estrogen and androgen regulatory elements. Dragon ERE finder (sensitivity of 0.83) and Cister (ERE matrix) were used to find putative estrogen response elements (EREs). Cister (ARE matrix) and JASPAR (threshold 75%) were used to identify putative androgen response elements (AREs). SIFT and Polyphen were used to predict the functional significance of non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPS). Webserver FastSNP was used for predicting the functional significance of the UTR and splice site SNPs. Analysis for putative microRNA (miRNA) sites was performed using miRBase Targets V4, Target scan, miRanda, PicTar and Patrocles.

Cell culture, RT PCR and sequencing of KLK15putative promoter region

The normal ovarian cell line HOSE17.1 and serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma cell lines OVCA432, SKOV3, PEO1 were cultured as previously described [15]. RNA extraction and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) were performed as previously published [15]. Briefly, RNA was isolated using the RNAeasy kit (Qiagen), treated with DNaseI (Invitrogen), and 2 μg RNA reverse-transcribed using Superscript III™ (Invitrogen). PCR was performed with primers (K15ExBFor, 5'-TTCAAGACCCCCAGATGGAGAAAAG-3' and K15Ex2Rev, 5'-CTTCCAGCAACTTGTCACCA-3') for 35 cycles with conditions of 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C, 64°C and 72°C for 1 min each, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR for β2-microglobulin was used as an internal control. The PCR products were visualised by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. Genomic DNA was extracted using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilde, Germany). Four primer sets (Additional file 3) were designed using NETprimer http://www.premierbiosoft.com/netprimer/index.html to amplify segments of the putative KLK15 promoter region with the greatest density of likely functional SNPs, based on results from the in silico analysis. All reactions (20 uL) contained 10 ng of genomic DNA, 0.25 uM of each region specific primer (Proligo, Lismore, NSW, Australia), 0.2 mM dNTP mix (Roche, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia), 0.03 mM Magnesium Chloride (Invitrogen, Victoria, Australia). Denaturing agents DMSO and betaine (Sigma) were added to destabilize secondary structures in the template, and improve both the PCR and sequencing quality. PCR products were sequenced at the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF, Brisbane, Australia) using dideoxy dye chain-termination technology (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were aligned and analyzed using SeqMan™II (DNASTAR, WI, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Survival time was calculated from date of diagnosis to date of death (from ovarian cancer) or censored at 1 September, 2004 or death from another cause. The Kaplan-Meier technique was used to estimate crude overall survival probabilities, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from Cox regression models adjusted for age group, FIGO stage, histologic subtype and grade. The TCGA dataset was adjusted for age, FIGO stage and histologic grade, but not subtype because all the samples were of the serous subtype. For the combined analysis, a weighted average of the log HR was calculated, taking into account random effects using the method of DerSimonian and Laird [23]. Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) maps were generated using Haploview 4.2 [24].

Results

Analysis of KLK15transcripts

All of the published KLK15 mRNA variants [25] were collated from GenBank (Figure 1A). Six isoforms were observed. The classical form, isoform 4 (NM_017509), has five exons and encodes a protein of 256 amino acids (aa). However, this was recently extended to include an additional 5' untranslated exon (exon A) discovered from an EST clone (CF139951). Another 3 known isoforms (1-3) encode 3 different length proteins of 122aa, 161aa and 171aa respectively. Isoform 5 (AY373373) and isoform 6 (AY373374) both encode proteins of 162aa, since they share the same stop codon at the beginning of intron 3; the additional loss of exon 4 for isoform 6 does not affect protein length (Figure 1A). Isoform 5 was found to form the most stable secondary structure based on ΔG values predicted by mfold, while isoform 3 was the least stable (data not shown).

Figure 1
figure 1

Diagrammatic representation of human KLK15 mRNA transcripts and confirmation of the exon B variant by RT-PCR. (A) Various isoforms (1-6) of KLK15 derived from the NCBI database are shown with the two new isoforms identified from the EST database containing novel exons, A and B, highlighted in red boxes. The unshaded boxes represent the noncoding exons, shaded black boxes for the isoforms represent the coding exons and the connecting lines the introns. Numbers inside boxes or above connecting lines represent exon or intron lengths in base pairs respectively. H, denotes histidine; S, denotes serine; and D, denotes aspartate [amino acids of the catalytic triad of the (putative) encoded proteins]. The arrowhead points to the common start codon and astericks (*) to the stop codon positions. (B) PCR was conducted on the cDNA from five different cell lines HOSE17.1 (1), PEO1 (2), OVCA432 (3), SKOV3 (4), LNCaP (5) and no cDNA (6) using the Forward primer in exon B and reverse primer in exon 2. Two products were obtained corresponding to with (144 bp) and without (70 bp) exon 1.

