Skip to main content
Download PDF

A multiplex nested PCR for the detection and identification of Candida species in blood samples of critically ill paediatric patients

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 14, Article number: 406 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nosocomial candidaemia is associated with high mortality rates in critically ill paediatric patients; thus, the early detection and identification of the infectious agent is crucial for successful medical intervention. The PCR-based techniques have significantly increased the detection of Candida species in bloodstream infections. In this study, a multiplex nested PCR approach was developed for candidaemia detection in neonatal and paediatric intensive care patients.

Methods

DNA samples from the blood of 54 neonates and children hospitalised in intensive care units with suspected candidaemia were evaluated by multiplex nested PCR with specific primers designed to identify seven Candida species, and the results were compared with those obtained from blood cultures.

Results

The multiplex nested PCR had a detection limit of four Candida genomes/mL of blood for all Candida species. Blood cultures were positive in 14.8% of patients, whereas the multiplex nested PCR was positive in 24.0% of patients, including all culture-positive patients. The results obtained with the molecular technique were available within 24 hours, and the assay was able to identify Candida species with 100% of concordance with blood cultures. Additionally, the multiplex nested PCR detected dual candidaemia in three patients.

Conclusions

Our proposed PCR method may represent an effective tool for the detection and identification of Candida species in the context of candidaemia diagnosis in children, showing highly sensitive detection and the ability to identify the major species involved in this infection.

Peer Review reports

Background

Candida is the main etiological agent of nosocomial opportunistic mycoses worldwide and is associated with high mortality rates, especially in patients with underlying diseases [1, 2]. Candida species are the third most common pathogen isolated from bloodstream infections of preterm infants and the fourth most common pathogen in paediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patients [3–5]. The incidence of invasive candidiasis among critically ill paediatric patients has increased during the last two decades, and the outcome of Candida infections is particularly poor in very low birth weight infants due to central nervous system involvement, leading to neurodevelopmental impairment [6].

Candida albicans is the most frequent cause of candidaemia in paediatric patients, followed by C. parapsilosis in neonates. Candida tropicalis has been frequently reported in bloodstream infections of neonates and children in Latin America and some regions of southern Asia [7, 8].

Some groups of paediatric patients are especially predisposed to candidaemia, including preterm infants, children with haematological malignancies, stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients, children requiring a prolonged hospital stay in the ICU, and children undergoing medium or large surgeries. There are also risk factors associated with candidaemia, such as the use of central venous or arterial catheters, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and parenteral nutrition [3, 5].

The gold standard of laboratory diagnosis remains the isolation of Candida species by blood culture. However, the sensitivity of blood cultures is approximately 50%, and the collection of small blood volumes in neonates and young children further decreases this sensitivity [9]. In addition, a time period of 48 to 96 hours is required for the identification of Candida species by blood culture [10]; thus, faster detection of Candida spp. in the blood would expedite the initiation of treatment, improving the prognosis of patients [11]. In an attempt to shorten the time required for detection of candidaemia, several groups have developed non-culture methods based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which has proved to be highly sensitive and specific for the detection of Candida DNA in the blood samples of at-risk patients [12, 13]. In addition, multiplex PCR designed to detect different targets simultaneously is time-saving and more cost-effective than the standard PCR [10, 14].

This study aimed to develop a multiplex nested PCR method to detect and identify seven Candida species in peripheral blood samples of critically ill paediatric patients presenting with predisposing conditions/risk factors for the development of candidaemia. The results of PCR were compared with those of blood cultures.

Methods

Patients and blood samples

This research was approved by the human research ethics committee of our institutions [Comissão de Ética para Análise de Projetos de Pesquisa do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil and Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da FAMERP, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil].

This prospective study enrolled 54 consecutive paediatric patients, among whom there were 24 neonates, admitted to the ICU of two paediatric referral hospitals in São Paulo State, Brazil. The patients presented with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) according to the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus [15] and at least two predisposing conditions/risk factors for the development of candidaemia.

