Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Comparison of prevalence, viral load, physical status and expression of human papillomavirus-16, -18 and -58 in esophageal and cervical cancer: a case-control study

BMC Cancer volume 10, Article number: 650 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a major risk factor for the development of nearly all cases of cervical cancer worldwide. The presence of HPV DNA in cases of esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been reported repeatedly from Shantou, China, and other regions with a high incidence of esophageal carcinoma (EC). However, unlike in cervical squamous-cell carcinoma (CSCC), in ESCC, the characteristics of HPV are unclear. Thus, the role of high-risk HPV types in the carcinogenesis of ESCC remains uncertain.

Methods

Seventy cases of ESCC with 60 controls and 39 cases of CSCC with 54 controls collected from patients in Shantou region in China were compared for the distributions of HPV-16, -18 and -58; viral load; and viral integration using real-time PCR assay and HPV-16 expression using immunostaining.

Results

The detection rates and viral loads of HR-HPV infection were significantly lower in ESCC than in CSCC (50.0% vs. 79.48%, P = 0.005; 2.55 ± 3.19 vs. 361.29 ± 441.75, P = 0.002, respectively). The combined integration level of HPV-16, -18 and -58 was slightly lower in ESCC than in CSCC (P = 0.022). HPV-16 expression was detected in 59.26% of ESCC tissue and significantly associated with tumour grade (P = 0.027).

Conclusions

High levels of HR-HPV expression and integration may be an indicator of the risk of ESCC, at least for patients in the Shantou region of China. However, a relatively low HPV copy number and infection rate in ESCC is unlikely to play an essential a role in the carcinogenesis of ESCC as in cervical cancer. Factors other than HR-HPV infection may contribute to the carcinogenesis of ESCC.

Peer Review reports

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) occurs worldwide and has a variable geographic distribution [1]. The Shantou coastal area of eastern Guangdong province, in southern China, has a high incidence of esophageal carcinoma (EC) [2]. Tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, dietary deficiency, and some local factors, including drinking hot tea and consumption of fermented fish sauce, may be involved in the development of EC in this region [3, 4]. However, the etiology of EC is still largely unknown.

The association of HPV infection and EC has been reported in the last 30 years, especially in geographic areas with a high incidence of EC. However, unlike cervical carcinoma, with its almost conclusive association with HPV, the causal role of HPV infection in EC remains controversial. This lack of association is due in part to the wide variation in reported infection rates among different studies (from 0% to more than 60%), and few studies have related HPV status to genetic changes [5]. These variations may reflect a difference in HPV infection rates in EC cases collected from different geographic regions. However, differences in sensitivity and specificity of the detection methods may also be contributors. Previously, we found a high prevalence of HPV infection in esophageal cancerous (65.5%) and para-cancerous (69.1%) tissues and matched normal esophagus (60.0%) tissues in the Shantou region by a regular PCR method [6]. In addition, our in vitro experiments indicated that expression of the HPV-18 E6/7 gene was sufficient to induce cellular immortality, including cellular proliferation, telomerase activity and chromosome instability [7].

More than 40 genotypes of HPV that infect the anogenital area are associated with a large spectrum of diseases from benign proliferative to invasive cancers. In China, a meta-analysis revealed that high percentages of cervical cancer cases mainly attributed to the 3 most frequent high-risk types of HPV (HR-HPV): HPV-16 is involved in more than half of the cervical cancer cases, and HPV-18 and -58, approximately 11.0% and 7.2%, respectively [8]. Recent studies have suggested a high correlation between HR-HPV viral load (notably HPV-16) and high-grade squamous-cell intraepithelial lesions [9, 10]. In addition, the disruption of the HPV E2 gene during viral integration, which results in a loss of its function as a regulator of viral oncogene expression and subsequent upregulation of E6/E7 gene transcription, may initiate cell transformation and immortality by deregulating the tumor suppressor gene products p53 and retinoblastoma protein [11]. Thus, both HR-HPV DNA load and its integration may be 2 candidate markers that could help identify high risk of progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasms and forecast cervical lesions in patients with chronic infection. In addition, despite multiple investigations based on various study designs and methodologies, the clinical utility of HR-HPV DNA load remains unclear [12].

Only one study detailing the characteristics of HR-HPV DNA load in ESCC from the Shantou region has been reported; median copy numbers (11.7-14.6 copies/genome equivalents) were relatively higher than that in other regions in China, with frequent integration of HPV-16 DNA in the host genome. In this study, only four HPV-16-positive ESCC cases were detected [13]. Thus, a discrepancy in findings is inevitable considering the relatively small number of samples. We aimed to characterize the prevalence, viral load and physical status of the 3 most common HPV types, HR-HPV-16, -18 and - 58, in ESCC and CSCC and their corresponding control tissues. We used a real-time PCR-based method for measurement of HPV-16, -18 and -58 viral load and physical status in clinical samples. This method is accurate and sensitive for detecting as few as 50 copies of integrated HPV DNA in clinical samples [14]. We hoped to increase our knowledge of HR-HPV-induced esophageal and cervical carcinogenesis. Further, HPV-16 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to evaluate its role in ESCC tissue.

Methods

Subjects and Study Design

The study was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shantou University Medical College. All subjects gave their written informed consent to participate in the study (Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, China).

Fresh ESCC tissue was from 70 patients with ESCC (49 males; mean age 57.32 ± 8.44 years; 21 females; mean age 59.95 ± 8.77 years) and 60 subjects with normal esophageal tissue (38 males; mean age 31.73 ± 8.62 years; 22 females; mean age 45.91 ± 5.72 years) from the Department of Thoracic Surgery in the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from 2002 to 2006. Control samples were from post-mortem paraffin-embedded esophageal tissue without lesions of subjects who died due to trauma (in the hospital or daily life [mainly traffic accidents and regular daily labor]) or cardiocerebrovascular disease. Fresh CSCC tissue was from 39 patients with CSCC (mean age 43.10 ± 8.16 years) and 54 patients with normal cervical tissue (mean age 44.14 ± 8.27 years) from the Department of Gynecological Tumors of the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from 2006 to 2008. We collected 54 paraffin-embedded samples from each of 54 ESCC patients (mean age 52.52 ± 9.89 years) from the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from 1991 to 1995. All subjects had lived or were living in the Shantou region.

Hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections from ESCC, CSCC, and corresponding control tissue were reviewed by Professor Shen Zhongying from the Institute of Oncology Pathology to confirm the original findings and define representative tumor regions. Tumor stage and grade were defined according to the World Health Organization histological classification criteria [15].

HPV plasmid construction

pMD™ 18-T Simple Vector (Takara Biotechnology [DALIAN] Co., Japan) plasmids containing E2 and E6/7 genes for HPV-16, -18, -58 were prepared by cloning their corresponding PCR products from clinical samples. The inserted fragments were confirmed by sequencing and PCR amplification. The plasmids were used as positive controls. PCR primer sequences are in Table 1.

Table 1 PCR primer sequences for human papillomavirus (HPV) and β-globin
Full size table

Real-time PCR for HR-HPV E2 and E6/7

Fresh samples from the ESCC and CSCC cases and their controls were used for HPV detection and genotyping with high-sensitive real-time PCR. The plasmid stock solutions were diluted in sterile water to obtain a quantification gradient of 1010, 108, 106, 104, 102 and 1 copy. Real-time PCR reactions involved use of an ABI Prism® 7300 system. The 25-μl reaction mixture included SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara Biotechnology [DALIAN] Co.); forward and reverse primers at 10 pmol/ml for HPV-16, -18 and -58 E2 or E6/7 genes; and 2 μl DNA sample. PCR reactions were as follows: 50°C for 2 min, denaturing at 95°C for 5 min, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 31 sec. Positive (corresponding plasmid) and negative (no DNA template) controls were introduced systematically in each reaction plate. Each sample was tested in duplicate. All experiments were repeated and confirmed separately by use of the Mx3000P™Real-Time PCR System (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Validation of real-time PCR for HPV load and physical status

The detection limit of the real-time PCR method was determined by using 100-fold gradient dilutions of input plasmid DNA. All typical amplification plots involved each HPV type for E2 and E6/7 plasmid DNA (change in the fluorescent signal versus cycle number). HPV-16 E6/7 plasmid DNA amplification plots are in Figure 1a: the crossing points for the real-time PCR ranged from 1010 to 1 copy for HPV-16 E6/E7 DNA (dilution factor 100) when present in amounts from 1 ng to 0.1 fg. Hence, we were able to detect HPV at amounts as low as 0.1 fg, equivalent to 1 copy. The standard curve showed a dynamic linear range for quantification across copy number over the entire range of dilution concentrations on bivariate correlation analysis (R2 = 0.9926) (Figure 1b). Similar results were obtained with amplification plots for E2 and E6/7 genes of HPV-16, -18 and -58 and the β-globin standard (data not shown).

Figure 1
figure 1

Real-time PCR for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA load and physical status assay. (a) Typical amplification plots obtained by real-time PCR for 7-point series concentration of HPV-16 E6/7 plasmid DNA. The x axis denotes the cycle number and y axis the fluorescence intensity over the background. (b) Comparison of standard curves for the crossing points plotted against the HPV-16 E2 and E6/7 concentrations. The x axis denotes the cycle number and y axis the series concentration of HPV-16 plasmid DNA. Data are mean ± SE (n = 3).

Full size image

Because HPV-16 integration often disrupts the E2 gene, recent assays measuring HPV-16 integration were based on quantification with real-time PCR of HPV-16 E6/7 relative to E2 [16]. As previous study proposed, assignment of integrated, mixed or episomal physical status of HPV DNA was calculated for each clinical specimen and determined by measuring the ratio of E2 to E6/7 [17]. The protocol for the assay for ratio of E2 to E6/7 was modified to include dual standard curves of E2 and E6/7. Table 2 shows the standards for determining the HPV-16, -18 and -58 DNA physical statuses with ratios of E2 to E6/7. Each ratio of E2 to E6/7 was calculated from the same respective template. The ratio cut-off (mean ± SE) of E2 to E6/7 loads for each HPV type were calculated by E2 and E6/7 gene amplification with use of the template made with a mixture of equivalent HPV E2 and E6/7 plasmids (range from 1010 to 1 copy) representing the episomal-form control and with the gradient dilution-constructed HPV E6/7 plasmids representing the integrated-form control. The integration form was defined by the absence of the E2 signal or ratio <0.001. Ratios between 0.001 and the lower episomal ratios indicated the mixed form (presence of both integrated and episomal forms).

Table 2 Standards to judge HPV physical status by ratio of E2 to E6/7 gene
Full size table

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded samples from the 54 additional ESCC cases were used to create a tissue microarray (TMA) block for IHC detection of HPV-16 expression. Streptavidin-peroxidase (SP) IHC staining was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions for the SP kit (Maxim.bio Co., China) and was as described previously [18]. In brief, slides were deparaffinized in xylene, and endogenous peroxidase was inactivated by immersing the slides in a 0.3% H2O2-methanol solution for 30 min at room temperature. Serum blocking solution (100 μl) was added to each section for 10-min incubation, and then anti-HPV-16 monoclonal antibody (Maxim.bio Co.) was added for 30 min. After a rinsing, SP-conjugated polymer (100 μl) was added to each section for 10 min. Sections were stained with 100 μl DAB chromogen (Maxim.bio Co.) and restained with haematoxylin for visualization of nuclei for 3 to 10 min. After a rinsing, slides were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. Paraffin sections of cervical carcinoma served as positive controls. For negative controls, primary antibodies were substituted with phosphate buffered saline instead of HPV-16 antibody.

Positive staining for IHC was as described [19] with modification. Briefly, staining for HPV-16 was mainly in cytoplasm. The immunoreactivity for all proteins was defined as follows: strongly positive (++), more than 50% of tumor cells stained; positive (+), more than 25% of the cells stained; slightly positive (±), more than 10% of the tumor cells stained; and negative (-), less than 10% of the tumor cells stained or tumor cells lacking immunoreactivity (Figure 2). All slides were observed by 2 independent pathologists in a double-blinded method, and the final concordant results were adopted.