Full size image

We also identified an additional KLK15 splice variant from the three new EST clones (GenBank accession No. BP428687, BP431267, BP431386). This new isoform has a novel exon between exon A and exon 1, that we have named exon B. Exon B is located 1575 bp upstream from exon 1, however all three EST clones show that exon B is spliced onto exon 2, skipping exon 1 (Figure 1A). The longest clone encodes a protein that is 106 aa long, shorter than that observed for the other isoforms; however it does not contain a stop codon and therefore is likely to be an incomplete sequence (Figure 1A). Using SignalP 3.0 Server and PSORT II, the exon B variant was not predicted to contain a possible cleavage site for an N-terminal signal peptide, thus is most likely to be an intracellular protein. In contrast, the other isoforms all are predicted to have signal peptides and a predominantly cytoplasmic and extracellular localization as expected for secreted proteins. The exon B variant was confirmed by RT-PCR in serous ovarian epithelial cancer cell lines PEO1 and OVCA432 and also in the prostate cancer LNCaP cell lines (Figure 1B).

In silicopromoter analysis to prioritize regions for sequencing and SNP modeling

Cister and JASPAR together identified 30 putative Androgen Response Elements (AREs) (15 upstream of exon A, 1 in exon A, 8 between exon A and B, 2 in exon B, and 4 between exon B and 1). Only 2 AREs (Figure 2A) were predicted by both tools (1 upstream of exon A and the other between exon B and exon 1). Dragon ERE finder and Cister predicted 30 putative Estrogen Response Elements (EREs) upstream of exon 1 (17 upstream exon A, 9 between exon A and B, and 4 between exon B and 1). Four EREs (Figure 2A) predicted by Dragon ERE finder overlapped an ERE predicted by Cister. Cister identified two clusters of cis-elements (Figure 2A), both upstream of exon A. The first cluster starts 4232 bp upstream of exon A, spans 467 bp and contains eight putative cis-elements. The second cluster starts 2108 bp upstream of exon A, spans 1892 bp and contains 10 putative cis-elements. Two putative promoter regions on the forward strand were detected using WWW Promoter Scan The first putative promoter is 189 bp downstream of exon A and spans 250 bp, and the second is 852 bp downstream of exon A and spans 252 bp. PromoterInspector detected one putative promoter region which is 992 bp downstream of exon A and spans 463 bp. CpGPlot showed three putative CpG islands with a percent C+G of above 50%, observed/expected ratio of above 0.60 and a length of over 100 bp: the first is 4519 bp upstream of exon A and spans 115 bp; the second is 538 bp downstream of exon A and spans 106 bp; the third is 778 bp downstream of exon A and spans 564 bp. The last two putative CpG islands overlap putative promoters found by WWW Promoter Scan and PromoterInspector (Figure 2A).

Figure 2
figure 2

The putative KLK15 promoter region: (A) The 11 kb region upstream of exon 1 on chromosome 19 (56020307 to 56037591 bp, NCBI build 36.3) was downloaded for in silico analysis (A) schematic of the 5' region of the KLK15 gene with significant motifs noted: 2 putative Androgen Response Elements (AREs) were found by both JASPAR and Cister programs (red arrows); 4 putative Estrogen Response Elements (EREs) were found by both ERE finder and Cister programs (blue arrows); 2 putative cis-element clusters which indicate putative promoter regions found by Cister (green arrows); 2 putative promoter regions that overlap with CpG islands found by WWWPromoter Scan, Promoter Inspector and CpG Island Finder (yellow arrows) (B) AREs (boxes), EREs (triangle) and Nuclear Hormone Receptor Binding Sites (NHRBs) (circles) as predicted by individual softwares. The ARE "cluster" consists of 16 AREs. The colored bars (blue, red, green, orange, yellow) in the sequence indicate the 5 regions that were chosen for sequencing genomic DNA. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-modeling results are shown by color coding the functional SNPs validated in bold. Orange and red text coloring indicate a gain or loss of ERE motifs respectively, while green and blue indicate ARE gain or loss. The two brown SNPs indicate a loss of one ERE and a loss of two AREs. An additional four validated SNPs viz rs2659052, rs11880663, rs2659051, rs2659055 have been added to NCBI databases (not modeled here) from the time of our analysis.