The control group included 28 children from the Pediatric Surgery Division of the Instituto da Criança – HCFMUSP that had no evidence of any type of bloodstream infection and had undergone minor surgical procedures during the same time. The number of studied cases and controls was determined based on the 18-month period set for the completion of the research (convenience sample).

Although all the patients had central catheters, blood samples for use in cultures and multiplex nested PCR were collected from a peripheral vein after written consent was obtained from parents or legal guardians.

Blood cultures and phenotypic identification of Candidaisolates

Cultures were obtained aseptically by inoculating 1-2 mL of blood samples into Bactec Peds Plus/F bottles (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), which were incubated in a Bactec™ 9240 analyser (Becton Dickinson). The organisms obtained from positive cultures were identified using the Vitek ®2 system (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France). Blood cultures were not performed for members of the control group due to the absence of a clinical indication for this exam.

DNA extractions and PCR to amplify the β-actin gene

DNA extractions were performed according to the techniques described by Löeffler et al. [16] with modifications. Briefly, 10 mL of blood lysis solution was added to 1-2 mL of blood sample, and the mixture was centrifuged for 15 minutes at 2190 × g. Nucleo lysis solution (1 mL) was added to the cell pellet, and the solutions were homogenised. Recombinant lyticase (L-2524, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 250 U/mL and 2% β-mercaptoethanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were added, and the tubes were maintained at 37°C for 2 hours. The tubes were then centrifuged for 20 minutes at 15,300 × g and the supernatant was transferred to clean tubes. The remaining steps were performed with the QIAamp DNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the 54 DNA samples were amplified using a pair of human β-actin gene primers to ensure the integrity of the DNA and the absence of amplification inhibitors.

Candidaprototype strains

DNA was extracted from seven Candida prototype strains (C. albicans ATCC18804, C. glabrata ATCC2001, C. parapsilosis ATCC22019, C. tropicalis ATCC 200956, C. krusei ATCC6258, C. lusitaniae ATCC66035, and C. pelliculosa ATCC8168) using a previously described method [17], and these samples were used as positive controls.

PCR primers

The fungus-specific universal oligonucleotides ITS1 and ITS4 [18] were used as outer primers. In the second amplification, the previously described inner primers for C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis complex, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei were used [18, 19]. The primers for C. lusitaniae and C. pelliculosa were designed with the PrimerQuestSM and Primer-BLAST tools. The primer sequences are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers employed in the nested multiplex PCR amplifications
Full size table

Multiplex nested PCR and detection of amplification products

To avoid carryover contamination of the assays, reaction mixes, DNA extractions and amplifications were set up in separate rooms equipped with safety cabinets [20].

The first round of amplification was carried out in a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 1× PCR buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 200 μM dNTP (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μM each primer (ITS1 and ITS4), 1.25 U Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), and 50 ng of genomic DNA from blood samples, which served as the DNA template. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C followed by 35 cycles of 45 s at 95°C, 45 s at 50°C, and 45 s at 72°C, with a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. The reactions were carried out in a Veriti thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

The second round of amplifications were performed in two separate assays: assay 1, containing primers CLU, CTR, CALB, and CGL at concentrations of 0.1 μM, 0.12 μM, 0.2 μM, and 0.3 μM, respectively; and assay 2, containing primers CKR, CPAR, and CPEL at concentrations of 0.2 μM, 0.15 μM, and 0.12 μM, respectively. In both assays, 2 μL of a 1:100 dilution of the ITS PCR product was used as the DNA template. This template was mixed with the inner primers and 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to fresh reaction mixtures in a total volume of 25 μL. The amplifications were carried out in the same thermocycler under the following conditions: an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C, 10 cycles of 45 s at 95°C, 45 s at 67-58°C (touchdown), and 45 s at 72°C followed by 20 cycles of 45 s at 95°C, 45 s at 58°C, and 45 s at 72°C, with a final extension of 5 min at 72°C.

In all experiments, negative controls containing sterile water instead of genomic DNA and positive controls containing Candida DNA were tested.

The nested PCR products were detected on 2.5% agarose gels stained with GelRedâ„¢ (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) and visualised under a UV transilluminator apparatus (UVITEC, Cambridge, UK).

Multiplex nested PCR detection limit and specificity

To determine the detection limit for Candida DNA in clinical specimens, nested amplifications were performed with genomic DNA extracted from 1 mL of a blood sample obtained from a healthy subject spiked with the seven Candida species DNA ranging from 1.5 ng to 15 fg (one Candida genome corresponds to approximately 37 fg of DNA). Each of the Candida species was tested separately [21].

The PCR specificity was evaluated by testing DNA samples from microorganisms that are common etiologic agents of neonatal and paediatric sepsis, such as Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The DNA samples of other Candida species such as C. guilliermondii, C. kefyr, C. famata, C. dubliniensis and C. haemulonii, as well as some non-Candida fungi (Cryptococcus sp., Trichosporon sp., Rhodotorula sp., Aspergillus sp., and Fusarium sp.) were also tested.

Sequencing of the PCR products

To certify that the amplified products corresponded to Candida sequences, the PCR products generated from the blood samples that yielded negative blood cultures were sequenced on an ABI 3730 DNA apparatus (Applied Biosystems). Sequence alignments were performed with ClustalW2, and the nucleotide sequence consensus was compared with those of other Candida strains available in GenBank using the BLAST tool.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the results was carried out with SPSS software (13.0). The McNemar test was employed.

Results

The detection limit of the multiplex nested PCR for the seven tested Candida species was 150 fg, or the equivalent of four Candida genomes/mL of blood. Regarding the specificity, the bacteria, other Candida species and non-Candida fungi did not produce any amplification products.

Among the 54 enrolled patients, 32 were males and 22 were females, with ages ranging from six days to 16 years. All patients had central venous catheters and had received broad-spectrum antibiotics for more than 96 hours at the time of blood sampling. Subsequently to the blood collections, 38 patients (70.4%) initiated presumptive antifungal therapy due to the suspicion of fungal infection.

Blood from eight patients yielded positive cultures (14.8%), while Candida DNA was detected in 13 patients (24.0%) by the molecular assay, including the eight patients with positive cultures (Figure 1). Demographic data, clinical conditions, and the outcomes of these 13 patients are described in Table 2. The McNemar test did not uncover a disagreement between the blood cultures and the multiplex nested PCR results (p = 0.063).

Figure 1
figure 1

Agarose gel showing the nested multiplex PCR products obtained from patients after amplification with primers for assays 1 and 2. Lane L – 100 bp molecular weight marker (GE Healthcare); Lanes 1 and 8 – Negative controls; Lanes 2 and 9 – Patient 2 (C. albicans); Lanes 3 and 10 – Patient 8 (C. albicans); Lanes 4 and 11 – Patient 11 (C. tropicalis); Lanes 5 and 12 – Patient 13 (C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis); Lanes 6 and 13 – Patient 7 (C. krusei); Lane 7 – Positive controls for assay 1: DNA from C. glabrata (423 bp), C. tropicalis (357 bp), C. albicans (272 bp) and C. lusitaniae (137 bp) reference strains; Lane 14 – Positive controls for assay 2: DNA from C. krusei (362 bp), C. parapsilosis (297 bp) and C. pelliculosa (160 bp) reference strains.

Full size image
Table 2 Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of the 13 patients with positive PCR
Full size table

Regarding Candida species identification, PCR was 100% concordant with blood cultures. There were five patients in whom the multiplex-nested PCR was positive and the blood cultures were negative. The amplification products were submitted to sequencing analysis and showed 99 to 100% sequence identity with the Candida reference strains (Table 2). Among these five patients, PCR was able to identify dual candidaemia (C. parapsilosis sensu stricto and C. tropicalis) in the blood samples of three patients with negative cultures (Table 2).

