Improved assessment of multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation agreement via detection and outline error estimates
1 Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Dept. of Neurology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
3 Department of Neuroradiology, IRCCS, C. Mondino, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
4 The Jacobs Neurological Institute, Dept. of Neurology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
5 Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs Neurological Institute, State University of NY at Buffalo, 100 High St., Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
BMC Medical Imaging 2012, 12:17 doi:10.1186/1471-2342-12-17Published: 19 July 2012
Presented is the method “Detection and Outline Error Estimates” (DOEE) for assessing rater agreement in the delineation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. The DOEE method divides operator or rater assessment into two parts: 1) Detection Error (DE) -- rater agreement in detecting the same regions to mark, and 2) Outline Error (OE) -- agreement of the raters in outlining of the same lesion.
DE, OE and Similarity Index (SI) values were calculated for two raters tested on a set of 17 fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) images of patients with MS. DE, OE, and SI values were tested for dependence with mean total area (MTA) of the raters' Region of Interests (ROIs).
When correlated with MTA, neither DE (ρ = .056, p=.83) nor the ratio of OE to MTA (ρ = .23, p=.37), referred to as Outline Error Rate (OER), exhibited significant correlation. In contrast, SI is found to be strongly correlated with MTA (ρ = .75, p < .001). Furthermore, DE and OER values can be used to model the variation in SI with MTA.
The DE and OER indices are proposed as a better method than SI for comparing rater agreement of ROIs, which also provide specific information for raters to improve their agreement.