Table 2

Factors associated with reported antenatal services during the most recent pregnancy

Proportion (%) with high score

Crude OR for high score

P value

Adjusted ORa for high score (95% confidence interval)

P value


Setting

Entebbe Hospital

127/184 (69%)

1

0.027b

1

0.026b

Other government hospitals

22/41 (54%)

0.52

0.63 (0.27, 1.47)

Private hospital

31/45 (69%)

0.99

0.86 (0.35, 2.13)

Public clinic

6/24 (25%)

0.15

0.11 (0.03, 0.44)

Traditional Birth Attendant

none

Year of pregnancy

1999

23/47 (47%)

1

<0.001c

1

<0.001c

2000

24/42 (57%)

1.52

1.37 (0.53, 3.56)

2001

22/48 (46%)

0.96

1.33 (0.50, 3.57)

2002

40/60 (67%)

2.27

2.16 (0.82, 5.70)

2003

61/75 (81%)

4.95

5.32 (2.52, 11.23)

2004 (to March)

17/22 (77%)

3.86

4.78 (1.03, 22.24)

Age

13–25 years

94/135 (70%)

1

0.041

1

0.15

25 years or more

92/159 (58%)

0.60

0.70 (0.43, 1.14)

Gravidity

Primigravida

64/94 (68%)

1

0.29

1

0.88

Multigravida

122/200 (61%)

0.73

0.95 (0.51, 1.77)

Education

None

15/28 (54%)

1

0.015c

1

0.044c

Primary

87/146 (60%)

1.28

1.14 (0.39, 3.34)

Secondary

67/98 (68%)

1.87

1.49 (0.53, 4.22)

Tertiary

17/22 (77%)

2.95

3.11 (0.99, 9.80)

Possessionsd

None of specified items/bed

122/196 (62%)

1

0.65

1

0.84

Phone/motorbike/car

64/98 (65%)

1.14

1.06 (0.62, 1.80)

Electricity at home

No

91/157 (58%)

1

0.13

1

0.32

Yes

95/137 (69%)

1.64

1.43 (0.70, 2.93)

Crowding at home

3 or more

95/146 (65%)

1

0.44

1

0.34

Less than 3 people/room

91/148 (61%)

0.86

0.81 (0.52, 1.26)


a Adjusted for anatenatal care setting, year of pregnancy, age-group, mother's education, and electricity in the home. bTest for heterogeneity. cTest for trend. dSpecified possessions were bed, mobile phone, motorcycle and car. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and P values were computed using complex survey commands within Stata (svylogit).

Tann et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2007 7:23   doi:10.1186/1471-2393-7-23

Open Data