The multiplex nested PCR was consistently negative when DNA samples obtained from the control group patients were amplified. In addition, the technique allowed the release of results in 24 hours, as opposed to the mean time of 72 hours for blood cultures.

Discussion and conclusions

This study describes the development of a multiplex nested PCR method to detect and identify the seven of the most Candida species causing invasive candidiasis in the paediatric ICU setting: C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. krusei C. lusitaniae and C. pelliculosa[22, 23]. The primers designed to amplify these Candida species showed consistent and specific results (Figure 1).

Although C. lusitaniae is less frequently isolated from paediatric bloodstream infections, the clinical relevance of the identification of this species relates to its association with resistance to amphotericin B and worse clinical outcome [24]. Outbreaks of C. pelliculosa in paediatric intensive care units have already been reported in Brazil [25], reinforcing the importance of the inclusion of this Candida species in molecular investigations.

This multiplex nested PCR method reached the detection limit of four Candida genomes/mL of blood for the seven investigated species, which is an excellent analytical sensitivity considering the recommendation for candidaemia diagnostic molecular tests (i.e., detection of at least 10 CFU/mL of blood) [2, 26]. Tirodker et al. also compared PCR and blood cultures for Candida detection in patients in the paediatric ICU with suspected fungemia, revealing that the molecular technique had a higher positivity. However, the single-round PCR utilised by these authors could not discriminate Candida species and had a detection limit of 100 CFU/0.5 mL of blood [27]. Thus, the multiplex nested PCR developed in the current study was more sensitive. Cross-reactions with other organisms aside from Candida as well as non-specific amplifications in the control group were not observed in the present study, indicating that this multiplex nested PCR method is both specific and sensitive.

Our molecular assay yielded more positive results than blood cultures (24.0% vs. 14.8%, respectively). Sequencing of the amplification products obtained from the five PCR-positive patients with negative blood cultures confirmed that the amplification products were from the expected Candida species, demonstrating the specificity of the test.

The statistical comparison between the two laboratory techniques (blood culture versus multiplex nested PCR) did not reveal a significant difference (p = 0.063), most likely due to the restricted number of patients and samples (n = 54). Nevertheless, several studies have previously demonstrated that molecular techniques perform better than culture methods [2, 10, 12].

In our study, C. albicans was the most frequently isolated species in blood cultures (five out of eight positive results), while the multiplex nested PCR identified C. albicans, C. parapsilosis complex, and C. tropicalis at similar frequencies (Table 2). Thus, the molecular tool allowed the identification of a range of different Candida species that cause bloodstream infections in these critically ill paediatric patients.

Dual candidaemia was detected in three patients only by the multiplex nested PCR method (C. parapsilosis sensu stricto and C. tropicalis). In fact, dual candidaemia has been increasingly reported with the advent of diagnostic molecular tools and may be clinically relevant in cases in which one of the detected Candida species is resistant to drugs usually employed in the antifungal therapy [11, 12, 28, 29]. However, as reported in other studies [30, 31], it was not possible to differentiate the dual candidaemia patients from those with only one Candida species with respect to the risk factors and the infection outcome, probably because of the restricted number of cases. Although C. albicans is often involved in mixed candidaemia episodes [29–31], this species was not present in these three particular cases. This may be related to the fact that in Brazil C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis are the non-C. albicans species more frequently isolated from candidaemia episodes, particularly in paediatric ICU patients [32, 33].

While detection of Candida DNA by the PCR assay in blood samples from patients with negative cultures can be related to transient episodes rather than true candidaemia, the finding of a positive PCR in a critically ill patient should be strongly considered due to the high potential of this eventually transient episode to rapidly turn into a systemic infection. On the other hand, the fact that our multiplex PCR assay was negative in all 28 control children, strongly suggests that this assay can be useful, in association with appropriate clinical evaluation, to rule out the presence of candidaemia and interrupt unnecessary antifungal therapy [34]. Studies with higher number of patients are necessary to determine precisely its negative predictive value.

