Log on / register
Feedback | Support
Open AccessTechnical advance

The clinical meaningfulness of ADAS-Cog changes in Alzheimer's disease patients treated with donepezil in an open-label trial

Kenneth Rockwood1 email, Sherri Fay1 email, Mary Gorman1,2 email, Daniel Carver1 email and Janice E Graham3 email

1Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

2St. Martha's Regional Hospital, Antigonish, Canada

3Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

author email corresponding author email

BMC Neurology 2007, 7:26doi:10.1186/1471-2377-7-26

Published: 30 August 2007

Abstract

Background

In 6-month anti-dementia drug trials, a 4-point change in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) is held to be clinically important. We examined how this change compared with measures of clinical meaningfulness.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of a 12 month open-label study of 100 patients (71 women) diagnosed with mild to moderate AD treated with 5–10 mg of donepezil daily. We studied the observed case, 6-month change from baseline on the ADAS-Cog, the Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change-Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus), patient-Goal Attainment Scaling (PGAS) and clinician-GAS (CGAS).

Results

At 6 months, donepezil-treated patients (n = 95) were more likely to show no change (+/- 3 points) on the ADAS-Cog (56%) than to improve (20%) or decline (24%) by 4-points. ADAS-Cog change scores were little correlated with other measures: from -0.09 for PGAS to 0.27 for the CIBIC-Plus. While patients who improved on the ADAS-Cog were less likely to decline on the clinical measures (26%), 43% of patients who declined on the ADAS-Cog improved on at least two of the clinical measures.

Conclusion

The ADAS-Cog did not capture all clinically important effects. In general, ADAS-Cog improvement indicates clinical improvement, whereas many people with ADAS-Cog decline do not show clinical decline. The open-label design of this study does not allow us to know whether this is a treatment effect, which requires further investigation.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated