Skip to main content
Download PDF

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusprevalence: Current susceptibility patterns in Trinidad

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 6, Article number: 83 (2006) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become one of the most widespread causes of nosocomial infections worldwide. Recently, reports have emerged that S. aureus strains recovered from community-acquired infections are also methicillin-resistant. This study was undertaken to analyze the prevalence of methicillin resistance among isolates at a regional hospital in Trinidad, and document the current resistance profile of MRSA and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) to the commonly used anti-staphylococcal agents.

Methods

Over a 6-year period we analyzed 2430 isolates of S. aureus strains recovered from various clinical sources, from hospital and community practices. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done according to guideline recommendations of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

Results

The prevalence of MRSA from surgical/burn wounds, urine and pus/abscess were 60.1%, 15.5% and 6.6%, respectively. The major sources of MSSA were surgical/burn wounds, pus/abscess and upper respiratory tract specimens with rates of 32.9%, 17.1% and 14.3%, respectively. The greatest prevalence of resistance of MRSA was seen for erythromycin (86.7%), and clindamycin (75.3%). Resistance rates among MSSA were highest for ampicillin (70%). Resistance rates for tetracycline were similar among both MRSA (78.7%) and MSSA (73.5%). The MRSA recovery rates from nosocomial sources (20.8%) was significantly higher than that of previous years (12.5%) (p < 0.001), whereas rates among community isolates were relatively similar for the same period (4.1% versus 8.1%).

Conclusion

The prevalence of MRSA in the hospital increased from 12.5% in 1999 to 20.8% in 2004. Most isolates were associated with infected surgical/burn wounds which may have become infected via the hands of HCPs during dressing exercises. Infection control measures aimed at the proper hand hygiene procedures may interrupt the spread of MRSA. HCPs may also be carriers of MRSA in their anterior nares. Surveillance cultures of both patients and HCPs may help to identify carriers who would be offered antibiotics to eradicate the organisms. Most MRSA are resistant to several non-β-lactam antibiotics. Frequent monitoring of susceptibility patterns of MRSA and the formulation of a definite antibiotic policy maybe helpful in decreasing the incidence of MRSA infection.

Peer Review reports

Background

Staphylococcus aureus remains one of the most frequently isolated pathogens in both community and hospital practices. The organism has been found to be the most common bacterial agent recovered from blood stream infections, skin and soft tissue infections, pneumonia and hospital-acquired post-operative wound infections [1–4]. If untreated, staphylococcal infections may lead to bacteremic seedings of several organs, causing endocarditis, osteomyelitis and septic arthritis [5, 6]. Changes in the pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility of S. aureus and other organisms have been reported world wide, especially in developing countries [7–9], making antimicrobial agents increasingly less effective in treating bacterial infections.

Over the past twelve years there have been dramatic changes in the susceptibility of S. aureus in both hospitals and community settings in Trinidad [10–12]. The older β-lactams, penicillin and ampicillin are ineffective against more than 80 % of isolated strains, and resistance to many of the non-β-lactam agents such as the tetracyclines, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin and clindamycin has gradually increased and reached alarming levels by the 1990s in many parts of the world [13–15].

Several mechanisms for the methicillin resistance seen in S. aureus have been elucidated. The most important is the production of a unique penicillin-binding protein (PBP) that has a low affinity for β-lactam antibiotics and whose effects are determined by several structural genes (mec, mec RI, mec I) [16, 17]. Other known mechanisms of methicillin resistance are the production of the usual PBPs, but with modified affinities for the β-lactam drugs, and the hyper production of penicillinase enzyme [17, 18].

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains can easily spread from infected patients to medical staffs, who often become transient carriers [19]. Because MRSA, are usually also resistant to other non-β-lactam antibiotics, infections with them are life-threatening in immunocompromised patients, often difficult to manage, and problematic to eradicate. The primary importance is to decrease the prevalence of MRSA by measures such as rapid and reliable identification of the organisms along with their susceptibility patterns to other antibiotics, isolation and treatment of patients and carriers, and strict adherence to proper hand washing practices by health care providers.