Our multiplex nested PCR method showed other important advantages. The time to PCR results was 24 hours, while the mean time to release blood culture results was 72 hours, ranging from 48 to 96 hours considering the patients in this study. The ability to detect infection early and discriminate Candida species is extremely important for planning the introduction of antifungal therapy, thus improving the outcome of infected patients and reducing the hospitalisation costs [11]. In addition this assay allows for the detection of Candida in small volumes of blood, which is an advantage for ICU neonates and younger children [6]. However, this study was designed such that equal volumes of blood were used to perform cultures and PCR (1-2 mL) to ensure that the results were comparable.

An intrinsic limitation of studies designed to validate molecular diagnostic tools for Candida infections is that the gold standard method—blood culture—is a technique that lacks sensitivity [2]. Other tests that could eventually be used to confirm the molecular results, such as the β-1,3 glucan and mannan tests, also lack sensitivity and specificity [35, 36].

Novel technologies have recently been exploited for rapid detection and identification of Candida species in bloodstream infections. Some assays based on real- time platforms have also been developed to detect candidaemia, though some limitations of sensitivity and specificity were observed [36, 37]. A recently described magnetic resonance-based technology (T2Candida ®) seems to be able to detect low concentrations of Candida in whole blood samples (as low as one CFU/mL) in less than two hours [38]. However, further investigations are still required for validation of both methodologies in the clinical and laboratory settings.

We proposed a multiplex PCR assay targeting the ITS region of Candida ribosomal DNA able to identify the main Candida species involved in bloodstream paediatric infections with a detection limit of less than 10 CFU/mL, high specificity, and as least as sensitive as blood cultures but with a shorter turnaround time. Use of the multiplex nested PCR method also allowed the detection and identification of one or more Candida species in the same reaction.

Abbreviations

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

ICU:

Intensive care unit

SIRS:

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

ATCC:

American Type Culture Collection

ITS:

Intergenic space region of ribosomal DNA

dNTP:

Deoxynucleotide triphosphate

MgCl2 :

Magnesium chloride.

References

  1. Arendrup MC: Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010, 16 (5): 445-452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Avni T, Leibovici L, Paul M: PCR diagnosis of invasive candidiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011, 49 (2): 665-670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin DK, Poole C, Steinbach WJ, Rowen JL, Walsh TJ: Neonatal candidemia and end-organ damage: a critical appraisal of the literature using meta-analytic techniques. Pediatrics. 2003, 112 (3 Pt1): 634-640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB: Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 39: 309-317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaoutis TE, Prasad PA, Localio AR, Coffin SE, Bell LM, Walsh TJ, Gross R: Risk factors and predictors for candidemia in pediatric intensive care unit patients: implications for prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2010, 51 (5): e38-e45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman DA: Challenging issues in neonatal candidiasis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010, 26 (7): 1769-1778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chai ALY, Denning DW, Warn P: Candida tropicalis in human disease. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2010, 36 (4): 282-298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nucci M, Queiroz-Telles F, Alvarado-Matute T, Tiraboschi IN, Cortes J, Zurita J, Guzman-Blanco M, Santolaya ME, Thompson L, Sifuentes-Osornio J, Echevarria JI, Colombo AL: Epidemiology of candidemia in Latin America: a laboratory-based survey. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (3): e59373-

