Computer-assisted assessment of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 immunohistochemical assay in imaged histologic sections using a membrane isolation algorithm and quantitative analysis of positive controls1 Graduate School for the Biomedical Sciences, UMDNJ, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA 2 Center for Biomedical Imaging and Informatics, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA 3 The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA 4 Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, UMDNJ, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, UMDNJ, 1 Robert Wood Johnson Place, New Brunswick , New Jersey, USA 6 Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, UMDNJ, 1 Robert Wood Johnson Place, New Brunswick , New Jersey, USA
BMC Medical Imaging 2008, 8:11doi:10.1186/1471-2342-8-11
Additional filesAdditional file 1: Selecting the optimal threshold for membrane pixels. Although lower thresholds can produce visually more satisfying membrane isolation results for weaker staining cases (especially IHC = 1+), responses greater than 15 produced the greatest area under the ROC curve using the Mn feature, and thus the k = 15 threshold was selected to produce the results in these experiments. Format: TIFF Size: 690KB Download file Additional file 2: Membrane Isolation Algorithm results using both high and low thresholds. These are the results from the membrane isolation algorithm using 2 different thresholds k = 15, and k = 5. These are specimens which stained less intensely. Format: PDF Size: 244KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader Additional file 3: ROC curves using Membrane Isolation Algorithm based on k = 15 and a combination (k = 15, k = 5). This is a comparison of ROC curves based on different Membrane Isolation Algorithm (MIA) variations. Since lighter cases showed enhanced membrane isolation detection when lower thresholds were used, a MIA using k = 5 threshold for lighter images and k = 15 for darker images was evaluated (green line). However, this did not improve AUC in comparison to one universal threshold (black line), and consequently, only one threshold (k = 15) was used in the results of this manuscript. It is interesting to note that the combination threshold used had very similar results to manual scoring (blue line). Format: PDF Size: 10KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader |




on Google Scholar







author email
corresponding author email