The purpose of this study was to review and document: (1) the current prevalence of methicillin resistance among isolates of S. aureus recovered from hospital and community sources and (2), the pattern of antimicrobial susceptibilities of MSSA and MRSA isolates to the commonly prescribed antibiotics in Trinidad.

Methods

Between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2004, we examined strains of S. aureus recovered from various clinical sources from both hospital and community practices in Trinidad, which had complete susceptibility data. Specimens were derived from patients on the wards and from those attending outpatients' clinics at the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex (EWMSC). The EWMSC is a 560-bed semi-private medical facility located in the northwest part of the country. Trinidad is the larger of the twin-island Republic, Trinidad and Tobago, located about 11 km off the northern coast of Venezuela in South America. The population of the Republic is about 1.3 million. For this investigation, no differentiation was between isolates from inpatients and outpatients, all being classified as "hospital practice" isolates. S. aureus recovered from patients attending health centers in the community and those seen by general practitioners were classified as "community practice" isolates. For purposes of gathering infection control surveillance data, other organisms and duplicates of clinically significant isolates were excluded from the study.

S. aureus isolates were identified via colonial morphology on blood agar plates supplemented with 5% sheep blood, gram stain characteristics, catalase test, tube coagulase test, mannitol fermentation and DNAse test. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done on Mueller-Hinton agar (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Maryland, USA) using the disc diffusion technique as outlined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [20]. The following drugs and concentrations (in brackets) were used to determine the antibiogram of the strains: ampicillin (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) (1.25/23.75 μg), ciprofloxacin 5 μg), clindamycin (2 μg) and vancomycin (30 μg). Methicillin-resistance was tested using a 1 μg oxacillin disc. Zone diameters were read after incubation at 35°C for a full 24 hr. Strains with zone sizes of < 10 mm for oxacillin was regarded as methicillin resistant. ATCC S. aureus strains 25923 and 29213 were used as quality control. Statistical analysis of data was done using X2 test with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 9.0.

Results

During the six-year study period, a total of 2430 S. aureus isolates were recorded. The major sources of S. aureus were from surgical and burn wounds, pus/abscess, upper respiratory tract and urine which together, accounted for 1805 (74.3%) of all isolates (Table 1). One hundred and nine S. aureus strains (4.5%) were from patients with pneumonia, 201 (8.3%) from the blood of patients with sepsis and 95 (4.0%) from patients with eye infections. The rest of the isolates were from vaginal, ear, CNS and miscellaneous infections, each accounting for < 3.0% of the total. The major source of MRSA was surgical/burn wounds (60.1%) followed by urine (15.5%), pus/abscess (6.6%) and blood (6.2%). MSSA was recovered more frequently from surgical/burn wounds (32.9%), pus/abscess (17.1%) and the upper respiratory tract (14.3%).

Table 1 Clinical sources 2430 strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated at the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, 1999 – 2004
Full size table

The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of MSSA isolates are shown in Table 2. Throughout the study period resistance to the older β-lactam antibiotics increased significantly (p < 0.001) in both hospital and community practices. Resistance patterns of erythromycin, co-trimoxazole, gentamicin and clindamycin were higher among hospital isolates when compared to community isolates, but these differences (except for gentamicin) were not statistically significant. The reverse situation was seen among community strains versus hospital strains where resistance rates were considerably higher for ciprofloxacin.

Table 2 Percentage of 1979 aMSSA strains resistant to various antimicrobial agents at the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, 1999 – 2004
Full size table

All MRSA isolates were fully sensitive to vancomycin, while the greatest prevalence of resistance was seen for erythromycin (86.7%) followed by clindamycin (75.3%), tetracycline (78.7%) and ciprofloxacin (59.1%). The remaining isolates had varying degrees of resistance which accounted for < 45%. Comparison of non-β-lactam resistant MRSA of the current study with a previous study is shown in Table 3. Resistance rates to erythromycin and ciprofloxacin were significantly higher when compared to the 1999 study (p < 0.001). Conversely, there were significant improvements in susceptibility among MRSA strains to tetracycline, gentamicin and co-trimoxazole when compared to the 1999 report [21]. This observation is encouraging since these drugs are among the cheapest on the hospital formulary. Interestingly, these drugs are also infrequently used (except gentamicin) on the wards (unpublished data). However, these statistical comparisons may not have been valid if the number of isolates for both studies were similar. The ratio of MRSA in the present study when compared with the previous study was approximately 10:1. The overall methicillin-resistance rate was 18.6%. Among hospital strains of MRSA, the rate of isolation was 20.8%, whereas, the prevalence of resistance among community isolates was 8.1% (Table 4).