Full size image

SNP information and prediction of functional effects

Gene

A total of 76 (27 validated) SNPs in the exonic-intronic region of KLK15 were retrieved from the NCBI dbSNP database, comprising 10 exonic SNPs (4 non-synonymous, 1 synonymous and 5 in 3' UTR) (Additional file 4) and 66 intronic SNPs (data not shown). Although predicted to be damaging by FastSNP, SIFT and PolyPhen predicted that the validated non-synonymous (ns) exonic SNPs were unlikely to have any deleterious effect on protein structure (Additional file 4). FastSNP server predicted that the synonymous (s) SNP and the 3' UTR SNPs were not damaging with a risk score of 0-1 (Additional file 4). The rs3212852 SNP present at the 3' end of exon 3 was predicted to have a damaging effect with a medium-high risk score of 3-4. No damaging scores were observed for the additional 5 intronic SNPs located within 30 bp of exon-intron boundaries. We also predicted miRNA binding sites using three different software programs; Target Scan, miRanda and Patrocles. A maximum of 32 miRNA binding sites scattered throughout the gene were predicted by miRanda (data not shown). Interestingly, the 3'UTR SNP rs3212810 lies in the target sequence of mir-498, which has been reported to be dysregulated in prostate cancers [26]. Also, rs3212853 was predicted to be a potential polymorphic miRNA target site (using Patrocles target database), where the presence of the mutant allele creates a binding site for miR-193b (Additional file 4), shown to be involved in tumor progression and invasion in human breast cancer [27] and a tumor suppressor in prostate cancer [28].

Promoter

As gene expression may be influenced by promoter polymorphisms, we included analysis of SNPs in the 11 kb upstream region from exon 1 and found 62 (out of the total 101) validated SNPs. In silico analysis predicted that 8 SNPs created a new putative ERE/ARE site while 10 other SNPs were predicted to destroy one or more putative ERE/ARE sites using two different software programs; JASPAR and Cister for the ARE and Cistor and Dragon ERE finder for the ERE (Figure 2B). Further, it was observed that 22 SNPs created one or more new transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) while 25 SNPs completely lost one or more TFBS as predicted by Genomatrix ElDorado program (data not shown).

Promoter sequencing of cancer cell lines and aggressive cancer patients

To confirm the polymorphic status of reported SNPs and identify novel SNPs with potential prognostic significance, we sequenced genomic DNA within the KLK15 promoter (Figure 2B) of four ovarian (normal -HOSE17.1; cancer- OVCA432, SKOV3 and PEO1) cell lines and the germline DNA of 30 ovarian cancer patients with aggressive disease. Sequencing analysis of the cell lines validated 15 SNPs, including 6 non-validated SNPs in the NCBI database (Additional file 5). Sequencing of genomic DNA from aggressive ovarian cancer patients validated additional 5 SNPs (Additional file 5), and identified two novel SNPs that were not predicted to be functionally relevant. Seven SNPs from the NCBI database were found to be non-polymorphic in our sequencing cohort. The putative functional role of the promoter SNPs is provided in Additional file 5.

LD mapping and SNPs selection for survival studies

SNPs chosen for genotyping in this study were (i) identified as tagging SNPs using HapMap version 22 (April 07), using a minor allele frequency >0.05 and pairwise linkage disequilibrium threshold of r2 > 0.8 (rs2659058, rs3212810, rs3745522, rs2659056, rs266851, rs2163861, rs266856), or (ii) chosen due to the above reported in silico prediction of functional effect on KLK15 expression (rs3212853, rs3212852, rs16987576, rs2659055, rs266853, rs266854, rs190552, rs266855, rs2739442, rs2033496, rs12978902, rs2659053, rs2569746, rs35711205, rs2569747) (Table 1). As the frequency data for many of these SNPs were not available, we genotyped all 22 SNPs in controls and generated the LD map using Haploview 4.2 (Batra et al, unpublished data; Additional File 6). All SNPs except rs3745522 were found to follow Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p < 0.01). SNP rs12978902 was non-polymorphic, while rs3212853, rs3212852, rs16987576 rs266853 and rs266854 were found to have minor allele frequencies < 0.05 (Table 1), so were not pursued further for the survival analysis. SNPs in high LD with other SNPs (r2 > 0.9) were also not pursued further. Priority was given to putative functional SNPs, with a total of 12 SNPs shortlisted for further analysis (Table 1). Three of these SNPs (rs2659056, rs266855 and rs35711205) could not be genotyped in ovarian cancer samples because of assay incompatibilities.

