Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Nephrology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Choosing to live with home dialysis-patients' experiences and potential for telemedicine support: a qualitative study

Ellen Rygh1*, Eli Arild1, Elin Johnsen1 and Markus Rumpsfeld2

Author Affiliations

1 Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, University Hospital of North Norway, PO Box 35, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway

2 Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, PO Box 100, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Nephrology 2012, 13:13  doi:10.1186/1471-2369-13-13

Published: 19 March 2012

Abstract

Background

This study examines the patients' need for information and guidance in the selection of dialysis modality, and in establishing and practicing home dialysis. The study focuses on patients' experiences living with home dialysis, how they master the treatment, and their views on how to optimize communication with health services and the potential of telemedicine.

Methods

We used an inductive research strategy and conducted semi-structured interviews with eleven patients established in home dialysis. Our focus was the patients' experiences with home dialysis, and our theoretical reference was patients' empowerment through telemedicine solutions. Three informants had home haemodialysis (HHD); eight had peritoneal dialysis (PD), of which three had automated peritoneal dialysis (APD); and five had continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The material comprises all PD-patients in the catchment area capable of being interviewed, and all known HHD-users in Norway at that time.

Results

All of the interviewees were satisfied with their choice of home dialysis, and many experienced a normalization of daily life, less dominated by disease. They exhibited considerable self-management skills and did not perceive themselves as ill, but still required very close contact with the hospital staff for communication and follow-up. When choosing a dialysis modality, other patients' experiences were often more influential than advice from specialists. Information concerning the possibility of having HHD, including knowledge of how to access it, was not easily available. Especially those with dialysis machines, both APD and HHD, saw a potential for telemedicine solutions.

Conclusions

As home dialysis may contribute to a normalization of life less dominated by disease, the treatment should be organized so that the potential for home dialysis can be fully exploited. Pre-dialysis information should be unbiased and include access to other patients' experiences. Telemedicine may potentially facilitate a communication-based follow-up and improve safety within the home setting, making it easier to choose and live with home dialysis.

Keywords:
Home dialysis; Modality selection; Fellow patients; Telemedicine; Chronic care model; Patient empowerment; Self-management