BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

unofficial impact factor 2.09

Open Access Research article

Achieving sustainable quality in maternity services – using audit of incontinence and dyspareunia to identify shortfalls in meeting standards

James Clarkson1, Cindy Newton2, Debra Bick3, Gill Gyte4, Chris Kettle5, Mary Newburn4, Jane Radford6 and Richard Johanson5*

Author Affiliations

1 Clinical Audit, North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom

2 Clinical Audit, Queens Hospital, Burton on Trent, United Kingdom

3 Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

4 National Childbirth Trust, London, United Kingdom

5 Obstetrics & Gynaecology, North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom

6 Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Queens Hospital, Burton on Trent, United Kingdom

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2001, 1:4 doi:10.1186/1471-2393-1-4

Published: 31 October 2001

Abstract

Background

Some complications of childbirth (for example, faecal incontinence) are a source of social embarrassment for women, and are often under reported. Therefore, it was felt important to determine levels of complications (against established standards) and to consider obstetric measures aimed at reducing them.

Methods

Clinical information was collected on 1036 primiparous women delivering at North and South Staffordshire Acute and Community Trusts over a 5-month period in 1997. A questionnaire was sent to 970 women which included self-assessment of levels of incontinence and dyspareunia prior to pregnancy, at 6 weeks post delivery and 9 to 14 months post delivery.

Results

The response rate was 48%(470/970). Relatively high levels of obstetric interventions were found. In addition, the rates of instrumental deliveries differed between the two hospitals. The highest rates of postnatal symptoms had occurred at 6 weeks, but for many women problems were still present at the time of the survey. At 9–14 months high rates of dyspareunia (29%(102/347)) and urinary incontinence (35%(133/382)) were reported. Seventeen women (4%) complained of faecal incontinence at this time. Similar rates of urinary incontinence and dyspareunia were seen regardless of mode of delivery.

Conclusion

Further work should be undertaken to reduce the obstetric interventions, especially instrumental deliveries. Improvements in a number of areas of care should be undertaken, including improved patient information, improved professional communication and improved professional recognition and management of third degree tears. It is likely that these measures would lead to a reduction in incontinence and dyspareunia after childbirth.