Figure 2
figure 2

Immunohistochemistry results targeting HPV-16 in tumor samples (cancer grade I-III). The positive expression of HPV-16, indicated by brown immunohistochemistry signals, located mainly in the cytoplasm of cancer cells. A, negative (-) in cancer grade I sample; B, slightly positive (±) in cancer grade II sample; C, positive (+) in cancer grade II sample; D, strongly positive (++) in cancer grade III sample. The brown staining was by DAB and the nuclei were slightly stained by haematoxylin (original magnification × 200).

Full size image

Statistical analysis

The presence of HPV DNA among different groups was analyzed by chi-square test. HPV viral load, physical status and HPV-16 expression were analyzed by cancer type, age, lymph-node metastasis and cancer grade by independent-samples t test, one-way ANOVA, chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis assay, Mann-Whitney-U, Fisher exact test or Spearman correlation analysis as appropriate. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05 (2-sided). All analyses involved use of SPSS v16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Prevalence, viral loads and physical status of HPV-16, -18 and -58

The detection rates for total infection with HPV-16, -18 and -58 DNA in ESCC or CSCC tissue were significantly higher than those of their corresponding controls: 50.00% vs. 33.33% for ESCC, P = 0.045; and 79.48% vs. 18.52% for CSCC, P < 0.001. Patients with CSCC showed a higher total detection rate than those with ESCC (P = 0.005). HPV-16 was the most prevalent type of single infection in all groups, followed by HPV-58 and -18 (Table 3).

Table 3 HPV-16, -18 and -58 prevalence, viral load and physical status in patients with ESCC and CSCC, and in their corresponding controls
Full size table

The overall viral loads of HPV-16, -18 and -58 infection are listed in Table 3. Our data showed no significant difference in mean viral loads of HPV-16, -18 and -58 within each group. However, the combined viral load for all HR-HPVs in ESCC and CSCC patients was significantly higher than that of their corresponding controls: ESCC, 2.55 ± 3.19 vs. 0.55 ± 0.57 copies/cell (P = 0.029); and CSCC, 361.29 ± 441.75 vs. 30.87 ± 57.39 copies/cell (P < 0.001). In addition, the mean viral load of HPV-16 in CSCC patients was approximately 141.68-fold more than that in ESCC patients (468.39 ± 473.36 vs. 2.55 ± 3.19 copies/cells, P = 0.002).

In the present study, we calculated a mean ratio of E2 to E6/7 for each group to determine the degree of viral DNA integration (Table 3). Patients with CSCC showed a significantly lower mean ratio of E2 to E6/7 for HPV-16, -18 and -58 than that of normal controls (0.09 ± 0.14 vs. 0.55 ± 0.40, P < 0.001), which indicates a high prevalence of the DNA integration form of HPV in CSCC patients. However, ESCC patients and controls did not differ in mean ratio of E2 to E6/7 for HPV-16, -18 and -58 (0.20 ± 0.32 vs. 0.53 ± 0.33, P = 0.06, also see Table 3). Moreover, for CSCC patients, the mean ratios of E2 to E6/7 for HPV-16, -18 and -58 were 0.03 ± 0.08, 0.06 ± 0.10 and 0.12 ± 0.18, respectively, with no significant difference in HPV ratios (P = 0.229); similar results were found for ESCC patients and controls and CSCC controls.

Furthermore, results for HR-HPV physical status showed DNA episomal, integrated and mixed forms (Table 2). HPV DNA integration and mixed forms were more frequently observed in CSCC patients (100% [31/31]) than in controls (40.00% [4/10]) (P < 0.001). The frequency of HR-HPV integration markably increased with CSCC grade (r s = 0.575, P < 0.001). Similarly, for ESCC patients, the frequency of HR-HPV integration was higher than that for ESCC controls (r s = 0.405, P = 0.002). Overall, the mixed and integrated forms of HPV were commonly observed in ESCC patients and controls (91.43% [32/35] vs. 85.00% [17/20]).

