Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: An evaluation of classification systems for stillbirth

Original Submission
26 Aug 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Robson
26 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Russell Kirby
3 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Jaap H.M. Erwich
15 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Flenady
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Jaap H.M. Erwich
14 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Russell Kirby
18 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Flenady
Resubmission - Version 4
18 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
5 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Flenady
Resubmission - Version 8
5 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
11 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Flenady
Resubmission - Version 11
11 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
19 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
19 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-9-24

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page