Table 3 Comparison of the current resistance patterns of aMRSA with a previous study at the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex
Full size table
Table 4 Distribution of 2430 Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from hospital practice and community practice at the Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, according to methicillin-resistance, 1999 – 2004.
Full size table

Discussion

The present study has shown a steady increase in the prevalence rate of MRSA isolation (18.6%) over the previous study of 9.8%. Similar patterns have been seen worldwide as evident from the many recorded surveillance studies [3, 4, 18]. Despite this observation however; there are considerable differences between individual countries [22]. The highest rates of methicillin resistance among S. aureus were observed among isolates from the western Pacific region [15]. In Korea, the rate was 64 % [22], in a major Taiwanese hospital resistance rate was found to be about 77% [23]. In North America [4, 24, 25], the Middle East [7, 9, 13, 26], India [27] and the Canary Islands [28] rates of 38 – 50%, 33–40%, 18 – 43% and 25% respectively, have been reported. MRSA rates from the Caribbean are scanty, but data from a previous report [21], Jamaica [29], Cuba [30] and a French territory island [31] have shown rates of isolation to be < 10%. From South America [4, 32–34] and Europe [18, 35, 36], rates of 10 – 66% and 25 – 58% respectively, have been seen. These different rates among MRSAs from different countries maybe attributed to variations in patient populations, the biological characteristics of the S. aureus strains, and/or infection control practices.

The current study showed that the epidemiology of MRSA at this institution has changed. Although MRSA remains largely a nosocomial pathogen, 8.1% of isolates were community-acquired. Several factors maybe at play in the increasing prevalence of community-acquired MRSA. One reason for this increase maybe lateral dissemination of MRSA from hospital to the community from discharged patients diagnosed with MRSA, and the discontinuation of therapy because of the high cost of prescribed drugs at local pharmacies. These strains of MRSA are frequently multi-resistant. Two reports from Australia suggests that while lateral dissemination from hospital to community may be a major factor, strains of MRSA isolated from people in a remote western area of the country shows no similarity to hospital-derived strains. These people have had little or no contact with urban cities, health care facilities or health care providers, and these MRSA are generally non-multi-resistant [37, 38]. The authors used multi-locus sequence typing and protein A gene typing, as well as susceptibility profiles in evaluating relatedness of the community-acquired MRSA strains. Although molecular techniques were not applied in this study, the multi-resistance as seen among community strains would suggest that these strains may have originated from the hospital.

The methicillin resistance rate of 20.8% as seen among hospital isolates was considerable higher than the 1999 rate of 12.5%. Community MRSA prevalence remained relatively stable over the past 6 years (4.1% in 1999 to 8.1% in 2004), but this was not statistically significant. These increases as seen in the study are certainly a cause for concern in Trinidad and may very well represent a trend in the changing epidemiology of MRSA in the 2000s. Although a protocol exists for the management of infected patients and colonized health care providers (HCPs), it is rarely implemented. The protocol requires the physical separation of infected patients and their HCPs from uninfected patients, therapy for eradicating MRSA, stringent environmental disinfection of areas harboring MRSA and the application of barrier isolation precaution measures, including strictly enforced hand hygiene to interrupt spread patterns. A previous report from this country revealed that proper hand washing practices and sanitation techniques of HCPs at all levels of service were not strictly adhered to [39]. The situation is further complicated by the fact that HCPs frequently complain of overcrowded wards, scarce material resources and overworked personnel.

Conclusion

The study has shown that the prevalence of MRSA infections has increased over the years. The principal source may have been the hands of HCPs during wound dressing exercises. Infection control measures such as proper hand hygiene and surveillance cultures may help in arresting the spread of MRSA in the hospital setting. An antibiotic policy and the monitoring of susceptibility patterns of MRSA may also help in decreasing the prevalence of MRSA and antibiotic resistance.

