Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Infectious Diseases and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Combined use of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism and IS6110-RFLP in fingerprinting clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Kerala, South India

Manju Y Krishnan, Indulakshmi Radhakrishnan, Biljo V Joseph, Madhavi Latha GK, Ajay Kumar R and Sathish Mundayoor*

Author Affiliations

Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram- 695 014, Kerala, India

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Infectious Diseases 2007, 7:86  doi:10.1186/1471-2334-7-86

Published: 28 July 2007

Abstract

Background

DNA fingerprinting by IS6110-RFLP has shown a high incidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates having no and low copies of the insertion sequence in Kerala, South India. Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) would scan the entire genome rather than a few repetitive elements, we thought that this technique would help us in differentiating the large reservoir of isolates from an endemic region. Here we evaluate the ability of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) to type clinical isolates.

Methods

Fifty clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were analysed by conventional radioactive AFLP and IS6110- RFLP. M. bovis, M. bovis BCG and two non tuberculous mycobacteria were also analysed to see species specific differences generated by AFLP. Cluster analysis was performed using the AFLP profile that showed the maximum polymorphism within M. tuberculosis and this was compared to the number of copies of IS6110 insertions.

Results

For AFLP, out of ten primer pairs tested, the EO/MC pair generated maximum polymorphism among the clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis. The similarity between the isolates ranged between 88 and 99.5%. Majority (nearly 85%) of the 'low copy' IS6110 isolates clustered together, while the rest clustered irrespective of the copy numbers. AFLP could show rare differences between isolates of M. tuberculosis, M. bovis and M. bovis BCG. The AFLP profiles for non-tuberculous mycobacteria were highly different from those of M. tuberculosis.

Conclusion

Polymorphism generated by AFLP within the M. tuberculosis species is limited and hence AFLP alone seems to have limited use in fingerprinting the isolates in Kerala. The combined use of AFLP and IS6110-RFLP showed relatively better differentiation of 'high copy' IS6110 isolates, but failed to differentiate the 'low copy' isolates. However, the technique may be efficient in inter-species differentiation, and hence potentially useful in identifying and developing species- specific markers.