Table 1 SNP selection for the survival studies.
Full size table

Association with ovarian cancer survival

Among the 319 Australian women with ovarian cancer, 188 (59%) died from the disease during the follow-up period, with a 5-year survival proportion of 45%. Selected clinical and pathologic characteristics of the Australian women and the women in the two independent datasets, the UK GWAS and TCGA, are shown in Table 2. Among the Australian women a little over three quarters were older than ≥50 years at diagnosis (77%), and many presented with late stage disease (71%), tumors of high grade (54%) and serous histological subtype (64%). In the UK GWAS dataset most women were ≥50 years at diagnosis (78%), just over half the group had early stage disease (56%) and serous histological subtype (54%). The TCGA dataset comprised women who were mostly older than ≥50 years at diagnosis (79%), and the majority had late stage (95%), high grade (88%) disease and all were of serous histologic subtype.

Table 2 Summary of clinical and pathological factors in the Australian, UK GWAS and TCGA ovarian cancer datasets.
Full size table

SNP rs266851 showed statistically significant evidence for an association with worse survival (Table 3) in the Australian dataset. Increased risk was observed for the heterozygote genotype CT (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.00), and also for the rare (2% of sample) homozygote genotype (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.49-3.24); p trend = 0.01. Overall association under a dominant model was HR 1.42 with 95% CI = 1.02-1.96 (Table 3). This SNP was not found to be associated with ovarian cancer stage (p = 0.41) or grade (p = 0.39) (Table 2). None of the other SNPs investigated were associated with ovarian cancer survival in Australian dataset.

Table 3 Association between KLK15 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and ovarian cancer survival in Australian dataset
Full size table

In an attempt to replicate our results, we analyzed genotype data obtained from the UK GWAS and the TCGA datasets of ovarian cancer survival. We observed a similar direction of association in both the datasets for the dominant model (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.94 -1.24 in UK GWAS data and HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.90-1.61 in TCGA data) (Table 4). Combining the results of these two studies (UK GWAS and TCGA data) with our data gave a summary HR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.0-1.35) for the SNP rs266851 under a dominant model (Table 4).

Table 4 Results of ovarian cancer survival analysis for the KLK15 rs266851 SNP in Australian, UK GWAS data, TCGA data and the combined datasets
Full size table

Putative functional elements associated with SNP rs266851

The rs266851 SNP is predicted to have a FastSNP score = 0 in our initial analysis. As the FastSNP algorithm is weighted by the SNP position with respect to gene structure, and our data shows that rs266851 SNP is located 15 bp 3' of a novel exon B, we used ESEfinder [29] to predict the putative role of rs266851 SNP in mRNA splicing. ESEfinder prediction suggests loss of various SRp binding sites in the presence of T allele (Additional file 7), thus this SNP could be involved in alternative mRNA splicing.

Our preliminary unpublished data (Lai et al., personal communication) suggest that exon B could be an alternative transcription start site (data not shown). Thus, using the TFbind webtool [30], we predicted that the C to T change may abrogate the binding site for Heat Shock Factor 2 (HSF2), which activates expression of Heat Shock Proteins (HSP), which have been shown to play a vital role in tumorigenesis [31, 32].

Discussion

With the completion of the human genome project, an enormous amount of data has been generated and been made available to the research community through various database repositories. At the same time many bioinformatic/in silico tools have been made available to extract data and help conceptualize future studies. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use a comprehensive in silico approach for genetic data mining and regulatory region identification to direct SNP prioritization studies of the KLK15 gene and to analyze the association of KLK15 polymorphisms with ovarian cancer survival.

