Expense and benefit of neoadjuvant treatment in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Joachim W Heise¹ , Hansjörg Heep¹ , Thomas Frieling² , Mario Sarbia³ , Karl A Hartmann⁴ and Hans-Dietrich Röher¹

¹Department of General and Trauma Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany

²Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany

³Center of Pathology Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany

⁴Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany

author email corresponding author email

BMC Cancer 2001, 1:20doi:10.1186/1471-2407-1-20


Published:	23 November 2001

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatment (NT) prior to resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) in terms of prolonged survival has not been proven by randomized trials. Facing considerable financial expenses and with concerns regarding the consumption of the patient's remaining survival time, this study aims to provide rationales for pretreating resection candidates.

Methods

From March 1986 to March 1999, patients undergoing resection for SCCE were documented prospectively. Since 1989, NT was offered to patients with mainly upper and middle third T3 or T4 tumors or T2 N1 stage who were fit for esophagectomy. Until 1993, NT consisted of chemotherapy. Since that time chemoradiation has also been applied. The parameters for expense and benefit of NT are costs, pretreatment time required, postoperative morbidity and mortality, clinical and histopathological response, and actuarial survival.

Results

Two hundred and three patients were treated, 170 by surgery alone and 33 by NT + surgery. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 52% to 30% and 12% to 6%, respectively (p = n.s.). The response to NT was detected in 23 patients (70%). In 11 instances (33%), the primary tumor lesion was histopathologically eradicated. Survival following NT + surgery was significantly prolonged in node-positive patients with a median survival of 12 months to 19 months (p = 0.0193). The average pretreatment time was 113 ± 43 days, and reimbursement for NT to the hospital amounted to Euro 9.834.

Conclusions

NT did not increase morbidity and mortality. Expenses for pretreatment, particularly time and costs, are considerable. However, taking into account that the results are derived from a non-randomized study, patients with regionally advanced tumor stages seem to benefit, as seen by their prolonged survival.