References

  1. Giacometi A, Cirioni O, Schimizzi AM, Del Prete MS, Barchiesi F, D'errico MM, Petrelli E, Scalise G: Epidemiology and Microbiology of surgical wound infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 918-922.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doern GV, Jones RN, Pfaller MA, Kugler KC, Beach ML: Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 1997). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999, 34: 65-72. 10.1016/S0732-8893(98)00162-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sader HS, Jones RN, Gales AC, Winokun P, Kugler KC, Pfaller MA, Doern GV: Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns for pathogens isolated from patients in Latin American medical centers with a diagnosis of pneumonia: analysis of results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998, 32: 289-301. 10.1016/S0732-8893(98)00124-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Sader HS, Kugler KC, Beach ML: Survey of bloodstream infections attributable to gram positive cocci: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in 1997 in the United States, Canada and Latin America from the Sentry. Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999, 33: 238-297.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lowy F: Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med. 1998, 339: 520-532. 10.1056/NEJM199808203390806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laupland KB, Church DL, Mucenski M, Sutherland LR, Davies HD: Population-based study of the epidemiology of and the risk factors for invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections. J Infect Dis. 2003, 187: 1452-1459. 10.1086/374621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bukhari MH, Iqbal A, Khatoon N, Iqbal N, Naeem S, Qureshi GR: A laboratory study of susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pak J Med Sci. 2004, 20: 229-233.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krishna BV, Patil AB, Chandrasekhar MR: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a south Indian city. Southeastern Asian J Trop Med Pub Health. 2004, 35: 371-374.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alborzi A, Pourabbas Ba, Salehi H, Pourabbas Bh, Oboodi B, Panjehshahin MR: Prevalence and patterns of antibiotic sensitivity of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Shiraz-Iran. Irn J Med Sci. 2000, 25 (1&2): 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orrett FA: Antimicrobial resistance in Trinidad: hospital practice strains versus community practice strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Med Sci Res. 1997, 25: 663-666.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Orrett FA: Antimicrobial sensitivity patterns of aerobic bacterial blood isolates: experience at a university hospital in Trinidad. Intl J Antimicrobial Agents. 2001, 17 (1): 75-77. 10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00313-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Adesiyiun AA, Prabhakar P, Ali C, Lewis M: Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from clinical and non-clinical human sources in Trinidad: susceptibility to bacteriophages and antimicrobial agents, and toxigenicity. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1995, 282: 519-532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mansouri S, Khaleghi M: Antibacterial resistance patterns and frequency of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from different sources in Southeastern Iran. Irn J Med Sci. 1997, 22 (2&3): 93-96.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kunin CM: Resistance to antimicrobial drugs: a worldwide calamity. Ann Intern Med. 1993, 118: 557-561.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bell JM, Turnidge JD, SENTRY APAC Participants: High prevalence of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospital patients in Asia-Pacific and South Africa: Results from SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1998 – 1999. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46: 879-881. 10.1128/AAC.46.3.880-882.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hackbarth CJ, Chambers HF: Methicillin-resistant staphylococci: Genetics and mechanisms of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989, 33: 995-999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomasz A, Drugeon HB, de Lancester HM: New mechanism for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus : Clinical isolates that lack the PBP – 2a gene and contain normal penicillin-binding protein with modified penicillin-binding capacity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989, 33: 1869-1874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fruit AC, Wielders CLC, Verhoef J, Schmitz FL: Epidemiology and susceptibility of 3051 Staphylococcus aureus isolated from 25 university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY Study. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 3727-2732. 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3727-3732.2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cookson B, Peters B, Webster M, Phillips I, Rahman M, Noble W: Staff carriage of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1989, 27: 1471-1476.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. Approved Standards: M2-A7 and Supplemental Tables. M 100 S 10(M2). 2000, Wayne, PA, 7