In our efforts to delineate the functional significance of the exonic SNPs, we used the Polyphen and SIFT algorithms which showed minimal associations of SNPs with likely functional amino-acid replacements. We thus proposed that SNPs in regulatory regions can act in cis or trans, by leading to gain or deletion of a TFBS. In order to identify the KLK15 promoter-regulatory region, multiple alignments of all the KLK15 splice variants and ESTs available in databases identified a novel isoform with a new exon (termed exon B), upstream of exon 1. This isoform utilizes exon B instead of exon 1 and is predicted to have a different function by encoding a protein lacking a signal peptide. Alternative KLK transcripts may possess both physiological and prognostic significance and some are emerging candidate biomarkers [25, 33, 34]. For example, the PSA-RP2 [35] and KLK15 isoform 3 [11, 36] are upregulated in prostate cancer compared with benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues suggesting that differential mRNA splicing may be an important regulatory event in carcinogenesis. Thus, the novel exon B variant identified by this study needs to be explored further to assess its biological function and prognostic significance, and such studies are underway in our laboratory.

In order to assess the role of common genetic variation in altered regulation of KLK15, and with the knowledge that steroid hormones have been implicated in the etiology and/or progression of epithelial ovarian cancer [3], we analyzed the in silico recognized promoter regions for putative AREs and EREs. Though the results varied using different databases, overlapping predictions suggested the gain/loss of AREs and EREs in this region. We thus prioritized and confirmed the polymorphic status of the SNPs in this region by sequencing genomic DNA from four ovarian cell lines and 30 ovarian cancer patients. Of these putative functional and HapMap tag SNPs selected for genotyping, rs266851 was found to be associated with poor overall survival in ovarian cancer in the Australian cohort, The results were not found to be statistically significant in the TCGA and UK GWAS cohorts but were similar in magnitude and direction to that of Australian dataset. This is what might be expected for "winner's curse" phenomenon, where the estimated effect of a marker allele from the initial study reporting the association is often exaggerated relative to the estimated effect in follow-up studies. The difference in magnitude of risk estimates may also be partially explained by different case ascertainment criteria. In particular, follow-up of the large majority of the UK GWAS dataset was initiated at least 6 months after diagnosis through the cancer registry, biasing against recruitment of ovarian cancer cases with short-term survival after diagnosis, and resulting in a dataset that included more women with early FIGO stage disease (56% vs. 21% FIGO stage I and II) and fewer women diagnosed with serous ovarian cancer (47% vs. 66%). Consequently the 5-year survival rate was much higher in the UK GWAS dataset (77% compared to 45% for the Australian dataset), and it is interesting to note that the UK dataset showed the risk estimate of lowest magnitude (HR = 1.07). In contrast, the TCGA dataset with similar characteristics to the Australian dataset showed a risk estimate of greater magnitude (HR = 1.20), although still not as great as the initial risk estimate observed for the Australian dataset (HR 1.42). The overall pooled HR of 1.16 observed for the dominant model in our combined analysis is consistent with an association between rs266851 SNP and ovarian cancer survival in Australian dataset, and it would be important to confirm these findings in a larger sample set of incident cases. Interestingly, the rs266851 SNP was found to be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in the Cancer Genetics Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) project Breast Cancer GWAS [37] with a trend p value = 0.008; heterozygote risk = 1.22 (1.05-1.41); homozygote risk = 1.49 (1.11-2.00) (cases N = 1145, controls N = 1142).

So far no other SNP has been found to be in complete LD with rs266851 from HapMap and next generation sequencing data. Using in silico analysis, we predicted that rs266851 could potentially be involved in differential mRNA splicing as the mutant allele was found to abrogate the binding site for the SRp55 and SF2/ASF splicing factors. There are several reports of elevated SR protein family expression associated with ovarian cancer [38] and SF2/ASF, specifically, has been described as a proto-oncogene [39]. We also propose that rs266851 might be involved in regulation of KLK15 transcription by altering the HSF-2 binding site. Recently an HSF-2 binding site has been detected in the KLK5 and KLK7 promoter-regulatory regions and their expression has been found to correlate with HSF-2 expression in microarray analysis of breast malignancies [40]. Nevertheless, more experimental evidence is required to understand the effects of this variant on KLK15 expression and/or splicing.

Conclusions

This study supports a role of the KLK15 gene in ovarian cancer by providing suggestive evidence for an association of the rs266851 SNP with ovarian cancer survival. The location of this SNP adjacent to a novel exon B and in putative HSF2 and SRp binding sites should provide impetus for downstream functional assays and additional independent validation studies to assess the role of KLK15 regulatory SNPs and KLK15 isoforms with alternative intracellular functional roles in ovarian cancer survival. Our study also has applicability to studies investigating the role of KLK15 genetic variation in other hormone-related cancers, namely prostate, endometrial and breast cancer.

