Table 1

Comparison of contour errors
Authors Technique Inner contour Outer contour
error [mm] error [mm]
Our method CRF 1.57 1.78
Our method (without subjects 8 and 27) CRF 1.49 1.74
Andreopoulos and Tsotsos [9] AAM 1.43 1.51
Üzümcü [23] Landmark tracking 1.86 1.77
Jolly [14] Shortest path 2.44 2.05
Cordero-Grande et al. [13] Edge MRF 1.37 1.22
Lorenzo-Valdés et al. [24] Surface MRF 2.99 2.21

Average segmentations errors as reported by different authors. These results are not strictly comparable since they are based on different datasets and the error criteria differ. Refer to the individual papers for more detail.

Dreijer et al.

Dreijer et al. BMC Medical Imaging 2013 13:24   doi:10.1186/1471-2342-13-24

Open Data