Relationship between HPV DNA infection and clinical characteristics of patients with ESCC or CSCC

We analyzed whether the clinical and histological characteristics of patients with ESCC and CSCC were associated with HPV infection. For CSCC patients, HR-HPV loads were significantly increased and ratios of E2 to E6/7 were decreased with increased tumour grade of CSCC (P = 0.008 and P = 0.042, respectively) (Table 4). For ESCC patients, the integration level was associated with pathological grade of ESCC (P = 0.015). However, no significant associations were found between HPV physical status and patient age or lymph-node metastasis for CSCC patients. HPV viral loads were not associated with ESCC patient age, lymph-node metastasis or cancer grade (Table 4).

Table 4 Relation of viral load and ratio of E2 to E6/7 of HP-HPV infection and clinical characteristics of ESCC and CSCC patients
Full size table

Relationship between HPV-16 expression and clinical characteristics of patients with ESCC

To determine whether the expression of HPV-16 might have an influence on esophageal malignant progression, we analyzed HPV-16 expression by clinical characteristics of patients with ESCC. As shown in Table 5, HPV-16 expression was detected in 59.26% of ESCC tissues and was positively, although weakly, correlated with pathological grade of cancer and age of ESCC patients (rs = 0.301, P = 0.027; rs = 0.229, P = 0.028, respectively). No relationship was found with lymph-node metastasis.

Table 5 Correlation between HPV-16 expression and clinical characteristics of ESCC patients
Full size table

Discussion

We adopted a comprehensive methodology to assess the prevalence, viral load and physical status of infection with HR-HPV-16, -18 and -58, the 3 most common HR-HPVs, in patients with ESCC and CSCC and the expression of HPV-16 in patients with ESCC. We aimed to explore the characteristics of HR-HPV DNA in the carcinogenesis of ESCC compared with CSCC.

Infection with the 3 types of HR-HPV associated with CSCC (79.48%) in the Shantou region was consistent with that in other regions in China, but the infection in controls was higher (18.52% vs. 6.87%) [8, 20]. This increased rate should be interpreted with caution because of the small number of cases in our study. For ESCC patients, the total infection rate for all 3 viruses was greater than that of their controls. Among the HR-HPV types, HPV-16 was the most predominant in all esophageal tissues. Our results for HPV-16 and -18 infection rates in Shantou were similar to those from a previous study (52.4%) [21] and were higher than those in other regions [22, 23]. Interestingly, this distribution of HR-HPV in esophageal lesions was in agreement with observations for cervical lesions [24].

Over the past 20 years, reported HPV infection rates have varied in ESCC patients from geographically different areas [5], but are consistently high in CSCC patients [25]. This significant difference may result from HPV DNA copy numbers in host tissues. Evidence from our study revealed that the average viral load for HR-HPV for CSCC patients was significantly higher than that for ESCC patients in Shantou region; the mean viral load for HPV-16 was 2.55 ± 3.19 copies/cell in ESCC tissues. This low figure was also found in a Chinese study of EC tissues (<1 to 157 copies/cell) [13, 26] and a Finnish study of head and neck SCCs (4.6 to 49 copies/cell) [27]. Extremely low levels of HPV DNA load (even 0.01 copies/cells) in ESCC tissues may exceed the detection ability of some techniques such as regular PCR and conventional in situ hybridization (ISH), which limits detection to <10-50 copies/cell [28]. Our positive results for <10 copies of HPV DNA would be out of the detection range with use of general PCR and ISH technology. This low detection rate might explain why we failed to measure the level of HPV mRNA in our paraffin-embedded tissue by RT-PCR and the low detection rates we found with regular PCR in our previous study. This low HPV infection load was not correlated with clinical characteristics such as age, cancer grade or lymph-node metastasis of ESCC patients and their controls. However, increased levels of all HR-HPVs with increasing cancerous grade indicated a dose-dependent association of viral load and cancer grade.

Epidemiologic and molecular studies have shown that HR-HPV DNA integration is considered a prerequisite for the development of several malignant lesions [29, 30]. For the integration level of viral DNA, we found no differences between CSCC and ESCC lesions for the level of integration of HPV-16, -18 and -58; most infected CSCC or ESCC control subjects carried the episomal form of the virus, whereas the mixed and integrated forms were predominant in ESCC and invasive cervical carcinomas. For ESCC patients, specifically, we found both ratios of HPV DNA integration and expression of HPV-16 protein increased with ESCC grade. The integration occurs in the early stage of esophageal carcinogenesis and was associated with the severity of the cancer. So the increased expression of the E6 and E7 oncoproteins in ESCC might result from disrupting the E2 open reading frame when HPV integrates into the host genome [31–33]. Although the direct evidence of HPV-16 transcription and expression derived from integrated HPV DNA is still unclear, from previous studies, HPV E6- and E7-encoding cDNAs derived from integrated viral oncogene transcripts have a much stronger transforming capacity in primary cells than cDNAs derived from episome-derived transcripts [11]. The relative expression levels of the viral oncogenes and their corresponding gene products appear to be directly influenced by the sequence context of individual integration sites in cervix, head, neck, penile and tonsil carcinogenesis [34, 35]. So the potential connections among HPV DNA integration, transcription and expression, as well as its clinical value, need to be confirmed with more studies.

Our data confirmed for CSCC that the high prevalence, viral loads and integration rates of HR-HPV were the most important risk factors for cervical carcinogenesis. We also found relatively low HPV-16, -18 and -58 viral load in ESCC patients, which is consistent with the relatively low HR-HPV DNA viral load found in some cervical carcinoma cell lines such as SiHa cells (1-2 copies/cell for HPV-16) and HeLa cells (10-50 copies/cell for HPV-18). However, the low viral load, particularly with a common integrated viral genome and high expression of its onco-protein, may be sufficient to lead to or promote carcinogenesis, especially because of the high incidence of EC.

Our study contains some limitations. The selection bias cannot be avoided because of the relatively small number of samples collected, which may reduce the representativeness of our results and capacity for inference. Heterogeneity between ESCC and CSCC patient ages also existed because of the small number of samples in these groups.

Conclusions

Our data show that a relatively low HPV copy number and infection rate in ESCC is unlikely to play an essential a role in the carcinogenesis of ESCC as in cervical cancer. However, the presentation of the physical status and expression of the HR-HPV types in ESCC strongly suggests a possible role of oncogenic HPV infection in carcinogenesis of ESCC, at least for patients in the Shantou region of China. Because esophageal carcinogenesis is a complex, multi-step process, additional work is warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and the genetic changes associated with HPV infection in the development of esophageal cancer.