References

  1. Brookfield KF, Cheung MC, Koniaris LG, Sola JE, Fischer AC: A population-based analysis of 1037 malignant ovarian tumors in the pediatric population. J Surg Res. 2009, 156 (1): 45-49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tinelli A, Vergara D, Martignago R, Leo G, Pisano M, Malvasi A: An outlook on ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: focus on genomic and proteomic findings. Curr Genomics. 2009, 10 (4): 240-249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lengyel E: Ovarian cancer development and metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2010, 177 (3): 1053-1064.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sotiropoulou G, Pampalakis G, Diamandis EP: Functional roles of human Kallikrein-related peptidases. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284 (48): 32989-32994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawrence MG, Lai J, Clements JA: Kallikreins on Steroids: Structure, Function, and Hormonal Regulation of Prostate-Specific Antigen and the Extended Kallikrein Locus. Endocr Rev. 2010, 31 (4): 407-446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clements JA: Reflections on the tissue kallikrein and kallikrein-related peptidase family - from mice to men - what have we learnt in the last two decades?. Biol Chem. 2008, 389 (12): 1447-1454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Emami N, Diamandis EP: Utility of kallikrein-related peptidases (KLKs) as cancer biomarkers. Clin Chem. 2008, 54 (10): 1600-1607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yousef GM, Scorilas A, Jung K, Ashworth LK, Diamandis EP: Molecular cloning of the human kallikrein 15 gene (KLK15). Up-regulation in prostate cancer. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (1): 53-61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaw JL, Diamandis EP: Distribution of 15 human kallikreins in tissues and biological fluids. Clin Chem. 2007, 53 (8): 1423-1432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diamandis EP, Yousef GM: Human tissue kallikrein gene family: a rich source of novel disease biomarkers. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2001, 1 (2): 182-190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mavridis K, Avgeris M, Koutalellis G, Stravodimos K, Scorilas A: Expression analysis and study of the KLK15 mRNA splice variants in prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cancer Science. 2010, 101 (3): 693-699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yousef GM, Scorilas A, Katsaros D, Fracchioli S, Iskander L, Borgono C, Rigault de la Longrais IA, Puopolo M, Massobrio M, Diamandis EP: Prognostic Value of the Human Kallikrein Gene 15 Expression in Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21 (16): 3119-3126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yousef GM, Scorilas A, Magklara A, Memari N, Ponzone R, Sismondi P, Biglia N, Abd Ellatif M, Diamandis EP: The androgen-regulated gene human kallikrein 15 (KLK15) is an independent and favourable prognostic marker for breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002, 87 (11): 1294-1300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Steven SC, Ingrid JH: A Review of Genetic Polymorphisms and Prostate Cancer Risk. Annals of epidemiology. 2002, 12 (3): 182-196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Batra J, Tan OL, O'Mara T, Zammit R, Nagle CM, Clements JA, Kedda MA, Spurdle AB: Kallikrein-related peptidase 10 (KLK10) expression and single nucleotide polymorphisms in ovarian cancer survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010, 20 (4): 529-536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eeles RA, Kote-Jarai Z, Al Olama AA, Giles GG, Guy M, Severi G, Muir K, Hopper JL, Henderson BE, Haiman CA, et al: Identification of seven new prostate cancer susceptibility loci through a genome-wide association study. Nat Genet. 2009, 41 (10): 1116-1121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lai J, Kedda MA, Hinze K, Smith RL, Yaxley J, Spurdle AB, Morris CP, Harris J, Clements JA: PSA/KLK3 AREI promoter polymorphism alters androgen receptor binding and is associated with prostate cancer susceptibility. Carcinogenesis. 2007, 28 (5): 1032-1039.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lose F, Nagle CM, O'Mara T, Batra J, Bolton KL, Song H, Ramus SJ, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Gayther SA, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms and ovarian cancer survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  19. Song H, Ramus SJ, Kjaer SK, DiCioccio RA, Chenevix-Trench G, Pearce CL, Hogdall E, Whittemore AS, McGuire V, Hogdall C, et al: Association between invasive ovarian cancer susceptibility and 11 best candidate SNPs from breast cancer genome-wide association study. Hum Mol Genet. 2009, 18 (12): 2297-2304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. TCGA Website. [http://cancergenome.nih.gov]

