Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neurology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Mobilization after thrombolysis (rtPA) within 24 hours of acute stroke: what factors influence inclusion of patients in A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)?

Linnéa Muhl1, Jenny Kulin1, Marie Dagonnier23, Leonid Churilov23, Helen Dewey234, Thomas Lindén5 and Julie Bernhardt23*

Author Affiliations

1 Linköpings University, Linköping, Sweden

2 AVERT, Early Intervention Research Program, The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Austin Campus, 245 Burgundy St, Heidelberg 3084, VIC, Australia

3 The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

4 Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia

5 The Centre of Brain Research and Rehabilitation, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neurology 2014, 14:163  doi:10.1186/s12883-014-0163-6

Published: 27 August 2014

Abstract

Background

A key treatment for acute ischaemic stroke is thrombolysis (rtPA). However, treatment is not devoid of side effects and patients are carefully selected. AVERT (A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial), a large, ongoing international phase III trial, tests whether starting out of bed activity within 24 hours of stroke onset improves outcome. Patients treated with rtPA can be recruited if the physician allows (447 included to date). This study aimed to identify factors that might influence the inclusion of rtPA treated patients in AVERT.

Methods

Data from all patients thrombolysed at Austin Health, Australia, between September 2007 and December 2011 were retrospectively extracted from medical records. Factors of interest included: demographic and stroke characteristics, 24 hour clinical response to rtPA treatment, cerebral imaging and process factors (day and time of admission).

Results

211 patients received rtPA at Austin Health and 50 (24%) were recruited to AVERT (AVERT). Of the 161 patients not recruited, 105 (65%) were eligible, and could potentially have been included (pot-AVERT). There were no significant differences in demographics, Oxfordshire classification or stroke severity (NIHSS) on admission between groups. Size and localization of stroke on imaging and symptomatic intracerebral heamorrhage rate did not differ. Patients included in AVERT showed less change in NIHSS 24 hours post rtPA (median change = 1, IQR (−1,4)) than those in the pot-AVERT group (median change = 3, IQR (0,6)) by the median difference of 2 points (95%CI:0.3; p = 0.03). A higher proportion of rtPA treated AVERT patients were admitted on weekdays (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Excluding a possible clinical instability, no significant clinical differences were identified between thrombolysed patients included in AVERT and those who were not. Over 500 AVERT patients will be treated with rtPA at trial end. These results suggest we may be able to generalize findings to other rtPA treated patients beyond the trial population.

Keywords:
Stroke; Very early mobilization; Post-stroke complications; Recombinant tissue plasminogen