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. See LLC: Bloodstream infection in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005, 6: S42-44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lau A, Sorrell TC, Chen S, Stanley K, Iredell J, Halliday C: Multiplex tandem PCR: a novel platform for rapid detection and identification of fungal pathogens from blood culture specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2008, 46 (9): 3021-3027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zilberberg MD, Kollef MH, Arnold H, Labelle A, Micek ST, Kothari S, Shorr AF: Inappropriate empiric antifungal therapy for candidemia in the ICU and hospital resource utilization: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2010, 10: 150-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmad S, Khan Z, Mustafa AS, Khan ZU: Seminested PCR for diagnosis of candidemia: comparison with culture, antigen detection, and biochemical methods for species identification. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 2483-2489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Alam FF, Mustafa AS, Khan ZU: Comparative evaluation of (1,3)-β-D-glucan, mannan and anti-mannan antibodies, and Candida species-specific snPCR in patients with candidemia. BMC Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 103-111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Carvalho A, Costa-De-Oliveira S, Martins ML, Pina-Vaz C, Rodrigues AG, Ludovico P, Rodrigues F: Multiplex PCR identification of eight clinically relevant Candida species. Med Mycol. 2007, 45: 619-627.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A: International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005, 6 (1): 2-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Löffler J, Hebart H, Schumacher U, Reitze H, Einsele H: Comparison of different methods for extraction of DNA of fungal pathogens from cultures and blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 3311-3312.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Burik J, Myerson D, Schreckhise RW, Bowden R: Panfungal PCR assay for detection of fungal infection in human blood specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 1169-1175.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo G, Mitchell TG: Rapid identification of pathogenic fungi directly from cultures by using multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 2860-2865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bougnoux M, Dupont C, Mateo J, Saulnier P, Faivre V, Payen D, Nicolas-Chanoine M: Serum is more suitable than whole blood for diagnosis of systemic candidiasis by nested PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 925-930.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rolfs A, Schuller I, Finckh U, Weber-Rolfs I: PCR contamination and falsely interpreted results. PCR: clinical diagnostics and research. 1992, Berlin: Springer, 61-67.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Riggsby WS, Torres-Bauza LJ, Wills JW, Townes TM: DNA content, kinetic complexity, and the ploid question in Candida albicans. Mol Cell Biol. 1982, 2: 853-862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Colombo AL, Nucci M, Park BJ, Nouér SA, Arthington-Skaggs B, da Matta DA, Warnock D, Morgan J, Brazilian Network Candidemia Study: Epidemiology of candidemia in Brazil: a nationwide sentinel surveillance of candidemia in eleven medical centers. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44 (8): 2816-2833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ: Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007, 20: 133-163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Blinkhorn RJ, Adelstein D, Spagnuolo PJ: Emergence of a new opportunistic pathogen: Candida lusitaniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1989, 27 (2): 236-240.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Aragão PA, Oshiro IC, Manrique EI, Gomes CC, Matsuo LL, Leone C, Moretti-Branchini ML, Levin AS, IRIS Study Group: Pichia anomala outbreak in a nursery: exogenous source?. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001, 20 (9): 843-848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. White PL, Barton R, Guiver M, Linton CJ, Wilson S, Smith M, Gomez BL, Carr MJ, Kimmitt PT, Seaton S, Rajakumar K, Holyoake T, Kibbler CC, Johnson E, Hobson RP, Jones B, Barnes RA: A consensus on fungal polymerase chain reaction diagnosis? A United Kingdom-Ireland evaluation of polymerase chain reaction methods for detection of systemic fungal infections. J Molec Diagn. 2006, 8 (3): 376-384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tirodker UH, Nataro JP, Smith S, LasCasas L, Fairchild KD: Detection of fungemia by polymerase chain reaction in critically ill neonates and children. J Perinatol. 2003, 23 (2): 117-122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Del Negro GM, Delgado AF, Manuli ER, Yamamoto L, Okay TS: Dual candidemia detected by nested polymerase chain reaction in two critically ill children. Med Mycol. 2010, 48 (8): 1116-1120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Boktour M, Kontoyiannis DP, Hanna HA, Hachem RY, Girgawy E, Bodey GP, Raad II: Multiple-species candidemia in patients with cancer. Cancer. 2004, 101 (8): 1860-1865.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jensen J, Muñoz P, Guinea J, Rodríguez-Créixems M, Peláez T, Bouza E: Mixed fungemia: incidence, risk factors, and mortality in a general hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 44 (12): e109-114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pulimood S, Ganesan L, Alangaden G, Chandrasekar P: Polymicrobial candidemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002, 44 (4): 353-357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Colombo AL, Guimarães T, Camargo LF, Richtmann R, Queiroz-Telles FD, Salles MJ, Cunha CA, Yasuda MA, Moretti ML, Nucci M: Brazilian guidelines for the management of candidiasis - a joint meeting report of three medical societies: Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia, Sociedade Paulista de Infectologia and Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. Braz J Infect Dis. 2013, 17 (3): 283-312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Santolaya ME, Alvarado T, Queiroz-Telles F, Colombo AL, Zurita J, Tiraboschi IN, Cortes JA, Thompson L, Guzman M, Sifuentes J, Echevarría JI, Nucci M: Active surveillance of candidemia in children from Latin America: a key requirement for improving disease outcome. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014, 33 (2): e40-44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH: Finding the “missing 50%” of invasive candidiasis: how nonculture diagnostics will improve understanding of disease spectrum and transform patient care. Clin Infect Dis. 2013, 56 (9): 1284-1292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Montagna MT, Caggiano G, Borghi E, Morace G: The role of the laboratory in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Drugs. 2009, 69 (Suppl 1): 59-63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen MH, Wissel MC, Shields RK, Salomoni MA, Hao B, Press EG, Shields RM, Cheng S, Mitsani D, Vadnerkar A, Silveira FP, Kleiboeker SB, Clancy CJ: Performance of Candida real-time polymerase chain reaction, β-D-glucan assay, and blood cultures in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 54 (9): 1240-1248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Neely LA, Audeh M, Phung NA, Min M, Suchocki A, Plourde D, Blanco M, Demas V, Skewis LR, Anagnostou T, Coleman JJ, Wellman P, Mylonakis E, Lowery TJ: T2 magnetic resonance enables nanoparticle-mediated rapid detection of candidemia in whole blood. Sci Transl Med. 2013, 5 (182): 182ra54-

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lau A, Halliday C, Chen SC, Playford EG, Stanley K, Sorrell TC: Comparison of whole blood, serum, and plasma for early detection of candidemia by multiplex-tandem PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48 (3): 811-816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Antonio José Gonçalves Leal from the Pediatric Surgery Division, Instituto da Criança - HCFMUSP for providing blood samples from the control group. Angela Midori Matuhara from the Intensive Care Unit, Instituto da Criança - HCFMUSP for clinical support in selecting patients for samples collection. Dr. Gil Benard for critically reviewing the manuscript.

Financial support

This study was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP 2010/02626-6 and FAPESP 2010/09715-4.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Medical Mycology (LIM-53), Clinical Dermartology Division, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP) and Instituto de Medicina Tropical da Universidade de São Paulo (IMT-USP), Av. Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 500, Andar térreo, Predio 2, CEP, 05403-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Cleison Ledesma Taira & Gilda Maria Barbaro Del Negro

  2. Laboratory of Seroepidemiology and Immunobiology, IMT-USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Thelma Suely Okay

  3. Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units, Instituto da Criança, HCFMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Artur Figueiredo Delgado & Maria Esther Jurfest Rivero Ceccon

  4. Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Dermatologic, Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil

    Margarete Teresa Gottardo de Almeida

Authors
  1. Cleison Ledesma Taira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thelma Suely Okay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Artur Figueiredo Delgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria Esther Jurfest Rivero Ceccon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Margarete Teresa Gottardo de Almeida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gilda Maria Barbaro Del Negro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilda Maria Barbaro Del Negro.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

CLT contributed on the conception of the study, carried out the molecular techniques, participated in acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafted the manuscript. TSO contributed on the study design and critically revised the manuscript. AFD, MEJRC and MTGA participated in patients recruitment and acquisition of data. GMBDN coordinated the study design, contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taira, C.L., Okay, T.S., Delgado, A.F. et al. A multiplex nested PCR for the detection and identification of Candida species in blood samples of critically ill paediatric patients. BMC Infect Dis 14, 406 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-406

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-406

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us