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005, 55 (2): 74-108. 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Su M, Liu M, Tian DP, Li XY, Zhang GH, Yang HL, Fan X, Huang HH, Gao YX: Temporal trends of esophageal cancer during 1995-2004 in Nanao Island, an extremely high-risk area in China. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007, 22 (1): 43-48. 10.1007/s10654-006-9086-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ke L, Yu P, Zhang ZX: Novel epidemiologic evidence for the association between fermented fish sauce and esophageal cancer in South China. Int J Cancer. 2002, 99 (3): 424-426. 10.1002/ijc.10293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ke L, Yu P, Zhang ZX, Huang SS, Huang G, Ma XH: Congou tea drinking and oesophageal cancer in South China. Br J Cancer. 2002, 86 (3): 346-347. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Syrjanen KJ: HPV infections and oesophageal cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002, 55 (10): 721-728. 10.1136/jcp.55.10.721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen ZY, Hu SP, Lu LC, Tang CZ, Kuang ZS, Zhong SP, Zeng Y: Detection of human papillomavirus in esophageal carcinoma. J Med Virol. 2002, 68 (3): 412-416. 10.1002/jmv.10219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shen ZY, Cen S, Xu LY, Cai WJ, Chen MH, Shen J, Zeng Y: E6/E7 genes of human papilloma virus type 18 induced immortalization of human fetal esophageal epithelium. Oncol Rep. 2003, 10 (5): 1431-1436.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bao YP, Li N, Smith JS, Qiao YL: Human papillomavirus type-distribution in the cervix of Chinese women: a meta-analysis. Int J Std Aids. 2008, 19 (2): 106-111. 10.1258/ijsa.2007.007113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tabora N, Ferrera A, Bakkers JM, Massuger LF, Melchers WJ: High HPV 16 viral load is associated with increased cervical dysplasia in Honduran women. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 78 (5): 843-846.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Briolat J, Dalstein V, Saunier M, Joseph K, Caudroy S, Pretet JL, Birembaut P, Clavel C: HPV prevalence, viral load and physical state of HPV-16 in cervical smears of patients with different grades of CIN. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121 (10): 2198-2204. 10.1002/ijc.22959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeon S, Lambert PF: Integration of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA into the human genome leads to increased stability of E6 and E7 mRNAs: implications for cervical carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92 (5): 1654-1658. 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu SS, Tsang PC, Chan KY, Cheung AN, Chan KK, Leung RC, Ngan HY: Distribution of six oncogenic types of human papillomavirus and type 16 integration analysis in Chinese women with cervical precancerous lesions and carcinomas. Tumour Biol. 2008, 29 (2): 105-113. 10.1159/000135690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Si HX, Tsao SW, Poon CS, Wong YC, Cheung AL: Physical status of HPV-16 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Virol. 2005, 32 (1): 19-23. 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.04.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruutu MP, Kulmala SM, Peitsaro P, Syrjanen SM: The performance of the HPV16 real-time PCR integration assay. Clin Biochem. 2008, 41 (6): 423-428. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.12.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Szostek S, Zawilinska B, Kopec J, Kosz-Vnenchak M: Herpesviruses as possible cofactors in HPV-16-related oncogenesis. Acta Biochim Pol. 2009, 56 (2): 337-342.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arias-Pulido H, Peyton CL, Joste NE, Vargas H, Wheeler CM: Human papillomavirus type 16 integration in cervical carcinoma in situ and in invasive cervical cancer. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44 (5): 1755-1762. 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1755-1762.2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo M, Sneige N, Silva EG, Jan YJ, Cogdell DE, Lin E, Luthra R, Zhang W: Distribution and viral load of eight oncogenic types of human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV 16 integration status in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma. Modern Pathology. 2007, 20 (2): 256-266. 10.1038/modpathol.3800737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cui L, Xu LY, Shen ZY, Tao Q, Gao SY, Lv Z, Du ZP, Fang WK, Li EM: NGALR is overexpressed and regulated by hypomethylation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14 (23): 7674-7681. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Qi ZL, Huo X, Xu XJ, Zhang B, Du MG, Yang HW, Zheng LK, Li J, Shen ZY: Relationship between HPV16/18 E6 and 53, 21WAF1, MDM2, Ki67 and cyclin D1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: comparative study by using tissue microarray technology. Exp Oncol. 2006, 28 (3): 235-240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith JS, Lindsay L, Hoots B, Keys J, Franceschi S, Winer R, Clifford GM: Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: a meta-analysis update. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121 (3): 621-632. 10.1002/ijc.22527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang X, Tian X, Liu F, Zhao Y, Sun M, Chen D, Lu C, Wang Z, Shi X, Zhang Q, Zhang D, Shen Z, Li F, Harris CC, Cai H, Ke Y: Detection of HPV DNA in esophageal cancer specimens from different regions and ethnic groups: a descriptive study. Bmc Cancer. 2010, 10 (1): 19-10.1186/1471-2407-10-19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dreilich M, Bergqvist M, Moberg M, Brattstrom D, Gustavsson I, Bergstrom S, Wanders A, Hesselius P, Wagenius G, Gyllensten U: High-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) and survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: a pilot study. Bmc Cancer. 2006, 6: 94-10.1186/1471-2407-6-94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Si HX, Tsao SW, Poon CS, Wang LD, Wong YC, Cheung AL: Viral load of HPV in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2003, 103 (4): 496-500. 10.1002/ijc.10865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beby-Defaux A, Bourgoin A, Ragot S, Battandier D, Lemasson JM, Renaud O, Bouguermouh S, Vienne MML, Agius G: Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix uteri in women attending a Health Examination Center of the French social security. J Med Virol. 2004, 73 (2): 262-268. 10.1002/jmv.20085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hildesheim A, Wang SS: H ost and viral genetics and risk of cervical cancer: a review. Virus Res. 2002, 89 (2): 229-240. 10.1016/S0168-1702(02)00191-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shuyama K, Castillo A, Aguayo F, Sun Q, Khan N, Koriyama C, Akiba S: Human papillomavirus in high- and low-risk areas of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China. Br J Cancer. 2007, 96 (10): 1554-1559. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603765.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Koskinen WJ, Chen RW, Leivo I, Mäkitie A, Bäck L, Kontio R, Suuronen R, Lindqvist C, Auvinen E, Molijn A, Quint WG, Vaheri A, Aaltonen LM: Prevalence and physical status of human papillomavirus in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Int J Cancer. 2003, 107 (3): 401-406. 10.1002/ijc.11381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zehbe I, Rylander E, Edlund K, Wadell G, Wilander E: Detection of human papillomavirus in cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia, using in situ hybridization and various polymerase chain reaction techniques. Virchows Arch. 1996, 428 (3): 151-157. 10.1007/BF00200657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Begum S, Cao D, Gillison M, Zahurak M, Westra WH: Tissue distribution of human papillomavirus 16 DNA integration in patients with tonsillar carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (16): 5694-5699. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0587.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bodaghi S, Yamanegi K, Xiao SY, Da CM, Palefsky JM, Zheng ZM: Colorectal papillomavirus infection in patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (8): 2862-2867. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lorincz AT, Castle PE, Sherman ME, Scott DR, Glass AG, Wacholder S, Rush BB, Gravitt PE, Schussler JE, Schiffman M: Viral load of human papillomavirus and risk of CIN3 or cervical cancer. Lancet. 2002, 360 (9328): 228-229. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09463-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vinokurova S, Wentzensen N, Kraus I, Klaes R, Driesch C, Melsheimer P, Kisseljov F, Durst M, Schneider A, von Knebel DM: Type-dependent integration frequency of human papillomavirus genomes in cervical lesions. Cancer Res. 2008, 68 (1): 307-313. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alazawi W, Pett M, Arch B, Scott L, Freeman T, Stanley MA, Coleman N: Changes in cervical keratinocyte gene expression associated with integration of human papillomavirus 16. Cancer Res. 2002, 62 (23): 6959-6965.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ragin CC, Reshmi SC, Gollin SM: Mapping and analysis of HPV16 integration sites in a head and neck cancer cell line. Int J Cancer. 2004, 110 (5): 701-709. 10.1002/ijc.20193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ziegert C, Wentzensen N, Vinokurova S, Kisseljov F, Einenkel J, Hoeckel M, von Knebel DM: A comprehensive analysis of HPV integration loci in anogenital lesions combining transcript and genome-based amplification techniques. Oncogene. 2003, 22 (25): 3977-3984. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported, in part, by a start-up grant from Shantou University Medical College (LC0104).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiovascular Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinling Road, Shantou, Guangdong, 515041, China

    Donghong Zhang, Leijun Huo & Yi Zhu

  2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinling Road, Shantou, Guangdong, 515041, China

    Qingying Zhang

  3. Department of Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinling Road, Shantou, Guangdong, 515041, China

    Li Zhou

  4. Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Peking University Health Sciences Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China

    Yi Zhang

  5. Institute of Oncology Pathology, Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinling Road, Shantou, Guangdong, 515041, China

    Zhongying Shen

Authors
  1. Donghong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qingying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leijun Huo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhongying Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yi Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Zhu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

DZ, LH and YZha carried out HPV detection and typing. DZ and ZS participated in HPV-16 protein detection. LZ participated in sample preparation and data validation. QZ performed the statistical analysis. DZ, ZS, and YZhu participated in study design and coordination, and prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Zhang, Q., Zhou, L. et al. Comparison of prevalence, viral load, physical status and expression of human papillomavirus-16, -18 and -58 in esophageal and cervical cancer: a case-control study. BMC Cancer 10, 650 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-650

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-650

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us