  21. Orrett FA: Methicillin-resistance among Trinidadian isolates of community and hospital strains of Staphylococcus aureus and their patterns of resistance to non-β-lactam antibiotics. Jpn J Infect Dis. 1999, 52: 238-241.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bin Kim H, Hee-Chang J, Jung Nam H, Seon Lee Y, Su Kim B, Beom Park W, Deok , Lee K: Invitro activities of 28 antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus isolates from tertiary-care hospitals in Korea: a nationwide study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 1124-1127. 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1124-1127.2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsueh P-R, Teng LJ, Chen W-H, Pan H-J, Chen ML, Chang S-C, Luh K-T, Lin F-Y: Increasing prevalence of MRSA causing Nosocomial infections at a university hospital in Taiwan from 1986 to 2001. Antimicrobiol Agent Chemother. 2004, 48: 1361-1364. 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1361-1364.2004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuehnert MJ, Hill HA, Kupronis BA, Tokars JI, Solomon SL, Jernigan BD: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospitalization, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 868-872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones ME, Draghi DC, Karlowsky JA, Sahm DF, Bradley JS: Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from central nervous system specimens as reported by U.S. hospital laboratories from 2000 to 2002. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrobials. 2004, 3: 3-11. 10.1186/1476-0711-3-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanumanthappa AR, Chandrappa NR, Rajasekharappa MG: Prevalence of methicilli-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Karnataka. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2003, 46: 129-132.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Montesinos I, Salido E, Delgado T, Lecuona M, Sierra A: Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a university hospital in the Canary Islands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003, 24: 667-672. 10.1086/502276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bodonaik NC, King SD, Narla VR: Antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus at the university hospital the West Indies. West Indian Med J. 1984, 8-13. 1

  29. Torano G, Quinones D, Hernandez I, Hernandez T, Tomargo I, Borroto S: Nasal carriers of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Cuban children attending day-care centers. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2001, 19 (8): 367-370. [Englist abstract – PubMed]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lelièvre H, Lina G, Jones ME, Olive C, Forey F, Roussel-Delvallez M, Nicholas-Chanoine M-H, Bèbèar CM, Jarlier V, Andremont A, Vandenesch F, Etienne J: Emergence and spread in French hospitals of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with increasing susceptibility to gentamicin and other antibiotics. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 3452-3457.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Egido JM, Barros ML: Preliminary study of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infection in Manaus hospital, Amazonia Region, Brazil. Revisita de Soc de Med Trop. 2003, 36: 707-709.

    Google Scholar 

  32. de Oliveira Canterno L, Wey SB, Castelo A: Staphylococcus bacteremia: comparison of two periods and a predictive model of mortality. Braz J Infect Dis. 2002, 6 (6): 288-297.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Loureiro MM, de Morales BA, Quadra MRR, Pinheiro GS, Suffys PN, Asensi MD: Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from newborns in a hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000, 95: 777-782. 10.1590/S0074-02762000000600005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Topeli A, Unal S, Akalin HE: Risk factors influencing clinical outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a Turkish university hospital. Int J Antimicrobiol Agents. 2000, 14: 57-63. 10.1016/S0924-8579(99)00147-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Blanc DS, Pitter D, Ruef C, Widmer AF, Muhlemann K, Petignat C, Harbarth S: Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: results of a nation-wide survey in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2002, 132: 223-229.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Salgado CD, Farr BM, Calfee DP: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus : a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk ractors. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 36: 131-139. 10.1086/345436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. O'Brien FG, Lim TT, Chong FN, Coombs GW, Enright MC, Robinson DA, Monk A: Diversity among community isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Australia. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 3185-3190. 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3185-3190.2004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Orrett FA, Brooks PJ, Richardson EG: Nosocomial infections in a rural regional in a developing country: infection rates by site, service, cost and infection control practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998, 19: 136-140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the microbiology laboratory for compiling the data, and without whom, this study would not be possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Eric Williams Medical Sciences, Complex Champs Fleurs, West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago

    Fitzroy A Orrett

  2. Department of Biological, Sciences, Northwestern State University, Natchitoches, LA, 71497, USA

    Michael Land

Authors
  1. Fitzroy A Orrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Land
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fitzroy A Orrett.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FAO planned the study, collected the data, analyzed the data, compiled the results and wrote the manuscript. ML helped in planning the study, analyzing the culture and susceptibility data and the statistical analysis.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orrett, F.A., Land, M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusprevalence: Current susceptibility patterns in Trinidad. BMC Infect Dis 6, 83 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-83

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-83

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us