  21. Lawrence MG, Veveris-Lowe TL, Whitbread AK, Nicol DL, Clements JA: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer and the potential role of kallikrein serine proteases. Cells Tissues Organs. 2007, 185 (1-3): 111-115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yousef GM, Diamandis EP: An overview of the kallikrein gene families in humans and other species: emerging candidate tumour markers. Clin Biochem. 2003, 36 (6): 443-452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986, 7 (3): 177-188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (2): 263-265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kurlender L, Borgono C, Michael IP, Obiezu C, Elliott MB, Yousef GM, Diamandis EP: A survey of alternative transcripts of human tissue kallikrein genes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1755 (1): 1-14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Porkka KP, Pfeiffer MJ, Waltering KK, Vessella RL, Tammela TL, Visakorpi T: MicroRNA expression profiling in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (13): 6130-6135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li XF, Yan PJ, Shao ZM: Downregulation of miR-193b contributes to enhance urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) expression and tumor progression and invasion in human breast cancer. Oncogene. 2009, 28 (44): 3937-3948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rauhala HE, Jalava SE, Isotalo J, Bracken H, Lehmusvaara S, Tammela TL, Oja H, Visakorpi T: miR-193b is an epigenetically regulated putative tumor suppressor in prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  29. ESEfinder website. [http://rulai.cshl.edu/cgi-bin/tools/ESE3/esefinder.cgi?process=home]

  30. TFbind webtool. [http://tfbind.hgc.jp/]

  31. Olejek A, Damasiewicz-Bodzek A, Bodzek P, Wielkoszynski T, Zamlynski J, Stoltny P, Skutil M: Concentrations of antibodies against heat shock protein 27 in the sera of women with ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009, 19 (9): 1516-1520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Laskowska E, Matuszewska E, Kuczynska-Wisnik D: Small Heat Shock Proteins and Protein-Misfolding Diseases. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tan OL, Whitbread AK, Clements JA, Dong Y: Kallikrein-related peptidase (KLK) family mRNA variants and protein isoforms in hormone-related cancers: do they have a function?. Biol Chem. 2006, 387 (6): 697-705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yousef GM, White NM, Kurlender L, Michael I, Memari N, Robb JD, Katsaros D, Stephan C, Jung K, Diamandis EP: The kallikrein gene 5 splice variant 2 is a new biomarker for breast and ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol. 2004, 25 (5-6): 221-227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Whitbread AK, Veveris-Lowe TL, Dong Y, Tan OL, Gardiner R, Samaratunga HM, Nicol DL, Clements JA: Expression of PSA-RP2, an alternatively spliced variant from the PSA gene, is increased in prostate cancer tissues but the protein is not secreted from prostate cancer cells. Biol Chem. 2010, 391 (4): 461-466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rabien A, Fritzsche FR, Jung M, Tolle A, Diamandis EP, Miller K, Jung K, Kristiansen G, Stephan C: KLK15 is a prognostic marker for progression-free survival in patients with radical prostatectomy. Int J Cancer. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cancer Genetics Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) website. [http://cgems.cancer.gov]

  38. Fischer DC, Noack K, Runnebaum IB, Watermann DO, Kieback DG, Stamm S, Stickeler E: Expression of splicing factors in human ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. 2004, 11 (5): 1085-1090.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Karni R, de Stanchina E, Lowe SW, Sinha R, Mu D, Krainer AR: The gene encoding the splicing factor SF2/ASF is a proto-oncogene. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007, 14 (3): 185-193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li X, Liu J, Wang Y, Zhang L, Ning L, Feng Y: Parallel underexpression of kallikrein 5 and kallikrein 7 mRNA in breast malignancies. Cancer Sci. 2009, 100 (4): 601-607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements and Funding

We thank the patients and control subjects who participated so willingly in our studies. For the Australian sample sets, the authors are very grateful to staff at the Australian Red Cross Blood Services for their assistance with the collection of risk factor information and blood samples of healthy donor controls. We thank Georgia Chenevix-Trench for access to DNA samples and associated data for the ovarian cancer and SNP association studies. We thank the SEARCH team and the Eastern Cancer Registration and Information Centre. The results published here are in part based upon data generated by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Pilot Project established by the NCI and NHGRI. Information about TCGA and the investigators and institutions who constitute the TCGA research network can be found at http://cancergenome.nih.gov.

ABS and JAC are NHMRC Senior and Principal Research Fellows respectively. CMN is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Award. JB and OLT are supported by Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Postdoctoral Fellowships. TOM is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award complemented with an IHBI and QLD Government Smart State Postgraduate Awards. SEARCH is funded through a program grant from Cancer Research UK. This work was supported by funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) grant 390123.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Prostate Cancer Research centre-Queensland and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Queensland, 4059, Australia

    Jyotsna Batra, Tracy O'Mara, Melanie Higgins, Ying Dong, Olivia L Tan, Lene Marie Skeie, Srilakshmi Srinivasan, Mary-Anne Kedda & Judith A Clements

  2. Molecular Cancer Epidemiology Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, 4006, Australia

    Jyotsna Batra, Tracy O'Mara, Melanie Higgins, Felicity Lose & Amanda B Spurdle

  3. Gynaecological Cancer Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, 4006, Australia

    Christina M Nagle

  4. Cancer Research UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK

    Kelly L Bolton, Honglin Song & Paul DP Pharoah

  5. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA

    Kelly L Bolton

  6. Department of Gynecological Oncology, University College London, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK

    Susan J Ramus & Simon A Gayther

Authors
  1. Jyotsna Batra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina M Nagle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tracy O'Mara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Melanie Higgins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ying Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Olivia L Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Felicity Lose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lene Marie Skeie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Srilakshmi Srinivasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kelly L Bolton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Honglin Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Susan J Ramus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Simon A Gayther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Paul DP Pharoah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Mary-Anne Kedda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Amanda B Spurdle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Judith A Clements
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith A Clements.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

JB organised the data, prepared the manuscript and performed sequencing and bioinformatic analyses; CMN performed statistical analyses; TOM performed the genotyping of Australian samples; MH, LMS, FL and SS helped in bioinformatic analysis and sequencing; YD and OLT performed RT PCR and sequence alignment; KB, HS, SR, SG and PP contributed to the production and analysis of the UK genome-wide association study; MAK, ABS and JAC conceived the study, participated in the design and coordination of the study; ABS and JAC helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

12885_2010_2612_MOESM1_ESM.DOC

Additional file 1: Access information for KLK15. Information for KLK15 gene and its protein product was obtained from different databases and is outlined in the additional file1. (DOC 47 KB)

12885_2010_2612_MOESM2_ESM.DOC

Additional file 2: In silico promoter and SNP analysis. Additional file 2 details the different websites and software used to scan the promoter region of KLK15 and to predict the functional significance of single nucleotide polymorphisms in and around the gene. (DOC 40 KB)

12885_2010_2612_MOESM3_ESM.DOC

Additional file 3: Primer sequences. Additional file 3 details the primer sequence used for sequencing the KLK15 promoter region (DOC 32 KB)

12885_2010_2612_MOESM4_ESM.XLS

Additional file 4: KLK15 intragenic SNPs and the results of in silico analysis. Additional file 4 details the SNPs in KLK15 exon and exon Intron boundary and the results of in silico analysis on these SNPS. (XLS 132 KB)

12885_2010_2612_MOESM5_ESM.XLS

Additional file 5: Validated KLK15 promoter SNPs. SNPs validated by KLK15 promoter sequencing of genomic DNA from ovarian cell lines and aggressive patients and their predictive functional role. (XLS 40 KB)

12885_2010_2612_MOESM6_ESM.PNG

Additional file 6: Linkage Disequilibrium map generated by Haploview 4.2. Frequency data was generated for the control individuals and the LD map was plotted. SNPs not in bold were found to have frequencies < 0.05. (PNG 59 KB)

12885_2010_2612_MOESM7_ESM.XLS

Additional file 7: Prediction of functional role of the rs266851 SNP. ESE Finder Matrices analysis for SRp40, SC35, SF2/ASF and SRp55 splicing proteins. (XLS 28 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batra, J., Nagle, C.M., O'Mara, T. et al. A Kallikrein 15 (KLK15) single nucleotide polymorphism located close to a novel exon shows evidence of association with poor ovarian cancer survival. BMC Cancer 11, 119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-119

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us